corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » What would use most...


New Topic

New Poll
  Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.


Author What would use most...
Ry_B
Banned

Registered: 1st Dec 05
Location: Solihull, W Mids Drives: 45BHP beast!
User status: Offline
1st May 06 at 18:06   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Petrol?

Staying at a certain amount of revs...say 5k RPM or accelerating to 5k revs, back down to tickover straight back up to 5k RPM?

[Edited on 01-05-2006 by Rcb]
Paul_J
Member

Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
1st May 06 at 18:07   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

accelerating I would say in a way.

basically how much your foot down is how much your throttle is open / fuel being chucked in - obviously if your driving at 5k constantly it'll be using more fuel than driving at 2k constantly.

but if your putting foot to floor accelerating to 5k, slowing down, putting foot to floor back up to 5k etc constantly i'd say it'd use more.
Robin
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 7th Jan 04
Location: Northants Drives: Clio 182 Cup
User status: Offline
1st May 06 at 18:07   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

the latter

constant revs is more economical
SVM 286
Member

Registered: 13th Feb 05
Location: pain
User status: Offline
1st May 06 at 18:09   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Rcb
Petrol?

Staying at a certain amount of revs...say 5k RPM or accelerating to 5k revs, back down to tickover straight back up to 5k RPM?




The latter.

Why do you ask Rcb?

 
New Topic

New Poll

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » What would use most... 24 database queries in 0.0113139 seconds