Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
The perfect example
N/A AC Cobra. 5 litre V8.
Makes peak power of 225 bhp @ 4200 but has 300 lb ft of torque @ 3000 rpm
NO FI.
http://www.pistonheads.com/fastcars/ac/cobra.asp
Merely only because it makes peak power so low (torque drops off quickly after its peaks / also peak torque is low).
|
Jules S
Premium Member
Registered: 24th Dec 03
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Paul_J
The perfect example
N/A AC Cobra. 5 litre V8.
Makes peak power of 225 bhp @ 4200 but has 300 lb ft of torque @ 3000 rpm
NO FI.
http://www.pistonheads.com/fastcars/ac/cobra.asp
Merely only because it makes peak power so low (torque drops off quickly after its peaks / also peak torque is low).
fair comment.
But a 5 litre car putting out peak torque at 3k rpm?
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
yes - because its a single overhead cam (on each side) lazy v8. Which just has shed loads of torque, but doesn't rev that high.
[Edited on 14-05-2006 by Paul_J]
|
SVM 286
Member
Registered: 13th Feb 05
Location: pain
User status: Offline
|
Both my ZT and the Turbo make more torque than power and one is a V8, and the other is a force induced 4 cylinder.
Judging by how it drives i'd say my 6 pot Mercedes makes more torque than power also.
[Edited on 14-05-2006 by SVM 286]
|
davey_jack
Member
Registered: 28th Jan 06
Location: Horley, Surrey Drives: Clio 182
User status: Offline
|
well torque and power cant really be compared as they are measured in different units, however it is fair to make the comparison that a 16v engine will produce more power than an otherwise identical 8v engine, and the 8v engine will produce more torque.
|
davey_jack
Member
Registered: 28th Jan 06
Location: Horley, Surrey Drives: Clio 182
User status: Offline
|
sorry made a mistake here... the 8v engine will not produce more torque but it will produce its peak torque at a lower rpm
|
SVM 286
Member
Registered: 13th Feb 05
Location: pain
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Jules S
A/. It's always been my understanding that its impossible to get higher lb/ft torque than BHP without forced induction? yes or no?
No Jules, my ZT is standard and normally aspirated and produces approx 260 bhp, yet it makes just over 300 lb ft.
The same will apply when it is supercharged, the torque will still exceed the horsepower.
|
Jules S
Premium Member
Registered: 24th Dec 03
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Paul_J
I think the problem is, everyone's got obsessed with top gear etc, talking about torque and bhp like they're completely different things - totally unrelated.
Torque is the turning power, but to get a high power figure you need that torque to extend for as far as you can on the revs (or keep increasing ideally)
"A computerized engine dynamometer accurately measures torque and rpm and then can accurately calculate horsepower."
A rolling road isn't measuring power, it's measuring the torque (turning force) of the wheels - and the rpm at which this is . then using the formula I've already spoken about calculate the power.
Thus as I've said it before, if you have a car that makes all its power low down in the revs (like a Turbo Diesel) you get a larger torque figure than a peak power figure.
The reason it has so much torque is due to the turbo, the reason it makes the torque so low down is due to being a diesel.
This is a stupid and pointless post / question.
I just noticed this, since the thread was bumped.
To be honest, using equations to work out flywheel bhp is pointless....too many variables to take into account.
My tuning so far acheives peak torque (and a pretty much flat torque to the limiter) at the revvs the engine falls to when changing up at the limiter.
I dont have the graphs yet, may get them done on monday when its serviced
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
Torque is the only thing really being measured.
BHP is merely a calculation of the torque based on what rpm it is at and divided by 5252. This is all BHP is.
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
http://www.pumaracing.co.uk/power1.htm
This explains what torque + power is, and how they are calculated. read it, it makes a lot of sense.
|
Ry_B
Banned
Registered: 1st Dec 05
Location: Solihull, W Mids Drives: 45BHP beast!
User status: Offline
|
Welcome back to the top
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
quote: Power and torque are just twin aspects of the same maths that determines how an engine performs and anyone wanting to tune an engine ought to benefit from a better understanding of the what the figures mean.
Horsepower = Torque x rpm / 5252.
This is the universal equation that links torque and horsepower. It doesn't matter whether we are talking about petrol engines, diesel engines or steam engines. If we know the rpm and the torque we can calculate horsepower. If we know horsepower and rpm we can calculate torque by rearranging the equation above:
Torque = Horsepower x 5252 / rpm
Most people have at least a vague idea what horsepower is but very little understanding of torque.
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
Effectively based on that logic and answer to your original question jules S
Any car that makes peak power BELOW 5252 will have less peak power than peak torque
Anything that makes Peak Power above 5252 should have more peak power than peak torque.
Just due to how each are worked out.
|
Robin
Premium Member
Registered: 7th Jan 04
Location: Northants Drives: Clio 182 Cup
User status: Offline
|
thread can go now then
|
Jules S
Premium Member
Registered: 24th Dec 03
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Paul_J
http://www.pumaracing.co.uk/power1.htm
This explains what torque + power is, and how they are calculated. read it, it makes a lot of sense.
Too true Paul,
Read that before......Not disputing that paper.
However it only relates to bench tested engines, not ones measured on a RR.
Since the torque/bhp is measured at the wheels, other factors have to be taken into account.
Since i read yours, try reading mine. IMO (and I know the bloke well, does the tuning on my vx) it's probably the most honest assessment ive seen...
Always good debate with you dude

>clicky<
|
Ry_B
Banned
Registered: 1st Dec 05
Location: Solihull, W Mids Drives: 45BHP beast!
User status: Offline
|
End of the discussion now then
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
ah touche
Fair play jules, yeh I agree it's not gonna give an accurate fly figure - as it's measured at the wheels at the end of the day.
Only true fly figure is to take the engine out and dyno it at the fly.
That wasn't really what I was debating - but fair play.
|
DarkBahamut
Member
Registered: 4th Jun 06
Location: Cambridge, Cambridgeshire
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Paul_J
Effectively based on that logic and answer to your original question jules S
Any car that makes peak power BELOW 5252 will have less peak power than peak torque
Anything that makes Peak Power above 5252 should have more peak power than peak torque.
Just due to how each are worked out.
Thats what i thought too, but the haynes manual for the corsa says otherwise. That said, im 99% sure the haynes manual has the wrong engine specs listed for the C14NZ, so...
|
Jules S
Premium Member
Registered: 24th Dec 03
User status: Offline
|

Hence John Thornes comments on the link I posted.
I totally respect him for saying that. He's sort of shot himself in the foot by alienating himself from others who 'claim' massive headline bhp figures, when at the end of the day its not all about that.
Thats why he's only quoting stuff at the wheels now, and has endeavoured to get the figures as accurate a possible using a strict regime about tying down/cooling etc.
Ive spunked about 2k on my engine at the mo.....little headline bhp increase (yet to be measured on mine) but its a far better engine....highest torque in the right areas of the range
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
Yeh which is where you want it 
Pff who wants shed loads of torque at 3k rpm and then it all disapears (ala most diesel turbos today).
The problem is, most of joe public has always fantastised about Peak BHP.
Now with more people talking about Torque, a lot of people fantastise about big peak Torque figures.
But at the end of the day, they're effectively talking about the same thing - what they should be looking at is how the torque is delivered and how useable it is.
|
Jules S
Premium Member
Registered: 24th Dec 03
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Paul_J
Yeh which is where you want it 
Pff who wants shed loads of torque at 3k rpm and then it all disapears (ala most diesel turbos today).
The problem is, most of joe public has always fantastised about Peak BHP.
Now with more people talking about Torque, a lot of people fantastise about big peak Torque figures.
But at the end of the day, they're effectively talking about the same thing - what they should be looking at is how the torque is delivered and how useable it is.
Yup,
A typical example is a vtec engine....lots of power and torque when in the 'zone'
Pretty poo in both respects and unusable when not in the 'zone'
Hence a close ratio 6 gear box to keep you in the powerband
|
timrud_
Member
Registered: 3rd Jul 04
Location: Sheffield
User status: Offline
|
I agree.
|
Andyrs1800
Member
Registered: 15th Oct 03
User status: Offline
|
My fiesta 1.8 Zetec had 116bhp and 123lbft so for a 116bhp car it was fair quick, it did feel like it had a lot more power, my mate had a standard rs1800 (130bhp 120lbft) and my car was spot on with his performance wise,
Now back do my cvic rant (i do like civic's by the way) the new shape type-r's have like 197bhp but are down on torque so dont feel like 200bhp thats why at the PV show they were doing 15.4ish all day where a standard red top corsa could do it a bit quicker with 50bhp less,
at the end of the day, if you have looads of torque your car wont be affected as badly by weight, ie, if you have loadsa torque you wont notice your car go slower when your fat mate gets in,
What was the question again?
|