Robin
Premium Member
Registered: 7th Jan 04
Location: Northants Drives: Clio 182 Cup
User status: Offline
|
Am I the only one who thinks it's a bit extreme that ISPs are banning the Wikipedia link to a topic about an album because it has a pre pubescent naked girl on the cover posing like this?
Are they planning on banning the link to Nirvana's Nevermind too?
Closet paedophile crew, this is your thread....
|
Mobby
Member
Registered: 31st Dec 07
Location: Leicestershire
User status: Offline
|
its out of hand these days!!!
|
_Allan_
Member
Registered: 24th Mar 04
User status: Offline
|
What album cover?, I can't read mine 
|
Robin
Premium Member
Registered: 7th Jan 04
Location: Northants Drives: Clio 182 Cup
User status: Offline
|
Virgin Killer by some random band I've never heard of called Scorpions.
Seriously, the Nirvana album cover is worse.
|
ssj_kakarot
Member
Registered: 29th Apr 03
Location: hartlepool
User status: Offline
|
cant see out dont see wat the problem is
|
Skylined
Member
Registered: 27th Sep 05
Location: Sideways, Surrey
User status: Offline
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Virgin_Killer.jpg
|
Bart
Member
Registered: 19th Aug 02
Location: Midsomer Norton, Bristol Avon
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by aPk
Do people really take images they see so seriously?
If so, don't they realise her legs are on backwards?
I have a great sense of humor, and find most things funny, and dont generally get put off by much, I even find Jimmy carrs peodophile jokes hilarious but in this instance, I think its.... sick?:
Thats just wrong in my opinion, I can barely look it 
[Edited on 08-12-2008 by Bart]
|
ssj_kakarot
Member
Registered: 29th Apr 03
Location: hartlepool
User status: Offline
|
y though if you dont harbour any sexual feelings towards children there should be no reason why you cant look at that image without a prblem?
shes not being abused ect
no different to how a young girl wud be at the beach obviously without the ropes lol
[Edited on 08-12-2008 by ssj_kakarot]
|
AndyKent
Member
Registered: 3rd Sep 05
User status: Offline
|
Bart, got the wrong end of the stick there - deleted post.
|
Bart
Member
Registered: 19th Aug 02
Location: Midsomer Norton, Bristol Avon
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by ssj_kakarot
no different to how a young girl wud be at the beach obviously without the ropes lol
She's naked for one... and not of the age you would see a girl naked on the beach.
I dont have any sexual tendancies towards that, its just wrong to look at 
|
Robin
Premium Member
Registered: 7th Jan 04
Location: Northants Drives: Clio 182 Cup
User status: Offline
|
Ropes?
IMO, if that has to be censored, this does too - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nevermind
Both have child nudity on, which is the case for "prosecution" in the Virgin Killer example.
|
ssj_kakarot
Member
Registered: 29th Apr 03
Location: hartlepool
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by aPk
Bart, got the wrong end of the stick there - deleted post.
lol did you think people were complaining about the pic of the actual lego girl ?
|
Robin
Premium Member
Registered: 7th Jan 04
Location: Northants Drives: Clio 182 Cup
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Bart
quote:
Originally posted by ssj_kakarot
no different to how a young girl wud be at the beach obviously without the ropes lol
She's naked for one... and not of the age you would see a girl naked on the beach.
I dont have any sexual tendancies towards that, its just wrong to look at
Children of that age routinely get naked at the beach, she's what, 7? 8? That's quite normal beach behaviour IMO, or would have been, in 1976, or 86, or 96, but today, nooo, you can't have bare nipples if you're a girl, ever.
|
Bart
Member
Registered: 19th Aug 02
Location: Midsomer Norton, Bristol Avon
User status: Offline
|
^^ lol.
Robin, you have a good point.
I feel the nirvana picture is less intrusive, im not sure why?
|
mattk
Member
Registered: 27th Feb 06
Location: St. Helens
User status: Offline
|
You have never heard of Scorpians!
|
ssj_kakarot
Member
Registered: 29th Apr 03
Location: hartlepool
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Robin
Ropes?
IMO, if that has to be censored, this does too - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nevermind
Both have child nudity on, which is the case for "prosecution" in the Virgin Killer example.
ow lol are they not ropes and thats just a strategic crack on the case, looks like i got the wrong end of the stick my self lol, thought the ropes were airbrushed to hid her vadge lol.
ok in that case whilst i believe in freedom of expression and dont believe art using naked children is compleatly wrong i dont understand why they would want to use it lol, well obviously for the publicity its generating guess its working though.
|
AndyKent
Member
Registered: 3rd Sep 05
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by ssj_kakarot
quote:
Originally posted by aPk
Bart, got the wrong end of the stick there - deleted post.
lol did you think people were complaining about the pic of the actual lego girl ?
Maybe
|
Robin
Premium Member
Registered: 7th Jan 04
Location: Northants Drives: Clio 182 Cup
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Bart
^^ lol.
Robin, you have a good point.
I feel the nirvana picture is less intrusive, im not sure why?
Because it's a boy? Because babies are naked sometimes? Because it's not a pose as such?
I can see part of the fuss, it could be seen as a provocative pose, of you want to see it that way
I just think people are over-reacting to something. More people will have seen that image today than in the last 5 years, so it's done exactly the opposite of what "they" wanted to acheive
|
Ste L
Member
Registered: 3rd Jul 06
Location: Manchester Drives: 106 16v Rallye
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Robin
Am I the only one who thinks it's a bit extreme that ISPs are banning the Wikipedia link to a topic about an album because it has a pre pubescent naked girl on the cover posing like this?
if you can read other laguages your alright, can view it in french, polish, just doesn't load up the english version
|
Robin
Premium Member
Registered: 7th Jan 04
Location: Northants Drives: Clio 182 Cup
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by ssj_kakarot
quote:
Originally posted by Robin
Ropes?
IMO, if that has to be censored, this does too - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nevermind
Both have child nudity on, which is the case for "prosecution" in the Virgin Killer example.
ow lol are they not ropes and thats just a strategic crack on the case, looks like i got the wrong end of the stick my self lol, thought the ropes were airbrushed to hid her vadge lol.
ok in that case whilst i believe in freedom of expression and dont believe art using naked children is compleatly wrong i dont understand why they would want to use it lol, well obviously for the publicity its generating guess its working though.
I think the 'cracks' were on the vinyl record sleeve. Wikipedia would say.
|
mattk
Member
Registered: 27th Feb 06
Location: St. Helens
User status: Offline
|
All this peado shit pisses me off, I like amature photography and constantly hear stories of other photographers getting hasseled taking pictures of the seaside or of fairs ect
|
Hammer
Member
Registered: 11th Feb 04
User status: Offline
|
That is wrong imo it's a wee girl naked sticking it on an album cover and calling it art doesn't wash for me, what the fuck were they thinking?
|
Robin
Premium Member
Registered: 7th Jan 04
Location: Northants Drives: Clio 182 Cup
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Hammer
That is wrong imo it's a wee girl naked sticking it on an album cover and calling it art doesn't wash for me, what the fuck were they thinking?
But a naked boy, in water, chasing an american bank note on a fishing line is ok?
|
Hammer
Member
Registered: 11th Feb 04
User status: Offline
|
The brutal truth is there are sick fucks that will get turned on by that wee girl.
A naked baby is a normal image.
|
Ste L
Member
Registered: 3rd Jul 06
Location: Manchester Drives: 106 16v Rallye
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Hammer
The brutal truth is there are sick fucks that will get turned on by that wee girl.
A naked baby is a normal image.
there are some sick fuck's who get off on looking at little boy's though, so there is no difference at all
|
