Wolfy
Member
Registered: 1st Apr 02
Location: West Midlands
User status: Offline
|
hijacked it good and proper!
http://www.whitehouse.org
|
drunkenfool
Member
Registered: 7th Feb 03
Location: Hereford Drives: Audi R8 V8
User status: Offline
|
is that the real site or a joke one?
|
CorsAsh
Member
Registered: 19th Apr 02
Location: Munich
User status: Offline
|
likewise...
http://www.georgewbush.org/
|
Wolfy
Member
Registered: 1st Apr 02
Location: West Midlands
User status: Offline
|
real.
|
CorsAsh
Member
Registered: 19th Apr 02
Location: Munich
User status: Offline
|
http://www.whitehouse.org/kids/palm/35.asp
|
ed
Member
Registered: 10th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
I think George W's internet team 'misunderestimated' the ammount of security they needed on thier webservers then 
[Edited on 04-11-2004 by 1800ed]
|
IntaCepta
Member
Registered: 25th Mar 02
Location: Mill Hill East, Greater London
User status: Offline
|
whitehouse would surely have a .gov site.
so
http://www.whitehouse.gov is the real one
|
1600power
Member
Registered: 22nd Apr 04
Location: Shropshire Drives: 1.6 16v Sport
User status: Offline
|
lmfao! lovin those sites and there sooooo true! idiot americans voting him back in
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by IntaCepta
whitehouse would surely have a .gov site.
so
http://www.whitehouse.gov is the real one
I reckon your correct. The White House isnt an organisation.
|
James_DT
Member
Registered: 9th Apr 04
Location: Cambridgeshire
User status: Offline
|
The .gov is correct, like this country uses .gov.uk for such things.
|
John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
Do you really think the site would still be up if it was hacked like that?
|
leeshez
Member
Registered: 3rd May 01
Location: Great Harwood, Lancashire
User status: Offline
|
|