Jas
Member
Registered: 13th Oct 04
Location: Mid Wales
User status: Offline
|
When I'm home from work,
what did your dad say?
|
Jas
Member
Registered: 13th Oct 04
Location: Mid Wales
User status: Offline
|
After all this bickering.. Barnshaw just text me saying he loves the game and he's about to prestige, he's playing under a different username his username is Matdav
|
Joey 1.6 sport
Member
Registered: 23rd Oct 11
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
Cod top game 
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
Geeks.
|
JonnyJ
Member
Registered: 23rd Sep 05
Location: Scotchland
User status: Offline
|
The thing that i love most about BF3 over any COD game is the fact that everytime you play a map, its different. You know on COD that the map will never change so you find a route or tactic that suits, then just repeat and repeat. Boring after a while.
On BF3 the map constantly changes and evolves, you have to do new things each time because that spot/route you thought was awesome in the last game might be blown up/blocked by a tank.
I also dont get this "camping" nonsense peope are going on about on BF3, i really don't see it. Infact ive found the best way to play the game is to keep moving, stay still for a few minutes in this game and your dead. If there is some camper on a hillside they are easy targets, just drive a tank or vehicle round the back of them and knife the fuckers 
Knifing on COD is also wank. How can a guy with knife beat a guy with a gun when hes running straight at him? Last night some guy grabbed me and was about to knife me in the chest but mwg shot him just before the knife went in, I didnt die, he did 
COD has its place, its an arcade game and i LOVED gun game on BO. I wouldnt buy it just for that though, £40 for what is a glorified map pack (which they will then rip you off further later on charging another £20 for more maps, free on BF3) doesnt do it for me im afraid.
|
Bissmire
Member
Registered: 30th Sep 08
User status: Offline
|
So I think its fair to say COD is the better game overall
|
JonnyJ
Member
Registered: 23rd Sep 05
Location: Scotchland
User status: Offline
|
Yep
|
Matty W
Member
Registered: 31st Jan 11
Location: Ashton-in-Makerfield, Greater Manchester
User status: Offline
|
if you want to settle this, have a meet next year for a game of airsoft or paintball, BF3 guys on 1 team and MW3 lot on the other
|
BarnshaW
Member
Registered: 25th Oct 06
User status: Offline
|
but what if the MW3 guys set out their exploding dogs or something?
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
No exploding dogs in MW3 m8.
|
JonnyJ
Member
Registered: 23rd Sep 05
Location: Scotchland
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Nath
No exploding dogs in MW3 m8.
How do you explain this then?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hge9sF51gE
Clear as day to me
|
BarnshaW
Member
Registered: 25th Oct 06
User status: Offline
|
|
cunningham
Member
Registered: 25th May 05
Location: Lochore, Fife
User status: Offline
|
Ill hold my hands up ive been a die hard cod fan since the very first one came out on the pc. United offensive was by far the best having vehicles and very good game modes. Played MW2 till 7-8 prestige.
For some reason other than single player im not fussed for MW3 and even then ive heard the storys good but ends shit not sure if true.
I might rent MW3 for single player, but BF3 imo offers more unique games with vehicles and classes that are all required for teamwork. Ive also played all the BF and thing this is best to date
|
Ojc
Member
Registered: 14th Nov 00
Location: Reading: Drives : Clio 197
User status: Offline
|
I sit here watching Brad playing MW3 and dispair at how shit it is
|
Adam_B
Member
Registered: 13th Dec 00
Location: Lancashire
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Proving that the war between Activision’s Call of Duty: Modern Warefare 3 and EA’s Battlefield 3 continues to rage, video game-focused social networking service Raptr has released some interesting stats about how the two games are being received by fans.
In terms of playtime, Modern Warfare 3 has come out on top so far. On their respective launch days, Xbox 360 owners spent 40% more time with MW3 (6.19 hours average) versus Battlefield 3 (4.45 hours average), and during their first weeks, MW3 (20.45 hours average) was still ahead of Battlefield 3 (17.37 hours average) by 17%.
As a result of that, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 has accumulated more total playtime in its first week than Battlefield 3 did in its first three weeks.
However, all is not lost for Battlefield 3 fans. In Raptr’s opinion data, 81% of respondents had been more excited about the launch of Battlefield 3 than the launch of Modern Warfare 3, 92% considered DICE to be more innovative than Infinity Ward, and 58% thought Battlefield 3 had a bigger impact on the FPS genre than Modern Warfare 3 did.
|
Ojc
Member
Registered: 14th Nov 00
Location: Reading: Drives : Clio 197
User status: Offline
|
It's because people that buy battlefield are at work all day not like the kids playing MW3 and UNi students sat around in their pants
|
Dan
Premium Member
Registered: 22nd Apr 02
Location: Gorleston on Sea, Norfolk
User status: Offline
|
Also its based on Xbox users. All of which are retarded, so play shit games
Adult GiftsClick here to vist us
|
XSIHardy
Member
Registered: 5th Feb 08
User status: Offline
|
I loved COD when I was younger spent hours on it,but now I find it boring and I am tired off the constant battle getting shot as soon as you spawn ect
I tried the beta out for battlefield and even though it was buggy and had no jets/cars ect I loved it
Might be wrong in saying this but maybe battlefields more for the older generation ones who dont have the attention span of a 6 year old
|
BarnshaW
Member
Registered: 25th Oct 06
User status: Offline
|
thats exactly right hardy
|
Jas
Member
Registered: 13th Oct 04
Location: Mid Wales
User status: Offline
|
You can't go for 10 seconds without seeing enemy on MW3 therefore the attention span thing is bullshit, you always have to be on your toes especially in games like SND. Battlefield on the other hand. some games modes. if they have all objectives you have to spawn about 2 minutes away from a flag, and if there isn't a vehicle available its ridiculous
|
Mattb
Member
Registered: 2nd Feb 03
Location: Under your sisters bed
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Jas
quote:
Originally posted by A2H GO
MW3 is shit so it wouldnt be hard for anything to be better than it yet I'd still rather it over BF. Theres a massive gap in the market right now to catch all those people who think COD is shit yet still play it or resort to BF.
Gap in the market for those who can't play mw3
over $775 million in 5 days.
Battlefield blog headline...
"Battlefield 3 sells 2 million copies in October in the US"
That $775 million is for the same number of copies as MW2 apparently
|
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Jas
You can't go for 10 seconds without seeing enemy on MW3 therefore the attention span thing is bullshit, you always have to be on your toes especially in games like SND. Battlefield on the other hand. some games modes. if they have all objectives you have to spawn about 2 minutes away from a flag, and if there isn't a vehicle available its ridiculous
You just proved his point about the attention span thing TBH
|
JonnyJ
Member
Registered: 23rd Sep 05
Location: Scotchland
User status: Offline
|
Jas fail 
|
BarnshaW
Member
Registered: 25th Oct 06
User status: Offline
|
will doyle owns MW3 for the PS3, says it all really
|
JonnyJ
Member
Registered: 23rd Sep 05
Location: Scotchland
User status: Offline
|
It can now be a comeback for anything they throw at bf3.
Will doyle owns MW3, your argument is invalid.
|
