Russ 
Member 
 
Registered: 14th Mar 04
 Location: Armchair 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
Here's my quick effort, just installed it in aperture, so not really messed with the settings. 
 
  
 
 
Sorry for watermark 
 
 
  
 
[Edited on 19-11-2010 by Russ]
 | 
Steve 
Premium Member
 
Registered: 30th Mar 02
 Location: Worcestershire             Drives: Defender 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
good shit blud, try maing the darkest image a lower exposure
 | 
Russ 
Member 
 
Registered: 14th Mar 04
 Location: Armchair 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
2nd attempt, just for you steve 
 
  
 
 | 
Steve 
Premium Member
 
Registered: 30th Mar 02
 Location: Worcestershire             Drives: Defender 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
you could get some awesome toning with that cloud 
 
what do people think of this adustment? 
 
  
 
better/worse?
 | 
Steve 
Premium Member
 
Registered: 30th Mar 02
 Location: Worcestershire             Drives: Defender 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
Simon 
Member 
 
Registered: 24th Apr 03
 Location: Oxfordshire 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
Nothing on this page is particularly 'HDR', which Isn't such a bad thing, I think it's all a bit of a gimmick, same as spot colouring 
 | 
Ian 
Site Administrator
 
Registered: 28th Aug 99
 Location: Liverpool 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
The boat to me looks desaturated and lacking in contrast. 
 
The night stuff is nice but I think a properly lit scene would be a good substitute for post-processing, particularly in hdr51.jpg 
 
That one for me either needs more light in the foreground or cropping so you've just got the bridge and the silhouette of trees around it.  Don't think the differing colour temps of the bridge and apartment lights help.
 | 
Steve 
Premium Member
 
Registered: 30th Mar 02
 Location: Worcestershire             Drives: Defender 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
quote: Originally posted by Simon 
Nothing on this page is particularly 'HDR', which Isn't such a bad thing, I think it's all a bit of a gimmick, same as spot colouring  
   
 
Gimmicky maybe, but a lot of it is definately hdr, maybe not so much on this 2nd page, but the 1st page images defiantely are
 | 
Steve 
Premium Member
 
Registered: 30th Mar 02
 Location: Worcestershire             Drives: Defender 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
quote: Originally posted by Ian 
 
The night stuff is nice but I think a properly lit scene would be a good substitute for post-processing,  
   
 
i agree i want to mainly use it where proper lighting isnt possible, such as under an archway with an image in the foreground that becomes over exposed when capturing the details of the arch 
 
most of this stuff I have done is just experimenting to allow me to find the best settings for when a situation does arise 
 | 
Simon 
Member 
 
Registered: 24th Apr 03
 Location: Oxfordshire 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
quote: Originally posted by Steve 
quote: Originally posted by Simon 
Nothing on this page is particularly 'HDR', which Isn't such a bad thing, I think it's all a bit of a gimmick, same as spot colouring  
   
 
Gimmicky maybe, but a lot of it is definately hdr, maybe not so much on this 2nd page, but the 1st page images defiantely are 
   
 
Yeah first page are more so
 | 
Steve 
Premium Member
 
Registered: 30th Mar 02
 Location: Worcestershire             Drives: Defender 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
Back to sensible proper HDR, and one i did of my missus mates kitchen through to the lounge 
 
  
 
[Edited on 20-11-2010 by Steve]
 | 
Simon 
Member 
 
Registered: 24th Apr 03
 Location: Oxfordshire 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
See, this is one of my problems with HDR.  Not a very interesting photo to start with, just with the 'HDR' effect applied. 
 
Your night images above are nice photos without needing any effects to them
 | 
Steve 
Premium Member
 
Registered: 30th Mar 02
 Location: Worcestershire             Drives: Defender 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
all just experimentation   they arent meant to be interesting really just showing how the effect is used. Look at the range of exposures at the bottom, the lights flare out on all but the darkest image but you lose most other details on the dark exposure. HDR allows to produce an image without flared lights but showing all other details 
 
soon i will go somewhere interesting that needs hdr to produce a decent image. 
 
will feature locations like under a darkened bridge with interesting stonework but also with a subject outside the bridge where taking a range of exposures will lead to one detail or another being lost depending on the choice of exposure, but hdr will allow to take the pick from a range of exposures so all details will be visible. 
 
wait and see then youl see why this has its uses 
 
 
[Edited on 20-11-2010 by Steve]
 | 
Lawrah 
Premium Member
 
Registered: 25th Dec 04
 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
Out my back.. 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Not reallly.
 | 
Steve 
Premium Member
 
Registered: 30th Mar 02
 Location: Worcestershire             Drives: Defender 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
cool blud 
 
getting there with this shit 
 
  
 
[Edited on 20-11-2010 by Steve]
 | 
Butler 
Member 
 
Registered: 2nd Jun 05
 Location: London 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
Whats gimmicky about it? Most of the pros on our magazine use HDR to boost the sky, you wouldnt be able to tell immediately though when its really well done.
 | 
Steve 
Premium Member
 
Registered: 30th Mar 02
 Location: Worcestershire             Drives: Defender 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
like this blud? 
 
 
 | 
Simon 
Member 
 
Registered: 24th Apr 03
 Location: Oxfordshire 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
I think that's the thing, when its used properly you can't really notice it. It's the images that are completely over processed that I think are gimmicky. But that seems to be the effect that lots of people like getting. Just for me that effect has been done to death now
 | 
Steve 
Premium Member
 
Registered: 30th Mar 02
 Location: Worcestershire             Drives: Defender 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
yeah im after using it properly, done a view dramatic ones just for the sake of fucking about. 
 
when i get some proper location pics they will be done right, hopefully lol
 | 
Butler 
Member 
 
Registered: 2nd Jun 05
 Location: London 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
I know what you mean Simon, its hard to find that middle ground. Nice shot Steve. You got an SLR now?
 | 
Steve 
Premium Member
 
Registered: 30th Mar 02
 Location: Worcestershire             Drives: Defender 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
Quite like this one i done, apart from the undesirable light flare that came out 
 
 
 | 
Steve 
Premium Member
 
Registered: 30th Mar 02
 Location: Worcestershire             Drives: Defender 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
  
 
[Edited on 21-11-2010 by Steve]
 | 
Lawrah 
Premium Member
 
Registered: 25th Dec 04
 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
I like that one. MOODY!!
 | 
Steve 
Premium Member
 
Registered: 30th Mar 02
 Location: Worcestershire             Drives: Defender 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
nother similar one 
 
 
 | 
AdZ9 
Member 
 
Registered: 14th Apr 06
 
User status: Offline 
 
 | 
 
Love the two last ones, not soon keen on the rest, but as you say its experimentation
 |