corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » just picked up a tigra.


New Topic

New Poll
  <<  1    2    3  >> Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.


Author just picked up a tigra.
Ian
Site Administrator

Avatar

Registered: 28th Aug 99
Location: Liverpool
User status: Offline
25th May 04 at 20:18   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

What Corsa are you comparing it to? They're different enough if you're comparing to something lowered on springs alone or something.
Natz
Member

Registered: 18th Dec 00
Location: Milk 'n' Beans
User status: Offline
25th May 04 at 20:23   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

i want a tigra, think ill have one of them rather than a new shape corsa, but im still debating!

tigras to me are squashed up corsas, but nuff sexual!
corsa120
Member

Registered: 4th May 02
Location: Northamptonshire
User status: Offline
25th May 04 at 20:25   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

could just be me but if ur drivin a 12v greg the that comes with monster truck shocks undernieth personally ive driven both 1.4 16v corsa's and tigra's and the are exactly the same may just be the fact that ur ina different car with sport seats and lower to the ground standard

also could be the power from a 12v to a 16v sport thats throwing ya
Greg_M
Member

Registered: 2nd Sep 03
Location: Grantham, Lincolnshire
User status: Offline
26th May 04 at 09:10   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

i have driven more powerfull corsa, incuding the corsa C sri, and a mates valver, tigra still handles better
MattyB
Member

Registered: 13th Nov 01
Location: 118.5bhp :D
User status: Offline
26th May 04 at 11:51   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by M2RV H
how can it handle better when its the same chassie?


Its not as 'tall' as the corsa b, meaning lower centre of gavity. If u look at the shape, the weight is also better distributed. When u look at the side profile, the main "bulge" is in the centre, as opposed to 33% engine bay, the rest tall bubble as seen in the corsa.

The suspension components and the chassis maybe the same, but the way the body is built around them affects it big time.

I remember seeing a site along time ago, where a guy tested the 2 using a computer programme thingy, and they were very different.

Its the same as saying the Cavalier and the Calibra should handle identically coz they use the same chassis/suspension, but they dont. Not by a long shot.

Matt
Marc
Member

Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
26th May 04 at 11:53   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Tigras are the way forward imo
jaffa
Member

Registered: 27th Mar 00
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
User status: Offline
26th May 04 at 12:04   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by M2RV H
how can it handle better when its the same chassie?


puma and fiesta are the same but puma handles better, or so i thought
Marc
Member

Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
26th May 04 at 12:05   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

weight distribution will have some say in it.
dragoncorsa
Member

Registered: 2nd May 02
Location: manchester, GSImerit??????
User status: Offline
26th May 04 at 12:07   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

i think not enough tigra's have been done up, just imagine a tigra on 18" with a 2.5v6 in it how sweet wud that b!
Tom
Member

Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: Wirral, Merseyside
User status: Offline
26th May 04 at 12:11   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

I like them
Nobber
Member

Registered: 7th Nov 03
Location: Newbury - Berks Drives: Leon Cupra R & Mk5 GTi
User status: Offline
26th May 04 at 12:26   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

I love them to bits as you'd imagine. Still not sure if I will be selling it. Wait and see what happens with the coilovers!

I must admit, I've driven a corsa and the tigra and always thought the tigra handled so much better. Gives you confidence in bends.

Welcome to the club Greg. Ignore all these people who say it's a girls car or you must be gay. It's much sexier looking than a corsa imo.
DanielJ
Member

Registered: 21st Nov 01
Location: gwent, south wales
User status: Offline
26th May 04 at 12:31   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by PaulW
quote:
Originally posted by Greg12v
aparently is supposed to make it easy to shut the boot, otherwise the window would pop out or something!


similair to 'very' early corsa's, the lil air-vents under the b-pillars were put in as when the boot was shut or a door was shut hard, the rear window would blow out!


always wondered wa they were 4
Greg_M
Member

Registered: 2nd Sep 03
Location: Grantham, Lincolnshire
User status: Offline
26th May 04 at 16:34   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by MattyB
quote:
Originally posted by M2RV H
how can it handle better when its the same chassie?


Its not as 'tall' as the corsa b, meaning lower centre of gavity. If u look at the shape, the weight is also better distributed. When u look at the side profile, the main "bulge" is in the centre, as opposed to 33% engine bay, the rest tall bubble as seen in the corsa.

The suspension components and the chassis maybe the same, but the way the body is built around them affects it big time.

I remember seeing a site along time ago, where a guy tested the 2 using a computer programme thingy, and they were very different.

Its the same as saying the Cavalier and the Calibra should handle identically coz they use the same chassis/suspension, but they dont. Not by a long shot.

Matt


thank you, it not all about the suspension and stuff, so
nat16v
Member

Registered: 1st Mar 04
Location: kidderminster,west midz drives:escort si
User status: Offline
26th May 04 at 18:52   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

my mum bought a tigra 1.4 saturday
i went out in it the other day to try it out
i loved it but for some reason it seemed quicker than my 1.4 corsa sport it seems to pull away much quicker ,but then again i think theres summit wrong wiv mine
the_legend_of_yrag
Member

Registered: 7th Jul 03
Location: Cambridgeshire
User status: Offline
26th May 04 at 19:01   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

1.4 tigras are alot quicker iifrc then ya 1.4 corsas, higher insurance group too as i looked into getting one before getting my corsa, and couldnt get insured on it
the_legend_of_yrag
Member

Registered: 7th Jul 03
Location: Cambridgeshire
User status: Offline
26th May 04 at 19:02   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by DanielJ
quote:
Originally posted by PaulW
quote:
Originally posted by Greg12v
aparently is supposed to make it easy to shut the boot, otherwise the window would pop out or something!


similair to 'very' early corsa's, the lil air-vents under the b-pillars were put in as when the boot was shut or a door was shut hard, the rear window would blow out!


always wondered wa they were 4


Also wondered this was trying to figure out why the other day
fax2004
Member

Registered: 1st Nov 03
Location: 172
User status: Offline
26th May 04 at 19:11   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Sisters just bought a 1.4 16v Tigra Bermuda last sat, for 3700 on a 98 R. Tis a minter, and also thought the window thing was a electric gremlin. Its got loads of kit, including a leccy sunroof, which i got told other 1.4s dont have? How much did u pay?
Greg_M
Member

Registered: 2nd Sep 03
Location: Grantham, Lincolnshire
User status: Offline
26th May 04 at 19:12   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

they quicker due to being lighter and more steamline?
Adam
Member

Registered: 1st May 01
Location: Hurstbourne Tarrant
User status: Offline
26th May 04 at 19:18   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

same engines, same acceleration, same chasis as the corsa so will weigh about the same
Greg_M
Member

Registered: 2nd Sep 03
Location: Grantham, Lincolnshire
User status: Offline
26th May 04 at 19:21   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

they are quicker, so why? if they are soooo the corsa all over agin they will be the same, but tigras are quicker?
nat16v
Member

Registered: 1st Mar 04
Location: kidderminster,west midz drives:escort si
User status: Offline
26th May 04 at 19:26   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by the_legend_of_yrag
1.4 tigras are alot quicker iifrc then ya 1.4 corsas, higher insurance group too as i looked into getting one before getting my corsa, and couldnt get insured on it

yeah out of interest (incase my mum wanted to swap for me corsa :loli got a quote online n it would be £20 more a month
Greg_M
Member

Registered: 2nd Sep 03
Location: Grantham, Lincolnshire
User status: Offline
26th May 04 at 19:31   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

tigra 1.6 is insurance group 12!
Adam
Member

Registered: 1st May 01
Location: Hurstbourne Tarrant
User status: Offline
26th May 04 at 19:48   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

the 0-60 is the same for both cars
Adam
Member

Registered: 1st May 01
Location: Hurstbourne Tarrant
User status: Offline
26th May 04 at 19:49   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

and the tigra is a massive 16kgs lighter
Adam
Member

Registered: 1st May 01
Location: Hurstbourne Tarrant
User status: Offline
26th May 04 at 19:50   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Corsa
1.4 16V Sport 3d 1389/4 88 112 10.5 37 179 6

Tigra

1.4i 16V 3d 1389/4 88 118 10.5 38 173 10

[Model - CC - HP - top speed - 0>60 - MPG

[Edited on 26-05-2004 by Adam]

  <<  1    2    3  >>
New Topic

New Poll

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » just picked up a tigra. 22 database queries in 0.2010398 seconds