SVM 286
Member
Registered: 13th Feb 05
Location: pain
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Deano_sxi
i go off weight anythin over 11 stone n they get left behind
What if she was 6 ft?
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by SVM 286
quote:
Originally posted by Deano_sxi
i go off weight anythin over 11 stone n they get left behind
What if she was 6 ft?
he wouldnt date her though, hes like a Richard "Hamster" Hammond
|
SVM 286
Member
Registered: 13th Feb 05
Location: pain
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Cybermonkey
quote:
Originally posted by SVM 286
quote:
Originally posted by Deano_sxi
i go off weight anythin over 11 stone n they get left behind
What if she was 6 ft?
he wouldnt date her though, hes like a Richard "Hamster" Hammond
Never stopped Dudley Moore
|
Tiger_kpt
Member
Registered: 2nd Apr 05
Location: Retford, Nottinghamshire
User status: Offline
|
Anything upto a size 14 is fine by me. Above 14 and it's a no-no. But really it shouldn't go by size. That's a farce. Really all down to body height, structure, weight, shape and how they carry the weight and themselves. There is definitely a thing as being too skinny though. Nothing worse than either really overweight or really underweight. The whole "stick-insect" model type or the overweight "cattle" build type just doesn't do it for me. I'd say between 10 and 14, but all down to the body itself. Not the size of clothes it can fit into.
Bit of a shoot assumption to say that body depends upon dress, top or bottoms size.
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Tiger_kpt
Anything upto a size 14 is fine by me. Above 14 and it's a no-no. But really it shouldn't go by size. That's a farce. Really all down to body height, structure, weight, shape and how they carry the weight and themselves. There is definitely a thing as being too skinny though. Nothing worse than either really overweight or really underweight. The whole "stick-insect" model type or the overweight "cattle" build type just doesn't do it for me. I'd say between 10 and 14, but all down to the body itself. Not the size of clothes it can fit into.
Bit of a shoot assumption to say that body depends upon dress, top or bottoms size.
absolutely no twigs or big units
|
Thoday
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 03
Location: Drove kitted corsa b now standard corcs c exclusiv
User status: Offline
|
shallow cfunts everyone should have voted 16+ as fat
12 and 14 is average and usually not fat
|
Adge
Member
Registered: 28th Aug 04
Location: Lancashire
User status: Offline
|
anything 12+, a size 12 is the maximum i wud go with!
|
Thoday
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 03
Location: Drove kitted corsa b now standard corcs c exclusiv
User status: Offline
|
the sad fact for you lot is you have all probably have been or will go with a size 14+
|
Tiger_kpt
Member
Registered: 2nd Apr 05
Location: Retford, Nottinghamshire
User status: Offline
|
I think the thing we have to ask here though..... REALLY is how big are you guys in terms of BUILD???
I voted 16+ as fat. Wouldn't go there. I personally think that size 8 is way too small. Too "stick" like. A woman is all about CURVES. (In the RIGHT places mind).
I think 10-12-14 is spot on, however each individual lass is different. All down to shape, build, height, structure, weight, body mass location, etc.
I'm willing to BET that all of you guys who said that sizes 10, 12 or 14 are basically just short, skinny, with "nothing to them" kind of build..... that would only feel intimidated by a real woman, hence needing a small, "child-like" build of a lass.
And just for the record, before you all start. I'm 6ft2-3in, 46in chest, 36in waist, 34in inside leg. Very well built. Rugby player-esque type build.
No offence intended, but that's the way it's coming accross. Think we should have a posted thread to see what sort of build, height, weight all the ladies would go for and see how you all compare to that.
|
ssj_kakarot
Member
Registered: 29th Apr 03
Location: hartlepool
User status: Offline
|
lol thats rather generilisez im not skinny in the least, very well built gym type person.
lol i just like slim cute girls who are size 8, also i work on my body a lot so i dont see why a woman cant work on hers n not eat shite all the time get overweight and winge about being overweight.
nout to do with being intimidated with a real woman i just find slim girls atttractive, and like the fact they take some pride in them selves, and dont get depressed becasue they made them selves fat by eating shoot.
|
ssj_kakarot
Member
Registered: 29th Apr 03
Location: hartlepool
User status: Offline
|
ow by the way my girlfriend does have curves in all the right places, just cos some one is size 8 doesnt meen there skinny as out.
you a chubby chaser lol ?
|
Tiger_kpt
Member
Registered: 2nd Apr 05
Location: Retford, Nottinghamshire
User status: Offline
|
You actually read? Lame 
|
gianluigi
Member
Registered: 9th Mar 05
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by ssj_kakarot
you a chubby chaser lol ?
|
Tiger_kpt
Member
Registered: 2nd Apr 05
Location: Retford, Nottinghamshire
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by ssj_kakarot
you a chubby chaser lol ?
I think it's great how people have guts and balls when stuck behind a screen and a keyboard. But I would LOVE for you to TRY to say that to my face.
And in what way is a 10, 12 or 14 chubby? Damn Nob-Jockey.
|
Brett
Premium Member
Registered: 16th Dec 02
Location: Manchester
User status: Offline
|
Size 8 is pretty rank. You may aswell be with an 8 year old for what it's worth 
Agree with what Ally and Tiger are saying.
|
Tom
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: Wirral, Merseyside
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by K17STY
size 12 is the start of fat, even some 10's are fat
Fat.....yuck. There is no need stop eating or something it mings.
Its even worse now cause all the kids are getting fatter. Its now the skionny ones who are the minority. NO NEED
lol you aren't blunt are u
|
Tiger_kpt
Member
Registered: 2nd Apr 05
Location: Retford, Nottinghamshire
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by loafofbrett
Size 8 is pretty rank. You may aswell be with an 8 year old for what it's worth
Agree with what Ally and Tiger are saying.
So True!!! Sense!
ssj_kakarot...... your bird 8-years old?
[Edited on 13-02-2006 by Tiger_kpt]
|
gianluigi
Member
Registered: 9th Mar 05
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk
User status: Offline
|
its so not about the appearence. appearence helps matters when it comes to meetin a girl, but i feel as long as they can make me laugh and i feel comfortable and can have a good time around them, i couldnt care if they are a size 16
(size 18 is out of the question  )
|
mattwhite
Member
Registered: 22nd Jun 03
Location: Northamptonshire
User status: Offline
|
when i first got with my girlfriend she was a 10 but now with going on the pill and growing up and all that she's gone to a size 12 which she's not happy with there for she's going to loose weight, i would rather have a girl with a toned body than a girl with a stick thin body. But i think overweight is 16+ which would be a no go area.
Anyway some places my girlfriend goes to and has a size 10 and some a 12 so nobody has an exact size because they vary from place to place.
my personal preference is a size 8 up to 12. But if my girlfriend went up to a 14 i wouldn't leave her just for that fact! i would try and help her to loose it a help her tone up.
|
Brett
Premium Member
Registered: 16th Dec 02
Location: Manchester
User status: Offline
|
Well, i'm a breasts man. All my girlfriends have had 34D+ breasts, and there's no way a pair of 34D's are gonna fit into a size 8 top. Fuck peanut tits!
|
dave17
Member
Registered: 3rd Sep 02
Location: Greater London
User status: Offline
|
Yes 34D+ breasts = large belly = no thanks
|
Tiger_kpt
Member
Registered: 2nd Apr 05
Location: Retford, Nottinghamshire
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by loafofbrett
Well, i'm a breasts man. All my girlfriends have had 34D+ breasts, and there's no way a pair of 34D's are gonna fit into a size 8 top. Fuck peanut tits!
Yet again man. Well said. My bird at the minute is a size 12 with 34D tats. Oh and a nice curvy yet firm ass. More of an ass man myself. But 34D is just a great bonus.
|
Tiger_kpt
Member
Registered: 2nd Apr 05
Location: Retford, Nottinghamshire
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by dave17
Yes 34D+ breasts = large belly = no thanks
Does it F*CK! Although yeah there are exceptions (as always). And birds don't take care of themselves generally as much as they should these days, but don't know how you can generalize to that assumption unless you shop for birds in a field or farm.
[Edited on 13-02-2006 by Tiger_kpt]
|
Brett
Premium Member
Registered: 16th Dec 02
Location: Manchester
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Tiger_kpt
quote:
Originally posted by dave17
Yes 34D+ breasts = large belly = no thanks
Does it F*CK! Although yeah there are exceptions (as always). And birds don't take care of themselves generally as much as they should these days, but don't know how you can generalize to that assumption unless you shop for birds in a field or farm.
[Edited on 13-02-2006 by Tiger_kpt]
agreed, big tits doesn't equal big belly, you're wrong there, sorry
|
ssj_kakarot
Member
Registered: 29th Apr 03
Location: hartlepool
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Does it F*CK! Altough yeah there are exceptions (as always). Don't know how you can generalize to that assumption unless you shop for birds in a field or farm.
im sorry didnt you just generilize my girlfriend to say she must be a child if she is a size 8. so it seems pretty easy to generalize.
|
