corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Off Day » Geek Day » Cheap Switch » Post Reply

Post Reply
Who Can Post? All users can post new topics and all users can reply.
Icon:
Formatting Mode:
Normal
Advanced
Help

Insert Bold text Insert Italicized text Insert Underlined text Insert Centered text Insert a Hyperlink Insert Email Hyperlink Insert an Image Insert Code Formatted text Insert Quoted text
Message:
HTML is Off
Smilies are On
BB Code is On
[img] Code is On
Post Options: Disable smileys?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email notification of new replies?

willay

posted on 15th Sep 14 at 08:48

easier management, voip devices don't have to listen to all the broadcast shite happening in the 'main' vlan


Bart

posted on 13th Sep 14 at 11:43

Is there any real benefit to segregating the VOIP traffic for say.... 30-40 users?


VrsTurbo

posted on 13th Sep 14 at 09:05

If you want to segregate the VoIP traffic into it's own vlan for network qos etc. if you don't have it already then I wouldn't worry as you'll be needing to reconfigure a few things


Bart

posted on 12th Sep 14 at 19:24

quote:
Originally posted by VrsTurbo
Layer3?


Not sure.... Currently using 3x GS748T's (without the VOIP equipment).
What benefits do layer3 bring?


VrsTurbo

posted on 12th Sep 14 at 18:12

Layer3?


Bart

posted on 12th Sep 14 at 14:25

without necessarily needing a "cheap switch", any recommendations for a specific switch to the following specs;

-48 Port gigabit
-POE (for VOIP phones to be connected)
-Stackable (with a decent transfer rate).

I think I should be looking at Procurve or Cisco, but any particular models?


Kyle T

posted on 4th Sep 14 at 14:05

quote:
Originally posted by willay
We use exclusively Cisco POE phones with HP PoE switches, we have 0 issues.


I've been told that Cisco phones CAN be flakey on non-Cisco networks but never witnessed it myself, as we keep buying Cisco!

I'm not sure if it's just something I've noticed, but Cisco "people" seem irrationally brand loyal and it doesn't surprise me that rumours circulate about things without it ever being the case in a production environment!

A wee update on my situation, I've talked the options through with the business and although 8 x $2000 is not a large amount of money on the scale of the project - they've opted to settle for radio comms in those buildings. Yay for me, but I imagine I'll be revisiting that decision in a few months...


John

posted on 4th Sep 14 at 06:57

Cisco guys setting it all up must have been idiots (completely plausible)


willay

posted on 4th Sep 14 at 06:50

We use exclusively Cisco POE phones with HP PoE switches, we have 0 issues.


John

posted on 3rd Sep 14 at 22:24

Cisco phones/systems are funny with non Cisco switches.


Nismo

posted on 3rd Sep 14 at 22:21

Ive never really had any issues with the 300 series.

I have in the last 18 months deployed over 700 Netgear GS110TP in to a retail environment and had all but 2 failures (6 months after install) good switches for a good price.

http://www.comms-express.com/products/netgear-gs110tp/

And lifetime warranty :thumbs:


John

posted on 3rd Sep 14 at 19:51

I've got some newer lower end Cisco phone system/router things and I greatly dislike them. They aren't that much more stable than another random brand.


pow

posted on 3rd Sep 14 at 19:48

I had an ASA that used to shut the Fa ports down whenever it felt like it. Never got to the bottom of it.


Kyle T

posted on 3rd Sep 14 at 15:44

quote:
Originally posted by willay
quote:
Originally posted by Kyle T
Yeah Cisco is lifetime too.

Power blocks are an option, but I get the feeling that PoE isn't driving my price up much - it's the fibre uplink ports (or capability of running them).

GBICs are just a stupid amount of money, there are non-cisco ones for a bit cheaper but had a few of those fail on me, or just not even work in the first place.

In hindsight, I should have had them run 2pair copper to the satellite buildings and then run an ATA or similar and some crappy analogue phones. Hey-ho.


Lots of people use third party gbics with no issues, I cant comment personally but its in wide use.


Seems even Cisco stuff ain't reliable anymore, had an ASA just drop dead at a satellite office today meaning no internet, no DHCP and no VPN back to base. Luckily I happened to be at that Satellite so swapped it out for a 1921 I just happened to have knocking around...


willay

posted on 3rd Sep 14 at 07:21

quote:
Originally posted by Kyle T
Yeah Cisco is lifetime too.

Power blocks are an option, but I get the feeling that PoE isn't driving my price up much - it's the fibre uplink ports (or capability of running them).

GBICs are just a stupid amount of money, there are non-cisco ones for a bit cheaper but had a few of those fail on me, or just not even work in the first place.

In hindsight, I should have had them run 2pair copper to the satellite buildings and then run an ATA or similar and some crappy analogue phones. Hey-ho.


Lots of people use third party gbics with no issues, I cant comment personally but its in wide use.


willay

posted on 3rd Sep 14 at 07:20

the small stuff isn't 'proper' cisco, afaik there isnt much access to IOS (its quite cut down), its just not what you'd expect from standard IOS devices imo.


pow

posted on 2nd Sep 14 at 23:12

There are problems with the 300 series stuff...

One site where cost is an issue I'm using netgear prosafes and they are good as gold.


Kyle T

posted on 2nd Sep 14 at 22:27

Crikey, good find - never looked at the small business stuff before, why is it so cheap?!


Nismo

posted on 2nd Sep 14 at 20:19

Cisco small business 300 series?

http://www.comms-express.com/categories/cisco-10-100-switches-300-series-with-poe-poe/



[Edited on 02-09-2014 by Nismo]


Kyle T

posted on 2nd Sep 14 at 18:08

Yeah Cisco is lifetime too.

Power blocks are an option, but I get the feeling that PoE isn't driving my price up much - it's the fibre uplink ports (or capability of running them).

GBICs are just a stupid amount of money, there are non-cisco ones for a bit cheaper but had a few of those fail on me, or just not even work in the first place.

In hindsight, I should have had them run 2pair copper to the satellite buildings and then run an ATA or similar and some crappy analogue phones. Hey-ho.


willay

posted on 2nd Sep 14 at 16:04

for non Cisco stuff, a HP E2610 might do the job if they still sell them. We have them here as edge switches (I hate them), but they do 24/48 port configs with or without PoE, and all the other stuff you need. Very cheap in comparison and have lifetime warranty (though I read in some places that cisco do lifetime warranty if you bought it new?)


willay

posted on 2nd Sep 14 at 16:01

Stick with Cisco if you can get away with, if there is only one phone per building why not just fork out the £15 for the power block?


Kyle T

posted on 2nd Sep 14 at 15:56

I need some cheap switches, they need the following:

At least a couple of PoE interfaces
Support VLANs and Spanning-Tree
Have two interfaces to allow SingleMode LC fibre

I've basically got a site with 8 buildings, all connected via fibre. My Network/IT/CME equipment is in Building 1, I've got an additional switch in building 2 as this will become the office environment, but for safety purposes I may need an IP phone in every other building.

It may be a SINGLE phone in the other buildings, and based on the 2960 switches I usually buy it's probably going to be $2k per building, just for one phone :lol:

I thought about Fibre convertors, but they're not very scalable - though you can get PoE ones apparently.

I mention two fibre interfaces because the buildings are in a Fibre ring, so for redundancy I'll be linking the whole lot around - also hence the Spanning Tree.

I've NEVER shopped for non-Cisco stuff before, but wondered if there are any cheaper solutions around for what I need. I'm pretty sure it's the fibre that's killing me, as the bloody GBICs cost as much as some of the smaller switches.