corsasport.co.uk
  Not logged in [Login - Register]  
You Are Not Registered Or Not Logged In  

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » clio 16v's?


New Topic
New Poll 		  <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >> Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.


Author clio 16v's?
Sooty
Banned
Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
3rd Aug 03 at 14:20   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
a VTS is quicker than a clio16v standard.
wainey
Member
Registered: 20th Oct 02
Location: walsall west midlands
User status: Offline
3rd Aug 03 at 14:25   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
saxo vts 127 bhp, clio 16v 137 bhp! u may be gettin confused with the clio rsi which is also the 1.8! im yet to see a standard vts beat a clio valve mate!
Sooty
Banned
Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
3rd Aug 03 at 14:26   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
where did you get 127bhp for a VTS from

its 120bhp.. and is significently lighter... Don't tell me a clio valver will not nail 60 in 7.7
nik
Member
Registered: 19th Jun 00
User status: Offline
3rd Aug 03 at 14:26   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
No the VTS will be quicker.
wainey
Member
Registered: 20th Oct 02
Location: walsall west midlands
User status: Offline
3rd Aug 03 at 14:29   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
is it? thought they were 127bhp, lad round the block had one and said his was standard and 127horses, dont pay any interest to saxos really, ill stand corrected, id still rather have a clio valve as i think they look better!
Sooty
Banned
Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
3rd Aug 03 at 14:31   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
actually, I think they look pretty shit, just my opinion... boxy and rear is a bit ew. Some VTS's came out with varying bhp for unknown reason's. Clio's dont do anything for me, the williams is nice though if your into that car
luca2020
Member
Registered: 26th May 02
Location: Maidstone, Kent
User status: Offline
3rd Aug 03 at 14:32   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
dident read all this post, but the clio ur looking at will beat a vts, so why would u want to buy a fast car, then not to far in the future get a slower car?
Sooty
Banned
Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
3rd Aug 03 at 14:36   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
With those modifications it will beat a VTS... standard they will not

Those mods will have it running same sort of speeds as a williams I would have thought
wainey
Member
Registered: 20th Oct 02
Location: walsall west midlands
User status: Offline
3rd Aug 03 at 14:39   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
everythings down to personal taste at the end of the day, yeh saxos are quick but as the clio to u saxos just dont appeal to me! used to get wasted by both in my corsa, give them a bit of a surprise now though!
Sooty
Banned
Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
3rd Aug 03 at 14:52   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Id get a 106gti over a VTS
Cole
Member
Registered: 11th Nov 02
Location: eastbourne Drives:zafira sold now a qashqai
User status: Offline
3rd Aug 03 at 17:59   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
my old clio used to see away my mates vts and sooty you say a williams looks better than a clio16v they are exactly the same just the wiliams has 2ltr 16v and gold wheels and a saxo lighter than a clio the whole front end on a clio is fibreglass only heavy thing on that car was the engine
sxi boy
Member
Registered: 11th Apr 02
Location: north east Drives: clio 182
User status: Offline
3rd Aug 03 at 20:22   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
the clio 16v will beat a vts to 100 and top end yes

clio 16v - 0-60: 7.7, 0-100: 22, 130mph top end, 980kg

saxo vts - 0-60: 7.7, 0-100: 23, 126mph, 950kg

williams and 16v both have same bodywork but different wheels and obviously the 'williams' stickers

nik
Member
Registered: 19th Jun 00
User status: Offline
3rd Aug 03 at 22:50   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Not forgetting most 16v's are 10 years old or more now. Standard for standard the VTS should beat it all round. Not a lot in it though
Ardencorsa
Member
Registered: 24th Mar 02
Location: Chelmsford Essex
User status: Offline
3rd Aug 03 at 22:55   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Clio 16v's are v.nice, Really wanted one.
but got an rt instead, can be made to look very nice.
Sooty
Banned
Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
3rd Aug 03 at 22:57   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
mmmm those are the wheels I want on MR2
Ardencorsa
Member
Registered: 24th Mar 02
Location: Chelmsford Essex
User status: Offline
3rd Aug 03 at 22:58   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
They would look quality on an Mr2, you want Na or turbo one?
Wheels are a bit of a bitch to clean tho.
Sooty
Banned
Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
3rd Aug 03 at 23:08   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
N/A 17's HKS bits and bob's and a nice subtle extensions round the skirts
Ardencorsa
Member
Registered: 24th Mar 02
Location: Chelmsford Essex
User status: Offline
3rd Aug 03 at 23:18   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
your right, its all about smooth and subtle styling. HKS/blitz gear has to be had on an mr2.
Sooty
Banned
Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
3rd Aug 03 at 23:18   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
its gotta be done hasnt it
nik
Member
Registered: 19th Jun 00
User status: Offline
3rd Aug 03 at 23:23   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
1 back and sides please
sxi boy
Member
Registered: 11th Apr 02
Location: north east Drives: clio 182
User status: Offline
4th Aug 03 at 00:01   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by nik
Not forgetting most 16v's are 10 years old or more now. Standard for standard the VTS should beat it all round. Not a lot in it though


clio is faster in a straight line, saxo handles better
Sooty
Banned
Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
4th Aug 03 at 00:14   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Chris I want you in a straight line
sxi boy
Member
Registered: 11th Apr 02
Location: north east Drives: clio 182
User status: Offline
4th Aug 03 at 00:42   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Gambit
Member
Registered: 5th Jun 00
Location: Common Sense HQ
User status: Offline
4th Aug 03 at 08:49   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
what are the weights of the VTS & the 16v??
Kris TD
Member
Registered: 25th Mar 02
Location: Ware, Hertfordshire
User status: Offline
4th Aug 03 at 09:00   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
ask for the origanal airbox cos cone filters slow them things down, mate has just bought a standard one, jesus that things quick

  <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
New Topic
New Poll

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » clio 16v's? 22 database queries in 0.0156310 seconds