corsasport.co.uk
  Not logged in [Login - Register]  
You Are Not Registered Or Not Logged In  

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » Scooby 0-60?


New Topic
New Poll 		  <<  1    2  >> Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.


Author Scooby 0-60?
L33 LEG
Banned
Registered: 6th Jan 03
Location: Blackburn . Drove: Dimma Saxo VTR
User status: Offline
20th Apr 04 at 11:57   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
does anyone know how fast those Scooby Sport 2.0 are, the non-turbo ones.

cheers
Matt H
Member
Registered: 11th Sep 01
Location: South Yorkshire
User status: Offline
20th Apr 04 at 11:57   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
same as an sxi probably
Tom
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: Wirral, Merseyside
User status: Offline
20th Apr 04 at 11:59   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Lame apparantly i think it's like 10.5
L33 LEG
Banned
Registered: 6th Jan 03
Location: Blackburn . Drove: Dimma Saxo VTR
User status: Offline
20th Apr 04 at 12:00   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
10.5 i thote theyd be slow, but not that slow!?
Corsa E-Tec
Member
Registered: 4th Feb 04
Location: Stevenage Drives: Leon Cupra
User status: Offline
20th Apr 04 at 12:02   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
10.5? book time for a corsa 1.6 is about 9.0-9.5.
stuyw
Member
Registered: 15th May 02
Location: North West Drives: Rev3 MR2 Turbo
User status: Offline
20th Apr 04 at 12:08   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
thinkl they've got about 125bhp?
L33 LEG
Banned
Registered: 6th Jan 03
Location: Blackburn . Drove: Dimma Saxo VTR
User status: Offline
20th Apr 04 at 12:13   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
how crap is that
J da Silva
Member
Registered: 10th Apr 03
Location: The FACTory
User status: Offline
20th Apr 04 at 14:32   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
135bhp i think, not classed as performance cars
corsa5dr
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 03
Location: Bath/Bristol - Evo 4 GSR
User status: Offline
20th Apr 04 at 20:48   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
thats rubbish
Jambo
Member
Registered: 8th Sep 01
Location: Maidenhead, Drives: VXR Arctic
User status: Offline
20th Apr 04 at 20:54   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Not all cars are built for performance peeps
nickyboy01
Member
Registered: 10th Sep 03
Location: Oxford-ish
User status: Offline
20th Apr 04 at 22:28   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
My brother was looking at buying one.

Specs are as follows:

Kerb weight 1130kg
114bhp@5600rpm
172lb/ft@4000rpm
Max speed 118mph
0-62 10.2 secs
Front ventilated discs
Rear drum brakes

Max 30.1 mpg

Pretty poor all round IMHO
Adam_B
Member
Registered: 13th Dec 00
Location: Lancashire
User status: Offline
20th Apr 04 at 22:30   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
torque is intresting, are they 4wd still?
nickyboy01
Member
Registered: 10th Sep 03
Location: Oxford-ish
User status: Offline
20th Apr 04 at 22:36   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Yeah, full time 4wd which is why the fuel economy is quite poor for a n/a 2.0l. Constant 4wd drags somewhat. They are torquey engines but are completely different to the one fitted to the Turbo.

The Turbo is 290lb/ft which if you compare to sa a Cav turbo which runs similar power (204bhp) is almost 100lb/ft more than the cav

[Edited on 20-04-2004 by nickyboy01]
Adam_B
Member
Registered: 13th Dec 00
Location: Lancashire
User status: Offline
20th Apr 04 at 22:49   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
its not the same flat four then?
R Lee
Member
Registered: 15th Aug 03
User status: Offline
20th Apr 04 at 23:01   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
they suck ass! even i can keep up with a sport! (im lying)
nickyboy01
Member
Registered: 10th Sep 03
Location: Oxford-ish
User status: Offline
20th Apr 04 at 23:02   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Not sure if its the same layout but apparently it is different to the Trubo lump
luca2020
Member
Registered: 26th May 02
Location: Maidstone, Kent
User status: Offline
20th Apr 04 at 23:37   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by nickyboy01
Yeah, full time 4wd which is why the fuel economy is quite poor for a n/a 2.0l. Constant 4wd drags somewhat. They are torquey engines but are completely different to the one fitted to the Turbo.

The Turbo is 290lb/ft which if you compare to sa a Cav turbo which runs similar power (204bhp) is almost 100lb/ft more than the cav

[Edited on 20-04-2004 by nickyboy01]


u r joking arent u? the uk2000 turbo model does not have 290 tourqe!

and where did u get that figure for the tourqe on the n/a 2.0?

and yes as people have said they are so lame, just no point in buying 1
Ditch
Member
Registered: 29th Nov 02
Location: St Albans Drives: JDM Celica GT4 WRC
User status: Offline
21st Apr 04 at 09:43   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by nickyboy01
My brother was looking at buying one.

Specs are as follows:

114bhp@5600rpm
172lb/ft@4000rpm


always thought the 2.0ltr sport model was 123bhp
Demo
Member
Registered: 27th Sep 01
Location: south wales Drives: astra sri ecoflex
User status: Offline
21st Apr 04 at 09:50   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
ha ha. they are total pish
L33 LEG
Banned
Registered: 6th Jan 03
Location: Blackburn . Drove: Dimma Saxo VTR
User status: Offline
21st Apr 04 at 09:54   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
by the way, the information needed was not for me, was for a mate
Ditch
Member
Registered: 29th Nov 02
Location: St Albans Drives: JDM Celica GT4 WRC
User status: Offline
21st Apr 04 at 09:54   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by nickyboy01
They are torquey engines but are completely different to the one fitted to the Turbo.

The Turbo is 290lb/ft which if you compare to sa a Cav turbo which runs similar power (204bhp) is almost 100lb/ft more than the cav


Utter shite, they are exactly the same block, the EJ20 being the normally aspirated and the EJ20T being the turbocharged model.

The differences are a turbo, intercooler, copression ratios and extra camshafts, but essentially its the same engine.
J da Silva
Member
Registered: 10th Apr 03
Location: The FACTory
User status: Offline
21st Apr 04 at 09:59   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
these are not performance classed cars, are people getting this yet?

ditch is right i asked a scoobynet member after i read this yesterday and sent him the link to this thread, he said nickyboy is a verbal shittest
Tom
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: Wirral, Merseyside
User status: Offline
21st Apr 04 at 10:02   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
So it'd still 'rumble' but just wouldn't go anywhere
L33 LEG
Banned
Registered: 6th Jan 03
Location: Blackburn . Drove: Dimma Saxo VTR
User status: Offline
21st Apr 04 at 10:02   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
i know what u sayin VT, but my mate is after a very fast car basically, so for him it is utter shite performance.
Ditch
Member
Registered: 29th Nov 02
Location: St Albans Drives: JDM Celica GT4 WRC
User status: Offline
21st Apr 04 at 10:02   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
yes the sport is just a quality saloon, never intended for performance

  <<  1    2  >>
New Topic
New Poll

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » Scooby 0-60? 23 database queries in 0.0214312 seconds