eskiboy
Member
Registered: 12th Nov 04
User status: Offline
|
any 1 use it on here????? just gettin a copy, is it any good????????
|
Kathryn W
Member
Registered: 12th Oct 03
Location: Widnes, Cheshire
User status: Offline
|
never heared of it.
what actually is it?
|
CorsAsh
Member
Registered: 19th Apr 02
Location: Munich
User status: Offline
|
sound editor isn't it?
|
eskiboy
Member
Registered: 12th Nov 04
User status: Offline
|
its a program where u can make your own beats, mix edit and so on.
|
Swiftie
Member
Registered: 7th Jan 05
Location: Greater London
User status: Offline
|
Its good mate. A few people have said that its limited. But its only as limited as your mind can take you. Not a master of it neither can I say I've used it for longer than 5 mins but if its your 1st time playing about with producing then this will get you started. I know a lot of tunes that have been produced on FL and no body knows the difference untill they're told.
|
Skipz
Member
Registered: 23rd Aug 03
Location: Falkirk: Drives:nothing but gettin another Corsa
User status: Offline
|
i thought you were meaning the breakfast cereal i havent eaten them since i was a kid 
|
Dom
Member
Registered: 13th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
yup i use it. about to change to FL 5 though and try out sonar 
its pretty good mate and its fairly easy to get used to although - i find automation a pain in the arse and the sound engine isnt that good (hence why im looking at sonar) 
but its pretty powerful in its own way though 
swiftie - true you cant always tell the difference, but you'll probably find that they use it mostly as a sampler and then dumb everything out into soundforge etc to be mastered (due to the sound engine in FL being abit weak)...whereas using something like protools, sonar, nuendo, cubase etc the sound engine are bloody excellent so mastering can be taken place within the producing software
|
Swiftie
Member
Registered: 7th Jan 05
Location: Greater London
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Dom
swiftie - true you cant always tell the difference, but you'll probably find that they use it mostly as a sampler and then dumb everything out into soundforge etc to be mastered (due to the sound engine in FL being abit weak)...
Yeah thats true, it will still need to be mixed down and mastered via other means.
People tend to like FL at first because of the ease of use of VST's. But once you know how to manipulate them then you can move on to sw like Cubase, Reason and others 
|
Ginge
Member
Registered: 20th Jan 05
Location: Halifax
User status: Offline
|
why not check out http://rosegardenmusic.com
Its a bitch to set up, but its all free, and its awesome!
[Edited on 22-01-2005 by Ginge]
|
Dom
Member
Registered: 13th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Swiftie
quote:
Originally posted by Dom
swiftie - true you cant always tell the difference, but you'll probably find that they use it mostly as a sampler and then dumb everything out into soundforge etc to be mastered (due to the sound engine in FL being abit weak)...
Yeah thats true, it will still need to be mixed down and mastered via other means.
People tend to like FL at first because of the ease of use of VST's. But once you know how to manipulate them then you can move on to sw like Cubase, Reason and others
aye reason is also good  
ginge - sod linux for music production. A) hardly any decent D\A's support linux, its usually Mac and Windows, B) im sure it can handle midi fine, but soundfonts and VST(i)s and audio will be pretty shocking and c) it looks abit cack.
However, until the day something is developed for linux that handles VSTs, audio and my digidesign gear (protools stuff  ) then im staying with XP, even though it gives me the finger on a regular basis
|
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by h18_oab
i thought you were meaning the breakfast cereal i havent eaten them since i was a kid
They ming
|
