liamC
Member
Registered: 28th Feb 04
User status: Offline
|
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1641476,00.html
New plan for drivers to pay £1.30 a mile
Dipesh Gadher , Transport correspondent
THE government plans to replace fuel tax with a new road charge on motorists based on the distance and time of day they travel.
Alistair Darling, the transport secretary, this weekend indicated that fuel duty will have to be scrapped in order to pave the way for a new road pricing scheme. This would dramatically cut the price of petrol — duty currently accounts for 47p per litre — but motorists would face a new charge of up to £1.34 a mile. Journeys at peak times and on the busiest roads would cost most.
In his first interview since the election, Darling said the changes were necessary to prevent roads reaching “complete gridlock”. He wants a pilot project to be approved during Labour’s third term.
The move, which is also likely to see road tax scrapped, would mark the biggest shake-up in motoring taxation since fuel duty was introduced in 1909.
“The idea of distance[-based] charging is that instead of paying the present form of taxation, you’d be charged on the distance you go,” Darling said.
“You are certainly not talking about a charge on top of another charge. You can’t have both. This would be a completely different concept, a completely different way of doing things.”
Fuel duty on petrol and diesel provides the Treasury with about £22 billion a year. A further £4.6 billion is raised annually through road tax.
Darling is confident that the technology will be in place within the next 10-15 years for a nationwide scheme. A satellite tracking system would monitor black boxes inside every car. “Top-of-the-range cars have got satellite navigation kits fitted almost as standard now,” Darling said.
“In another 10 years I expect every car will be fitted with this equipment. So it makes sense to see whether or not you can’t use that to good advantage and give drivers a better deal.”
Darling will outline government plans to take road pricing forward at a lecture this week organised by the Social Market Foundation think tank.
Although a nationwide scheme would not be introduced for a decade at the earliest, Darling plans to present a bill in the current parliament to set up a pilot project in a large conurbation, such as the West Midlands or Greater Manchester, within “five or six years”.
He says a decision on road pricing will have to be taken “during the course of this parliament”, providing political consensus can be reached across the parties.
“If we don’t do anything it’s pretty clear to me, when you look at all the trends, we would face complete gridlock,” he said.
“More and more cars will grind to a halt and the generations to come will curse those people of my generation who didn’t do anything about it.”
Scrapping fuel duty and road tax is likely to make road pricing more acceptable to motorists. “We’ve got to take the British people with us,” said Darling.
Last year a government- commissioned feasibility study on road pricing concluded that distance-based charges could cut congestion by half.
Drivers would be charged different rates depending on the time of day, their location and the distance travelled.
Charges would start at 2p a mile for rural roads, while journeys on the busiest urban routes would cost up to £1.34 a mile at peak times, according to the study.
The report claimed that about half of drivers would pay less in road charges than they currently do in fuel duty.
“If fuel duty were removed completely . . . [rural drivers] would be paying much less and the other side of the coin is that city dwellers would pay much more,” said Stephen Glaister, professor of transport and infrastructure at Imperial College, London.
Environmental groups fear that replacing existing taxes with distance-based charges would discourage drivers from switching to greener cars. Large gas guzzlers that are less fuel efficient than small vehicles would cost less to run if fuel duty were scrapped.
“If the government scrapped fuel tax and road tax, this would remove incentives for people to buy greener cars and climate change emissions could rise,” said Tony Bosworth of Friends of the Earth.
Last year the number of cars on Britain’s roads was 25.8m. This is set to rise to 31.9m by 2015, according to the Commission for Integrated Transport, which advises the government
[Edited on 05-06-2005 by liamC]
|
Black Stallion SRi
Member
Registered: 9th Dec 04
User status: Offline
|
Sounds good, first mod is to remove black box leave in garage and go for the cheapest drive ever 
|
Mikorsa16v
Member
Registered: 2nd Sep 02
Location: Burgess Hill, West Sussex
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Black Stallion SRi
Sounds good, first mod is to remove black box leave in garage and go for the cheapest drive ever
If road tax and fuel tax are scrapped this would be good...but will never happen, too many cars on the road to be 'converted' to intelligent, also people would rip them out
|
BabyBlade
Member
Registered: 5th Feb 03
Location: Hereford Rides: Ninja 600
User status: Offline
|
feck that 
They should make it legal that anyone living and getting around town should get mini motos, would seriously decrease congestion and make town an easier place to get about
|
K100RSA
Member
Registered: 2nd Apr 02
Location: Devon. drives: too fast
User status: Offline
|
Hmm ok so on current pricing that would make petrol 37p per litre.
so lets look at the figures
now road tax?? about £150 on average
average fuel consumption is probably about 28mpg??, average mileage per year is about 12000
total costing for the year
£1650ish fuel plus tax, about £1800 per year
new costings would be about
fuel 12000 miles £716 of petrol and
if all done at peak times ie commuting etc!!!!!
over £15K of tax!!!! LOL
yeah real good idea for someone this
|
Carr
Member
Registered: 1st Oct 04
Location: Leicestershire (Home) Ambleside, Lakes (Uni)
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by liamC
“In another 10 years I expect every car will be fitted with this equipment. So it makes sense to see whether or not you can’t use that to good advantage and give drivers a better deal.”
Also as if they will just use it for tax they'll monitor peoples speed aswell bunch of thieving fuckers 
|
|
