corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » Miles per gallon confusion??


New Topic

New Poll
  <<  1    2  >> Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.


Author Miles per gallon confusion??
FasT09
Member

Registered: 4th Feb 05
Location: North Yorkshire
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:18   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Checked on parkers and how is this possible??

Clio 172 is 34mpg
206 gti 180 32mpg
Corsa 1.8 SRI 36 mpg

How is the corsa more? it only 1.8 and 123 bhp
Cupra Steve
Banned

Registered: 7th Nov 06
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:19   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

the more the better
Hammer
Member

Registered: 11th Feb 04
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:19   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

You get more miles to the gallon on a smaller less powerful engine, where is the confusion coming in?
dannymccann
Member

Registered: 9th Aug 06
Location: Doddington, Lincolnshire
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:19   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

erm, it should be? less BHP = less power = less consumption?
andy1868
Member

Registered: 22nd Jun 06
Location: Burscough, Lancashire
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:21   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

yes, less consumption means you get more miles to the gallon. its really very simple
FasT09
Member

Registered: 4th Feb 05
Location: North Yorkshire
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:21   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

ye sorry didnt think when wrote. What i mean was how is it so close?
Hammer
Member

Registered: 11th Feb 04
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:24   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Don't take those figures as gospel, they'll be on a combined cycle as with every engine if you rag it you get less mpg and if you drive conservatively you get more.
FasT09
Member

Registered: 4th Feb 05
Location: North Yorkshire
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:27   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

ye but on average they similar?
topshot_2k
Banned

Registered: 1st Dec 03
Location: Northampton Drives: Pug GTi-6
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:28   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Hammer
You get more miles to the gallon on a smaller less powerful engine, where is the confusion coming in?




not true. MY 306 gti (2litre) gets more mpg than my 1.6 16v corsa did (131bhp) witht he exception of stop start queues
Hammer
Member

Registered: 11th Feb 04
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:30   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Ok for the the ones amongst us who wish to be picky and not try and help the guy understand, FOR THE MOST PART engines that are smaller and less powerful return a higher mpg figure
topshot_2k
Banned

Registered: 1st Dec 03
Location: Northampton Drives: Pug GTi-6
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:34   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

gearing, weight in car, driver all affect it. those figures are a very rough guide. and higher MPG means you will drive further without filling up, therefore cheaper to run




*in theory
pdwhelan
Member

Registered: 25th Sep 06
Location: Wigan
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:36   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Keeping the revs down and changing gear sooner rather than later, helps!

Especialy in first gear i would expect, just dont take the piss and crawl to the speed limit, you know when people end up being right up your ass and less people get through the traffic lights
FasT09
Member

Registered: 4th Feb 05
Location: North Yorkshire
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:37   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

I am thinking of getting the clio 172 but the only thing stoping me is obviously the insurance but also the running of it ie petrol. Which is why i may go to 1.8 sri. but looking at figures in mpg should I not worry to much about the difference and look more into insurance
John
Member

Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:37   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

I get fairly high mpg but have a tiny tank, so I have to fill up more regularly than people with worse mpg and a bigger tank, disproving your theory.
topshot_2k
Banned

Registered: 1st Dec 03
Location: Northampton Drives: Pug GTi-6
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:39   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

ok john

172 likes to be driven hard, and when you do it does use a fair bit of fuel.
John
Member

Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:40   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

well you tried to be an arse with the previous comments, I was just shoing you were wrong as well.
--DAN--
Member

Registered: 3rd Feb 03
Location: Bottesford. Drives;3 Series
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:41   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

When driven carefully, work run etc, my Clio Cup would get up to around 38mpg and 42mpg on the motorway.
topshot_2k
Banned

Registered: 1st Dec 03
Location: Northampton Drives: Pug GTi-6
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:42   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by John
well you tried to be an arse with the previous comments, I was just shoing you were wrong as well.



not really. the 3 cars all have similar sized tanks, therefore the one with less mpg is going to be filling up more often.

just becasue you grandad wagon has a milk bottle for a tank doesnt mean it applies to other cars.
topshot_2k
Banned

Registered: 1st Dec 03
Location: Northampton Drives: Pug GTi-6
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:43   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by corsa-dan
When driven carefully, work run etc, my Clio Cup would get up to around 38mpg and 42mpg on the motorway.



what about spirite B road driving
John
Member

Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:43   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Grandad wagon

It's at least as fast as your old pug.
--DAN--
Member

Registered: 3rd Feb 03
Location: Bottesford. Drives;3 Series
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:43   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

15 ish
FasT09
Member

Registered: 4th Feb 05
Location: North Yorkshire
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:45   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by corsa-dan
When driven carefully, work run etc, my Clio Cup would get up to around 38mpg and 42mpg on the motorway.


So it's not as bad as people would imagine. As long as you don't rag it everywhere.

Overall should i not choose a the corsa sri over the clio 172 cause it has less mpg when it not miles off?
topshot_2k
Banned

Registered: 1st Dec 03
Location: Northampton Drives: Pug GTi-6
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:46   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by John
Grandad wagon

It's at least as fast as your old pug.



ok of course it is
topshot_2k
Banned

Registered: 1st Dec 03
Location: Northampton Drives: Pug GTi-6
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:46   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by corsa-dan
15 ish



John
Member

Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
29th Jun 07 at 08:47   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by topshot_2k
quote:
Originally posted by John
Grandad wagon

It's at least as fast as your old pug.



ok of course it is


How far out are the parkers stats for your car then?

I understand they aren't very reilable.

  <<  1    2  >>
New Topic

New Poll

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » Miles per gallon confusion?? 23 database queries in 0.0275249 seconds