corsa5dr
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 03
Location: Bath/Bristol - Evo 4 GSR
User status: Offline
|
BHP per tonne makes those figures closer though.
VTS 0-60 mid 7's
2.0 0-60 low 7's.
probably only a second or 2 in it to 100.
|
corsa5dr
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 03
Location: Bath/Bristol - Evo 4 GSR
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Twiggy
My 2.0 was doing the 0 - 60 in 6.7
My VTS is doing 0 - 60 8.0ish
Your VTS is broke then
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by corsa5dr
BHP per tonne makes those figures closer though.
VTS 0-60 mid 7's
2.0 0-60 low 7's.
probably only a second or 2 in it to 100.
BHP per tonne should be greater in a 2.0 Corsa.
|
corsa5dr
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 03
Location: Bath/Bristol - Evo 4 GSR
User status: Offline
|
Yeh probably. But my point is that to compare those two is fairer than comparing a VTS to a GSI. As the difference in BHP per tonne will be greater between the GSI and VTS than in the case of the 2.0 and VTS
|
Martin_C
Member
Registered: 27th Jun 03
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
User status: Offline
|
skoda rapid is faster than the similar spec lada riva.
|
corsa5dr
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 03
Location: Bath/Bristol - Evo 4 GSR
User status: Offline
|
|
Meat-Pie-SRI
Member
Registered: 10th Apr 02
Location: Berkhamsted, Drives Mk4 R32
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by corsa5dr
Gsi vs 90 bhp VTR = GSI by a fair way
Gsi vs 100bhp VTR= GSI by a bit
Very accurate and scientriffic!!
|
corsa5dr
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 03
Location: Bath/Bristol - Evo 4 GSR
User status: Offline
|
You get the idea
|