rustyarchs
Member
Registered: 29th Aug 04
Location: scotland
User status: Offline
|
right guys the last thread got me wondering 
i like the pics but aint really into photography that much so dont know the first shoot about it,,
throwing aside the price of £70 quid as its not much to me and i feel the 150 prints cost would at least of been a few quids worth
so were the pics really that bad? and if so what was up with them as they looked good to me 
be honest,i wont bite because at least this one wont go off topic 
no bitch comments or snidey faces this time please
|
rustyarchs
Member
Registered: 29th Aug 04
Location: scotland
User status: Offline
|
btw this was jasons fault for making me wonder
|
Jas
Member
Registered: 13th Oct 04
Location: Mid Wales
User status: Offline
|
sorry 
|
rustyarchs
Member
Registered: 29th Aug 04
Location: scotland
User status: Offline
|
no probs buddy,, i appreciated your honesty 
btw dont know if it would make a diffrence to the pics or not but they were taken by a film camera and not a digital one :boogle: ( i wanted film )
[Edited on 17-01-2006 by rustyarchs]
|
Melville
Member
Registered: 4th Jun 03
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
User status: Offline
|
What pictures are you on about
|
Butler
Member
Registered: 2nd Jun 05
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
IMHO I thought they were awesome mate, if the prints are good quality id say it was well worth the cash
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
this thread is pointless without the pics
|
rustyarchs
Member
Registered: 29th Aug 04
Location: scotland
User status: Offline
|
i thought every1 had already seen them on the thread that got spamed and trashed
il try get them later when iv got time
|
