Nismo
Member
Registered: 12th Sep 02
User status: Offline
|
For those that watched it sunday, some of you may have seen the news monday morning, people were complaining about it saying it shouldnt have been shown, (see http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6394845.stm)
now low and behold a few days later 1 possibly 2 people are killed on a level crossing... 
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-1253752,00.html
|
Tommy L
Member
Registered: 21st Aug 06
Location: Northampton Drives: Audi wagon
User status: Offline
|
it was a safety warning...i now wear my high visibilty jacket
|
FruitBooTeR
Member
Registered: 18th Jan 07
Location: Wolverhampton Drives: S15
User status: Offline
|
I dont get how u get onto the level crossing in the first place, if the barrier comes down you wait, and if your already crossing it aint gonna come dwn so fast to trap you on there
|
Rachel H
Member
Registered: 12th Nov 03
Location: Berks
User status: Offline
|
People are incredibly stupid in Norwich
|
dna23
Member
Registered: 1st Nov 04
Location: Northamptonshire
User status: Offline
|
I can't understand how anyone can be so fucking stupid as to jump a level crossing. Just wait, it's not worth the risk.
|
Nismo
Member
Registered: 12th Sep 02
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by FruitBooTeR
I dont get how u get onto the level crossing in the first place, if the barrier comes down you wait, and if your already crossing it aint gonna come dwn so fast to trap you on there
there only half barriers most of them, so you only get a barrier on your side of the road.
like so...
|
ed
Member
Registered: 10th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
Was that an attempt of a joke? Or are you an idiot?
|
Tom
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: Wirral, Merseyside
User status: Offline
|
There's alot of people who are gonna have a go at topgear for anything they do just because of the way they do it.
It's good that it was highlighted.
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by KROOZUK-BEN
train was speeding, speed limit is 70mph 
trains should have the same speeding laws as cars IMO.
had to be a vauxhall though didn't it.... first a corsa gets done over by a huge truck, now an astra gets destroyed by a train.
ed, hes a complete idiot. Train was at Line Speed, which is 100MPH. Trains do not have to slow down for level crossings
|
Ben G
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 07
Location: Essex
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by ed
Was that an attempt of a joke? Or are you an idiot?
no, i don't see why trains should be allowed to do 100mph whilst we cna only do 70 legally...
maybe the person wouldn't have died if the train was doing 70? although they most probably still would've
|
ed
Member
Registered: 10th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
That's one of the most stupid things I have ever heard.
Next you'll be saying that aircraft can't travel at 300mph because cars can't 
[Edited on 01-03-2007 by ed]
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
i dont get why theres a problem with this being showed in the aftermath of the cumbiran train crash 
a) there was no fatalities
b) the crash was nothing to do with a train level crossing anyway
|
Ben G
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 07
Location: Essex
User status: Offline
|
when does an aeroplane ever come into contact with a car? unless you've watched too much chitty chitty bang bang?
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
KROOOOOOOOOOOOOZUK-WICKEDBOSELECTA or whoever you are, you are a complete tool of the highest order
|
ed
Member
Registered: 10th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
There was one fatality. But the woman was about 86 anyway.
But was the reason why people complained? People are so fucking touchy these days
|
Mark330d
Member
Registered: 25th Apr 06
Location: Netherlee, Glasgow City
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Steve
i dont get why theres a problem with this being showed in the aftermath of the cumbiran train crash 
a) there was no fatalities
b) the crash was nothing to do with a train level crossing anyway
1 woman died
|
CoastalCorsa
Member
Registered: 7th Jan 05
Location: Lancashire
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Steve
i dont get why theres a problem with this being showed in the aftermath of the cumbiran train crash 
a) there was no fatalities
b) the crash was nothing to do with a train level crossing anyway
Agree with steve, the two are totally unrelated
people need to get a grip and stop being so petty
fucking british are turning into right moaning wankers
|
ed
Member
Registered: 10th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by KROOZUK-BEN
when does an aeroplane ever come into contact with a car? unless you've watched too much chitty chitty bang bang?
An airliner could hit a light aircraft which can only cruise at 100mph. GOing by your logic, airliners should only be able to go as fast as light aircraft.
|
Ben G
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 07
Location: Essex
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Cybermonkey
KROOOOOOOOOOOOOZUK-WICKEDBOSELECTA or whoever you are, you are a complete tool of the highest order
and you are a cyber boy. i'm guessing you like to chat girls up on the internet. not very ''normal'' is it?
|
Tom
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: Wirral, Merseyside
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by KROOZUK-BEN
when does an aeroplane ever come into contact with a car? unless you've watched too much chitty chitty bang bang?
you tool, if people followed the signs, cars would never come into contact with trains.
If we are working on this logic, surely a car could break through a barrier onto a runway
|
Ben G
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 07
Location: Essex
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Tom
quote: Originally posted by KROOZUK-BEN
when does an aeroplane ever come into contact with a car? unless you've watched too much chitty chitty bang bang?
you tool, if people followed the signs, cars would never come into contact with trains.
If we are working on this logic, surely a car could break through a barrier onto a runway
this is england, hardly anyone ''obeys'' signs... and i've never ever in my life heard of a car breaking through a barrier onto a runway...
|
Tom
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: Wirral, Merseyside
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by KROOZUK-BEN
quote: Originally posted by Tom
quote: Originally posted by KROOZUK-BEN
when does an aeroplane ever come into contact with a car? unless you've watched too much chitty chitty bang bang?
you tool, if people followed the signs, cars would never come into contact with trains.
If we are working on this logic, surely a car could break through a barrier onto a runway
this is england, hardly anyone ''obeys'' signs... and i've never ever in my life heard of a car breaking through a barrier onto a runway...
Sorry is this a joke?
Have you ever ignored a level crossing barrier or do you think this is quite normal?
If you actually read what you've written again you'll realise how stupid you sound.
|
Superlite Ltd.
Member
Registered: 9th Jan 07
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Rachel H
People are incredibly stupid in Norwich
ROFLMAO
|
Ben G
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 07
Location: Essex
User status: Offline
|
no i've never ignored a level crossing barrier sign..i was saying signs in general people don't usually read.. now bakc on topic... the top gear stunt. people shouldn't be so idiotic to jump them in the first place...
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by KROOZUK-BEN
quote: Originally posted by Cybermonkey
KROOOOOOOOOOOOOZUK-WICKEDBOSELECTA or whoever you are, you are a complete tool of the highest order
and you are a cyber boy. i'm guessing you like to chat girls up on the internet. not very ''normal'' is it?
i really do not understand your logic
|