AK
Member
Registered: 5th Jul 00
Location: Aberdeen City
User status: Offline
|
Spec
THE ULTIMATE GTR SKYLINE
LEMANS STYLE GTR33 WIDBODY AS IN NISSAN MUSEUM
BUILT BY INTERNATIONAL RACE CAR BUILDER
only travelled 5000miles since build.
520HP@4WHEELS @1.4bar on pump fuel
650@ 4wheels@1.7 bar on 103octane
this is a 10sec car in full street trim
runs mid 11s at low boost
car is so well tuned you can drive it everyday
RB26 BOREDTO 2.8L
FULLY BUILT RACING ENGINE
BALANCED AND BLUE PRINTED
JE RACING FORGED PISTONS
ARP ROD BOLTS
NISMO BEARINGS
NISMO OIL PUMP
NISMO WATER PUMP
HKS 280 CAMS IN/OUT
HKS DRAG PRO VALVE SPRINGS
ADJUSTABLE CAM GEARS
PORTED AND POLISHED HEAD
HKS 1.6MM HEAD GASKET
TWIN KKK TOPMOUNT TURBO
BLITZ MANIFOLD
TWIN RACING WASTEGATES
TIAL 55MM RACING BLOW OFF VALVE
MOTEC ENGINE MANAGEMENT
CUSTOM FUEL RAIL
720CC INJECTORS
SARD REGULATOR
TWIN BOSCH MOTORSPORT PUMPS
CUSTOM ALLOY SURGE TANK
CUSTOM ALLOY BREATHER AND WATER TANK
BRAIDED HOSES
TWIN 3" STAINLESS EXHAUST SYSTEM
OS GIKEN TWIN PLATE CLUTCH
BLITZ 120MM INTERCOOLER
HKS RACING OIL COOLER WITH REMOTE FILTER
CUSTOM POLISHED PIPING
TEIN ADJUSTABLE SUSPENSION
EQUIPE 3 PIECE POLISHED DEEP DISHED RACING WHEELS 18X11 ALLROUND
HKS EVC5
TURBO TIMER
NISMO WHITE DASH
RECARO SEAT
AIRCON
CD
ALARM
PERSONAL REASONS FOR SALE
will ship anywhere
$95000AUD
for sale at http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/upload/showthread.php?t=25794&page=1&pp=15
|
PaulW
Member
Registered: 26th Jan 03
Location: Atherton, Greater Manchester
User status: Offline
|
£37070.12 
|
Nismo
Member
Registered: 12th Sep 02
User status: Offline
|
nah me no likes , looks to chavley
|
CraigyG
Member
Registered: 20th Oct 02
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
User status: Offline
|
Thats pure sex! i want but cant afford £37070.12 
|
AK
Member
Registered: 5th Jul 00
Location: Aberdeen City
User status: Offline
|
i like the engine, the wheels and the view front/back....
side on is horrific tho 
|
ed
Member
Registered: 10th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
|
Dom
Member
Registered: 13th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
looks nice from the front and back, but get to the sides and it looks like something out of transformers 
although, im curious to how its 800brake, when it states that its only 520brake running on bog standard fuel. Fair doos that you could wack the boost abit, but if someone brought it over here, then i very much doubt that it would see 800brake 
|
AK
Member
Registered: 5th Jul 00
Location: Aberdeen City
User status: Offline
|
650@ 4wheels@1.7 bar on 103octane
Transmission losses on 4wed?!?!?!?!
800 at the fly
|
Dom
Member
Registered: 13th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Adam Kindness
650@ 4wheels@1.7 bar on 103octane
Transmission losses on 4wed?!?!?!?!
800 at the fly
yea 650 on 103octane fuel, which is racing fuel, no the boggo standard shite you get out ya pump at tescos
eitherway, i cant see it running 600brake on bog standard fuel, even with the boost turned up
but then again, im not really a mega fan of the cars, would rather have a 10 grand westfield that would put bikes to shame 
|
myke
Member
Registered: 7th Feb 01
Location: High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire
User status: Offline
|
ugly as sin, but you've got to love it
|
ed
Member
Registered: 10th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by VisibleMan
quote:
Originally posted by Adam Kindness
650@ 4wheels@1.7 bar on 103octane
Transmission losses on 4wed?!?!?!?!
800 at the fly
yea 650 on 103octane fuel, which is racing fuel, no the boggo standard shite you get out ya pump at tescos
eitherway, i cant see it running 600brake on bog standard fuel, even with the boost turned up
but then again, im not really a mega fan of the cars, would rather have a 10 grand westfield that would put bikes to shame
I'd rather a £15-£46k Tiger that would put nearly ever production car on the market to shame. That includes McLaren F1's and probably Ferrari Enzo's... Sooooo cool!
|
Dom
Member
Registered: 13th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by 1800ed
quote:
Originally posted by VisibleMan
quote:
Originally posted by Adam Kindness
650@ 4wheels@1.7 bar on 103octane
Transmission losses on 4wed?!?!?!?!
800 at the fly
yea 650 on 103octane fuel, which is racing fuel, no the boggo standard shite you get out ya pump at tescos
eitherway, i cant see it running 600brake on bog standard fuel, even with the boost turned up
but then again, im not really a mega fan of the cars, would rather have a 10 grand westfield that would put bikes to shame
I'd rather a £15-£46k Tiger that would put nearly ever production car on the market to shame. That includes McLaren F1's and probably Ferrari Enzo's... Sooooo cool!
ie: the tiger is a good little car, but the gearbox is mashed...especially having two gear levers isnt that something like 3.1 secs to 60 or something stupidily low?
ive seen busa westfields do 60 in about the same as a McLaren F1, which isnt too sloppy but someone was telling me of some guy who had a tuned busa westfield that was hitting under 3s to 60
|
DAYZEE
Member
Registered: 13th Nov 00
Location: Stevenage, MR2 Turbo, 328i Coupe, CBR600F
User status: Offline
|
You'll still lose to a McLaren F1 in the end....
|
Dom
Member
Registered: 13th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by DAYZEE
You'll still lose to a McLaren F1 in the end....
you would be about a cars length in front of the thing and would probably start loosing when you got to the limit of the westfield/tiger (etc), which is about 120-140. But then again, would you want to do 140 in something that is about 50mm of the ground?
|
DAYZEE
Member
Registered: 13th Nov 00
Location: Stevenage, MR2 Turbo, 328i Coupe, CBR600F
User status: Offline
|
A Maclaren F1 goes from 0-100 in 6.3 seconds, if you were ever infront of it, it would not be for long.
|
ed
Member
Registered: 10th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
The Tiger does 0-60 in about 2.9 seconds and 0-100 in around 6. I can't get on the website at the moment to get the figures. BUt it is faster than the McLaren. Remove your penis from Mr McLarens A-Hole now 
[Edited on 10-08-2004 by 1800ed]
|
Dom
Member
Registered: 13th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by 1800ed
The Tiger does 0-60 in about 2.9 seconds and 0-100 in under 6. I can't get on the website at the moment to get the figures. BUt it is faster than the McLaren. Remove your penis from Mr McLarens A-Hole now
[Edited on 10-08-2004 by 1800ed]
shit, the tiger is quicker than i thought to 60
like i said dayzee, the tiger (or other kit car) would only start loosing when it reached its top speed. And alot of the busa engined westfield top speed is about 130-140 
|
DAYZEE
Member
Registered: 13th Nov 00
Location: Stevenage, MR2 Turbo, 328i Coupe, CBR600F
User status: Offline
|
0-60 mph : 3.2 sec
0-100 mph : 6.3 sec
0-150 mph : 12.8 sec
0-200 mph : 28.0 sec
Those figures humble any car. When a Tiger passes the McLaren at 231mph I conceed its a faster car, until then, its not.
|
Dom
Member
Registered: 13th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by DAYZEE
0-60 mph : 3.2 sec
0-100 mph : 6.3 sec
0-150 mph : 12.8 sec
0-200 mph : 28.0 sec
Those figures humble any car. When a Tiger passes the McLaren at 231mph I conceed its a faster car, until then, its not.
dude!!! go over to tigerracecars.com (i think thats the addy) and have a butchers, you will see that the tiger will out run the McLaren to around the 130 mark, after that yea the McLaren F1 will out run the thing, but only because of top speed. Even then, the reyland cossie would out run a McLaren to 60, since the escort does 60 in 2.8secs
And the McLaren is already dead in the water, with the koenigsegg as that out runs the thing in every department, especially the CCR, which i believe has a top speed of around 250-260, something stupid like that
oh and the F1 does 60 in 3.34 seconds and has a top speed of 243mph i remember tif needell doing the top speed run around a bowl circuit in the UK somewhere.
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
when did a mc f1 ever do 243 mph, are you 100% sure
|
Matt H
Member
Registered: 11th Sep 01
Location: South Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
not keen on looks but i love it
|
ed
Member
Registered: 10th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by VisibleMan
quote:
Originally posted by DAYZEE
0-60 mph : 3.2 sec
0-100 mph : 6.3 sec
0-150 mph : 12.8 sec
0-200 mph : 28.0 sec
Those figures humble any car. When a Tiger passes the McLaren at 231mph I conceed its a faster car, until then, its not.
dude!!! go over to tigerracecars.com (i think thats the addy) and have a butchers, you will see that the tiger will out run the McLaren to around the 130 mark, after that yea the McLaren F1 will out run the thing, but only because of top speed. Even then, the reyland cossie would out run a McLaren to 60, since the escort does 60 in 2.8secs
And the McLaren is already dead in the water, with the koenigsegg as that out runs the thing in every department, especially the CCR, which i believe has a top speed of around 250-260, something stupid like that
oh and the F1 does 60 in 3.34 seconds and has a top speed of 243mph i remember tif needell doing the top speed run around a bowl circuit in the UK somewhere.
The Tiger Racing site doesn't have the most up to date figures on it. The Z-Cars site is the one you want, but I can't get on at the moment
|
DAYZEE
Member
Registered: 13th Nov 00
Location: Stevenage, MR2 Turbo, 328i Coupe, CBR600F
User status: Offline
|
That top speed was attained with the rev limiter removed, therefore its not the standard car. It was actually 241.14mph, the UK top speed was 195.3mph.
The figures above are autocar test figures when the car was released.
And a car that is 100mph slower than another car cannot be called faster can it? Maybe faster accelerating between 0 and 100 but not overall.
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by DAYZEE
That top speed was attained with the rev limiter removed, therefore its not the standard car. It was actually 241.14mph, the UK top speed was 195.3mph.
The figures above are autocar test figures when the car was released.
And a car that is 100mph slower than another car cannot be called faster can it? Maybe faster accelerating between 0 and 100 but not overall.
there closer to what i thought
|
Dom
Member
Registered: 13th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by jr
when did a mc f1 ever do 243 mph, are you 100% sure
yes, it was done by needell and its also in my bros McLaren F1 book
thing is, people only seem to remember the first run which McLaren did, well first series of runs, and they got the car to 240.1mph, but tiff squeezed the extra 2.9mph outta the thing
however, the difference between these two are only small, so ive always believed it was down to weather conditions on both days. Needell started off in the dry, but when he recorded the final run it was in the wet and i believe he had the wind too 
only thing that the McLaren has up its sleeves, is the fact that McLaren could tune the car to produce 1000 odd brake, because BMW (i think it was them, well some other car manufacture) was designing a similar car, and McLaren wanted the upper hand just incase anything came from it. But since nothing did, they left it at 680brake. Shame that they never had to do the adjustments, then it would have seriously kicked some butt and probably would be kicking butt
|
