Corsa_SeXi
Member
Registered: 5th Mar 04
Location: Manchester
User status: Offline
|
Hey people, can u tell me if there is anyway of removing lyrics from a song or at least reducing the sound of em so i can just have the back ground beat
|
dave17
Member
Registered: 3rd Sep 02
Location: Greater London
User status: Offline
|
its hard to do mate, been making music for years and itl never sound right IMO, jus makes it sound flat and shitty. better off searching for an instrumental.
|
Corsa_SeXi
Member
Registered: 5th Mar 04
Location: Manchester
User status: Offline
|
well if thats the case. I no its a long shot but has anyone got the instrumental to 2pac - all out. The version off until the end of time. I posted this on a tupac board and haven't got it so it will probably be the same here. Cheers
|
infinitycorsa
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: Stourport-on-Severn, Hereford and Worcester
User status: Offline
|
why dont u use the kaeoke mode on nero this will take some of the lyrics out
|
Dom
Member
Registered: 13th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
invert one of the channels and layer it over the other with it being about a ms out of phase - that will give you the vocals. Then bounce that down to identical stereo pair, invert and layer it over the original - that should cut alot of the centre out (if memory serves me right) from the stereo field, so you should be left with things panned either side - so some kind of instrumental etc
but no, your never going to beable to get a a clean instrumental from the original - your better of getting whole of a copy 
[Edited on 22-02-2005 by Dom]
|
dave17
Member
Registered: 3rd Sep 02
Location: Greater London
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Dom
invert one of the channels and layer it over the other with it being about a ms out of phase - that will give you the vocals. Then bounce that down to identical stereo pair, invert and layer it over the original - that should cut alot of the centre out (if memory serves me right) from the stereo field, so you should be left with things panned either side - so some kind of instrumental etc
but no, your never going to beable to get a a clean instrumental from the original - your better of getting whole of a copy
[Edited on 22-02-2005 by Dom]
so basically what i jus said then eh 
|
Dom
Member
Registered: 13th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Dave17
quote:
Originally posted by Dom
invert one of the channels and layer it over the other with it being about a ms out of phase - that will give you the vocals. Then bounce that down to identical stereo pair, invert and layer it over the original - that should cut alot of the centre out (if memory serves me right) from the stereo field, so you should be left with things panned either side - so some kind of instrumental etc
but no, your never going to beable to get a a clean instrumental from the original - your better of getting whole of a copy
[Edited on 22-02-2005 by Dom]
so basically what i jus said then eh
something like that all that nero and other programs do is apply an EQ over it that takes out things around the 1k,2.5k and 3k regions - but if they have phasing/chorus/reverb etc then vocals can be spread from anything around 300Hz to 10Khz+, hence why my way does do something a little better.
But yea it sounds cack either way
|
