Cosmo 
Member 
 
Registered: 29th Mar 01
 Location: Im the real one! 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
quote: Originally posted by strick206 
quote: Originally posted by Cosmo 
quote: Originally posted by mikenoncorsa 
Thats all well and good but apart from Torres and gerrard no other Liverpool player (possibly alonso) would get into the utd squad 
   
 
Squad?! 
 
Reina, Arbeloa, one of Carra, Agger and Skrtel, Mascherano....would all get in the squad. 
 
Reina, Mascherano, Alonso, Gerrard and Torres would all walk into the United starting 11 IMO. 
   
 
   Bollocks they would 
 
Alonso is no better than carrick, and mascherano does no better a job than anderson does 
 
Also think VDS and reina are about equal, imo both overrated 
   
 
Like I said, Alonso/Carrick is a debatable choice. It could go either way, but I rate Alonso. 
 
If you think Anderson if better than Masch then you're fucking dillusional. Honestly, that is Doyle style dillusion.
 | 
Cosmo 
Member 
 
Registered: 29th Mar 01
 Location: Im the real one! 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
quote: Originally posted by strick206 
quote: Originally posted by Eck 
Carragher would walk straight into the Utd squad, and into the first team at right back. 
   
 
I don't even think cosmo could agree with that tbh, wes brown is in a different league to carragher in terms of being a right back 
   
 
He is as good as Wes Brown. Prob not as good as O'Shea has been recently. Depends if you are after a solid defender (which he wins hands down for above the rest) or someone who can attack too. 
 
Personally I think Arbeloa is a better RB than Carra.
 | 
strick206 
Member 
 
Registered: 12th Apr 07
 Location: Wigan Drives:Integra DC5 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
I think O'shea has just been filling in, nowhere near as good as wes brown is, going forward and in defence 
 
I don't think carragher is a RB at all, he's a centre back and imo cannot play RB to the level he can CB, hence why he never got in the england squad, too many better players at CB, and he just isnt good enough at RB 
 
[Edited on 21-05-2009 by strick206]
 | 
strick206 
Member 
 
Registered: 12th Apr 07
 Location: Wigan Drives:Integra DC5 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
quote: Originally posted by Cosmo 
If you think Anderson if better than Masch then you're fucking dillusional. Honestly, that is Doyle style dillusion. 
   
 
Not really dillusional, masch does much the same as anderson, but doesn't offer the same level of passing ability, imo they are very equal, but to say masch is in a different class (which im assuming from the fucking dillusional) is way way off the mark
 | 
Cosmo 
Member 
 
Registered: 29th Mar 01
 Location: Im the real one! 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
Agreed about RB, even he hates playing there. IMO he was once good enough for England CB, but I never lost any sleep about him not getting a place, better for us. 
 
Oh, and you're still dillusional.
 | 
strick206 
Member 
 
Registered: 12th Apr 07
 Location: Wigan Drives:Integra DC5 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
   Fish as much as you like 
 | 
Cosmo 
Member 
 
Registered: 29th Mar 01
 Location: Im the real one! 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
quote: Originally posted by strick206 
quote: Originally posted by Cosmo 
If you think Anderson if better than Masch then you're fucking dillusional. Honestly, that is Doyle style dillusion. 
   
 
Not really dillusional, masch does much the same as anderson, but doesn't offer the same level of passing ability, imo they are very equal, but to say masch is in a different class (which im assuming from the fucking dillusional) is way way off the mark 
   
 
    
 
Seriously, take the glasses off.  
 
Masch is world class. He is probably the best in that position in the world at the moment.  
 
Anderson cant even get in to the Unied team over Fletcher.
 | 
strick206 
Member 
 
Registered: 12th Apr 07
 Location: Wigan Drives:Integra DC5 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
quote: Originally posted by Cosmo 
 
Seriously, take the glasses off. 
   
 
Practice what you preach
 | 
Cosmo 
Member 
 
Registered: 29th Mar 01
 Location: Im the real one! 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
quote: Originally posted by strick206 
   Fish as much as you like  
   
 
Im not, really Im not. 
 
I honestly cant believe you think Anderson is as good   
 
Even a Brazilian Jiz will tell you Masch is better than his fellow countryman.
 | 
Cosmo 
Member 
 
Registered: 29th Mar 01
 Location: Im the real one! 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
Fucking                 
 | 
Nath 
Member 
 
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
 Location: MK 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
Essien is better than Masch.
 | 
strick206 
Member 
 
Registered: 12th Apr 07
 Location: Wigan Drives:Integra DC5 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
As i said with anderson, he has had a lot of injuries this year, and been in and out of the team, and unlike liverpool, players arent able to walk back into a winning team
 | 
strick206 
Member 
 
Registered: 12th Apr 07
 Location: Wigan Drives:Integra DC5 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
quote: Originally posted by Nath 
Essien is better than Masch. 
   
 
And i'll agree with that, i was trying to think of a player to say was much better than masch, nath has pointed it out
 | 
Cosmo 
Member 
 
Registered: 29th Mar 01
 Location: Im the real one! 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
quote: Originally posted by Nath 
Essien is better than Masch. 
   
 
Different types of player. Essien is much much more attacking. 
 
Im talking of a proper holding midfielder.
 | 
strick206 
Member 
 
Registered: 12th Apr 07
 Location: Wigan Drives:Integra DC5 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
quote: Originally posted by Cosmo 
quote: Originally posted by strick206 
   Fish as much as you like  
   
 
Im not, really Im not. 
 
I honestly cant believe you think Anderson is as good   
 
Even a Brazilian Jiz will tell you Masch is better than his fellow countryman. 
   
 
I fail to see what Masch offers that anderson doesnt   
 
As far as i can see, masch breaks up the play, and then passes it to the more creative players
 | 
Nath 
Member 
 
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
 Location: MK 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
quote: Originally posted by Cosmo 
quote: Originally posted by Nath 
Essien is better than Masch. 
   
 
Different types of player. Essien is much much more attacking. 
 
Im talking of a proper holding midfielder. 
   
 
Essien isnt attacking. Not in my eyes. Lampard is attacking. If we're talking about central midfield players. 
 
I'd compare Lamps to Gerrard, and Masch to Essien.
 | 
strick206 
Member 
 
Registered: 12th Apr 07
 Location: Wigan Drives:Integra DC5 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
quote: Originally posted by Cosmo 
quote: Originally posted by Nath 
Essien is better than Masch. 
   
 
Different types of player. Essien is much much more attacking. 
 
Im talking of a proper holding midfielder. 
   
 
Ahh right, so now you are only talking about a holding midfielder, and not a holding midfielder who attacks also, we can't compare anderson and masch 
 
Because both united's best centre mids, infact all of them (including hargreaves) are holding players who attack and create
 | 
Cosmo 
Member 
 
Registered: 29th Mar 01
 Location: Im the real one! 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
Yes, he is a defensive midfielder. Infact more than that, he is an out and out holding midfielder. And IMO he is the best at that job in the world. 
 
He isnt an Essien, who IMO is being restrained as is a much more attacking player naturally.
 | 
strick206 
Member 
 
Registered: 12th Apr 07
 Location: Wigan Drives:Integra DC5 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
quote: Originally posted by Cosmo 
Yes, he is a defensive midfielder. Infact more than that, he is an out and out holding midfielder. And IMO he is the best at that job in the world. 
 
He isnt an Essien, who IMO is being restrained as is a much more attacking player naturally. 
   
 
Essien is the sole reason why chelsea slumped this season imo 
 
And now he is back he also makes chelsea very overpriced for the league next season. 
 
And imo he is a world class holding midfield player, who has one hell of a strike on him
 | 
Nath 
Member 
 
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
 Location: MK 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
I'd sooner have Essien. Seeing as they both play in the same holding role.
 | 
Cosmo 
Member 
 
Registered: 29th Mar 01
 Location: Im the real one! 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
quote: Originally posted by strick206 
Ahh right, so now you are only talking about a holding midfielder, and not a holding midfielder who attacks also, we can't compare anderson and masch 
 
Because both united's best centre mids, infact all of them (including hargreaves) are holding players who attack and create 
   
 
So now?! When did I ever say Masch attacks? He doesnt. He sits and breaks up the oppositions play - hence he is a true holding midfielder. 
 
I dont know, or care, if you class Anderson as that. Either way he isnt as good.  
 
Essien IMO isnt a holding midfielder, he is much more attacking. Much like Lampard, Alonso, Gerrard, Carrick etc. etc. arent holding midfielders.
 | 
Nath 
Member 
 
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
 Location: MK 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
quote: Originally posted by strick206 
 
Essien is the sole reason why chelsea slumped this season imo 
 
 
   
 
I said to my Dad the other day that if Chelsea had Hiddink from Day 1, and kept Essien fit they'd have won the League.
 | 
Nath 
Member 
 
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
 Location: MK 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
quote: Originally posted by Cosmo 
quote: Originally posted by strick206 
Ahh right, so now you are only talking about a holding midfielder, and not a holding midfielder who attacks also, we can't compare anderson and masch 
 
Because both united's best centre mids, infact all of them (including hargreaves) are holding players who attack and create 
   
 
So now?! When did I ever say Masch attacks? He doesnt. He sits and breaks up the oppositions play - hence he is a true holding midfielder. 
 
I dont know, or care, if you class Anderson as that. Either way he isnt as good.  
 
Essien IMO isnt a holding midfielder, he is much more attacking. Much like Lampard, Alonso, Gerrard, Carrick etc. etc. arent holding midfielders. 
   
 
Lamps and Gerrard are nothing like Alonso and Carrick. The latter are nowhere near as attacking!
 | 
Cosmo 
Member 
 
Registered: 29th Mar 01
 Location: Im the real one! 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
Essien I agree with. He is a world class player. He just isnt a holding midfielder IMO. Either way, both him and Masch are lightyears better than Anderson (who I rate btw). 
 
I dont get the Hiddink think. Anyone who watched the Scolari Chavski for the first 2-3 months of the season would of been running to the bookies to put a bet on them winning the league. 
 
 | 
strick206 
Member 
 
Registered: 12th Apr 07
 Location: Wigan Drives:Integra DC5 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
quote: Originally posted by Cosmo 
quote: Originally posted by strick206 
Ahh right, so now you are only talking about a holding midfielder, and not a holding midfielder who attacks also, we can't compare anderson and masch 
 
Because both united's best centre mids, infact all of them (including hargreaves) are holding players who attack and create 
   
 
So now?! When did I ever say Masch attacks? He doesnt. He sits and breaks up the oppositions play - hence he is a true holding midfielder. 
 
I dont know, or care, if you class Anderson as that. Either way he isnt as good.  
 
Essien IMO isnt a holding midfielder, he is much more attacking. Much like Lampard, Alonso, Gerrard, Carrick etc. etc. arent holding midfielders. 
   
 
No, i am saying that anderson is not only a holding player, who can happily sit all day and tackle, help the defence, he is much more creative also, and is probably similar to alonso than masch 
 
But still, masch certainly isnt the best in the world in his position, essien is
 |