16V_1600
Member
Registered: 7th Oct 07
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by BAZ 1256
quote:
Originally posted by 16V_1600CS
quote:
Originally posted by Vaux Lad
quote:
Originally posted by 16V_1600CS
quote:
Originally posted by Dave A
for anyone that read it, very interesting to see that the n/a 2.0 engines were just as fast/faster than the Let's and V6 ones. granted they had a proper gearbox but goes to show that fast doesnt necessarily mean having a turbo or big engine.
Just got total Vaux today. There is a C20XE nova with a whole sec quicker to 60 than a LET nova.
**considers XE over LET to go in my sport**
That's a tb'd/nitrous'd XE that has more power than a let  lol
Plus its a car built for pretty much 1/4s
[Edited on 30-12-2007 by Vaux Lad]
I don't know what to save for then, If I get to half way and get the car XE'd then regret it and wish I'd gone for the LET. It's doing my head in 
if its road car and your just wnating an engine swap then LET it!!
youll spend a shit load more on an XE to make it faster.
iv spent thousands on my XE and its fast but i would never use it for a road car
Yeah it's a road car, not going to be stripped or anything. Comfort and power 
|
