BarnshaW
Member
Registered: 25th Oct 06
User status: Offline
|
out of interest, how do they obtain so much power out a small capacity engine?
|
sand-eel
Member
Registered: 15th Mar 07
Location: carluke/braidwood--IRNBRULAND
User status: Offline
|
high revs, well designed airbox, head, no cams (less friction) valves are pneumatic I think.
|
sand-eel
Member
Registered: 15th Mar 07
Location: carluke/braidwood--IRNBRULAND
User status: Offline
|
very very fine tolerances, when the engine is cold it is literally seazed.
|
willay
Moderator Organiser: South East, National Events Premium Member
Registered: 10th Nov 02
Location: Roydon, Essex
User status: Offline
|
mapped by dave a, run on optimax unleaded, drilled airbox.
|
sand-eel
Member
Registered: 15th Mar 07
Location: carluke/braidwood--IRNBRULAND
User status: Offline
|
k+n panel filter as well iirc.
|
BarnshaW
Member
Registered: 25th Oct 06
User status: Offline
|
not a genuine BMC CDA?
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
Resistor chip
|
Jake
Member
Registered: 24th Jan 05
User status: Offline
|
ecu cooling fan
|
Bonney
Member
Registered: 14th Nov 04
Location: St Helens
User status: Offline
|
Smoothed airbox, with a hint of vtec
|
alan-g-w
Member
Registered: 9th Nov 07
Location: Glasgow
User status: Offline
|
Lol, I was actually looking forward to this turning into a good thread. What capacity are the engines?
|
BarnshaW
Member
Registered: 25th Oct 06
User status: Offline
|
alan i was looking for a real answer, stupid me really lol
|
danbear
Member
Registered: 10th Jul 09
Location: Hertfordshire
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by alan-g-w
Lol, I was actually looking forward to this turning into a good thread. What capacity are the engines?
1.0 12v na i think they're 3.5 v8's but not 100%
|
patmore
Member
Registered: 23rd Feb 09
Location: Witham, Essex
User status: Offline
|
i thought they were a v10 n/a
|
ed
Member
Registered: 10th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
2.4l V8. There are other specs for the bore size and stroke length.
|
AK
Member
Registered: 5th Jul 00
Location: Aberdeen City
User status: Offline
|
revs.....
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
I think they are all V8's now.
|
Mertin
Member
Registered: 12th Oct 05
Location: Scotland
User status: Offline
|
As ed said, 2400cc V8 na
Taken from
http://www.f1technical.net/articles/4
|
patmore
Member
Registered: 23rd Feb 09
Location: Witham, Essex
User status: Offline
|
dont they rev to 24000 or somthing stupid like that ??
|
patmore
Member
Registered: 23rd Feb 09
Location: Witham, Essex
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Mertin
As ed said, 2400cc V8 na
Taken from
http://www.f1technical.net/articles/4
I LOVE DRY SUMPS MMMMMMMMMMMM
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by patmore
dont they rev to 24000 or somthing stupid like that ??
18k limited
|
DizzyRebel
Member
Registered: 2nd Jan 09
Location: Lincoln
User status: Offline
|
the old turbo bmw engines were about 1200bhp iirc
|
tom130691
Premium Member
Registered: 13th Sep 08
Location: Daventry
User status: Offline
|
there conrods a tiny so it revs more
|
Mattb
Member
Registered: 2nd Feb 03
Location: Under your sisters bed
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by DizzyRebel
the old turbo bmw engines were about 1200bhp iirc
and 1.5 litres!! lolololol.
|
Ben G
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 07
Location: Essex
User status: Offline
|
what would win in the twistes between a civic type r always in v-tec, 106 gti and a 2009 f1 car? 
the amount of power they achieve out of a relatively small capacity engine is unbelieveable, although they only last a few races before being sacked off for a new one.
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
Thing is... believe it or not a F1 car only has 203 lb ft of torque 
but that torque is carried all the way up to 18,000 rpm - which gives such a high bhp figure. Remember (torque * revs) / 5252 = bhp figure.
So (203 * 18000) / 5252 = 700 ish bhp.
So why is it so quick with such low torque I hear you cry?
Obv the car is light, but by having a engine that revs to 18000 - you can run really short gear ratios (which require less torque force to rotate and thus accelerate quicker).
for example, if you imagine a F1 car in 1st gear does say 50 mph (no idea what they do in 1st to be honest)
Then 50 mph @ 18000 in 1st means 2.7 mph per 1000 rpm. Imagine this on a normal car, at 5,000 rpm you'd only be doing about 12 mph in 1st gear.
|