Jodi_the_g
Member
Registered: 7th Aug 01
Location: Washington D.C
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ojc
But then again you do NEED major disasters now and again to keep the population of the planet down.
Could not agree more with this. or a couple of wars, to many people to support the food chain in some countrys
I aslo disagree with goverments giving them money as its from tax payers in there own country if we are perfect in the UK then fine but we not. So why give them money would they do the same no.
|
SetH
Member
Registered: 15th Jul 01
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ojc
quote:
Originally posted by Cybermonkey24
Another thing with the earthquake, the USGS monitored the actual event and knew it was a big earthquake
You said it yourself, America knew therefore if they knew it was a big earthquake why did they not warn them.
It takes 2 seconds to dial a number, even if people could have got upstairs in there buildings it would have saved lives.
what was the time scale from the quake to the first tsunami reaching shore?
|
Ojc
Member
Registered: 14th Nov 00
Location: Reading: Drives : Clio 197
User status: Offline
|
I need more time to think about this, I also need to go on some more inteligent forums to read what they think.
I will revive this thread when I have more information as at present we are clutching at straws.
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by SetH
quote:
Originally posted by Cybermonkey24
quote:
Originally posted by SetH
How difficult would it be to artifically create or to word it better, 'induce' this quake?
The largest thermonuclears of the cold war could not have even grazed the plates enough to make the move
well i dont know enough about geology to know this, but if you are clearly stating that they could not have grazed the plates enough then i guess you must. Please could you elaborate on this? and possibly cite some evidence/research studies.
The sheer physics involved in "artificially" moving tectonic plates is enough evidence. You are talking trillions of tons of mass. Nothing on this earth could move such a massive part of the earth.
|
SetH
Member
Registered: 15th Jul 01
User status: Offline
|
ROFL @ some more intelligent forums 
Perhaps forums where people back up their statements with evidence. 
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by SetH
quote:
Originally posted by Ojc
quote:
Originally posted by Cybermonkey24
Another thing with the earthquake, the USGS monitored the actual event and knew it was a big earthquake
You said it yourself, America knew therefore if they knew it was a big earthquake why did they not warn them.
It takes 2 seconds to dial a number, even if people could have got upstairs in there buildings it would have saved lives.
what was the time scale from the quake to the first tsunami reaching shore?
about 45 minutes to indonesia, and nearly 4 hours to cross the indian ocean.
|
3CorsaMeal
Member
Registered: 11th Apr 02
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ojc
we are clutching at straws.
mines a bendy one and its a real fcuker, i keep letting go 
|
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Cybermonkey24
quote:
Originally posted by SetH
quote:
Originally posted by Cybermonkey24
quote:
Originally posted by SetH
How difficult would it be to artifically create or to word it better, 'induce' this quake?
The largest thermonuclears of the cold war could not have even grazed the plates enough to make the move
well i dont know enough about geology to know this, but if you are clearly stating that they could not have grazed the plates enough then i guess you must. Please could you elaborate on this? and possibly cite some evidence/research studies.
The sheer physics involved in "artificially" moving tectonic plates is enough evidence. You are talking trillions of tons of mass. Nothing on this earth could move such a massive part of the earth.
Except the earth itself
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Jodi_the_g
quote:
Originally posted by Ojc
But then again you do NEED major disasters now and again to keep the population of the planet down.
Could not agree more with this. or a couple of wars, to many people to support the food chain in some countrys
I aslo disagree with goverments giving them money as its from tax payers in there own country if we are perfect in the UK then fine but we not. So why give them money would they do the same no.
You arrogant fuckwit, i hope you fall down a large hole.
|
Ian
Site Administrator
Registered: 28th Aug 99
Location: Liverpool
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by SetH
i expect we will get roasted for thinking like this though.
Not at all, considering all the facts is a sensible thing to do. However, I do feel Oly has not thought this one through though. For one this quake was a natural phenomenon and secondly what is the warning system going to do? Text everyone?
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Robbo
quote:
Originally posted by Cybermonkey24
quote:
Originally posted by SetH
quote:
Originally posted by Cybermonkey24
quote:
Originally posted by SetH
How difficult would it be to artifically create or to word it better, 'induce' this quake?
The largest thermonuclears of the cold war could not have even grazed the plates enough to make the move
well i dont know enough about geology to know this, but if you are clearly stating that they could not have grazed the plates enough then i guess you must. Please could you elaborate on this? and possibly cite some evidence/research studies.
The sheer physics involved in "artificially" moving tectonic plates is enough evidence. You are talking trillions of tons of mass. Nothing on this earth could move such a massive part of the earth.
Except the earth itself
Indeed
|
3CorsaMeal
Member
Registered: 11th Apr 02
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by SetH
ROFL @ some more intelligent forums
Perhaps forums where people back up their statements with evidence.
i worked it all out, saddam hid his weapons at bottom of the sea, and a baby seal swam into a rocket and started off a massive explosion, forcing water up and outwards.
i agree with Bono
|
SetH
Member
Registered: 15th Jul 01
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Cybermonkey24
quote:
Originally posted by SetH
quote:
Originally posted by Cybermonkey24
quote:
Originally posted by SetH
How difficult would it be to artifically create or to word it better, 'induce' this quake?
The largest thermonuclears of the cold war could not have even grazed the plates enough to make the move
well i dont know enough about geology to know this, but if you are clearly stating that they could not have grazed the plates enough then i guess you must. Please could you elaborate on this? and possibly cite some evidence/research studies.
The sheer physics involved in "artificially" moving tectonic plates is enough evidence. You are talking trillions of tons of mass. Nothing on this earth could move such a massive part of the earth.
Ok, i understand what you are saying. But could a series of nuclear blasts instigate a geological event that then became responsible for moving the plates?
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ian
quote:
Originally posted by SetH
i expect we will get roasted for thinking like this though.
Not at all, considering all the facts is a sensible thing to do. However, I do feel Oly has not thought this one through though. For one this quake was a natural phenomenon and secondly what is the warning system going to do? Text everyone?
If an employer can sack 300 people by text, surely the mole people can text a few prime ministers/leaders/old gits in suits?
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by SetH
quote:
Originally posted by Cybermonkey24
quote:
Originally posted by SetH
quote:
Originally posted by Cybermonkey24
quote:
Originally posted by SetH
How difficult would it be to artifically create or to word it better, 'induce' this quake?
The largest thermonuclears of the cold war could not have even grazed the plates enough to make the move
well i dont know enough about geology to know this, but if you are clearly stating that they could not have grazed the plates enough then i guess you must. Please could you elaborate on this? and possibly cite some evidence/research studies.
The sheer physics involved in "artificially" moving tectonic plates is enough evidence. You are talking trillions of tons of mass. Nothing on this earth could move such a massive part of the earth.
Ok, i understand what you are saying. But could a series of nuclear blasts instigate a geological event that then became responsible for moving the plates?
A 0.00001% chance, like the plates would have had to have been on the very verge of giving way, and no one can predict when that happens.
|
Ojc
Member
Registered: 14th Nov 00
Location: Reading: Drives : Clio 197
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ian
quote:
Originally posted by SetH
i expect we will get roasted for thinking like this though.
Not at all, considering all the facts is a sensible thing to do. However, I do feel Oly has not thought this one through though. For one this quake was a natural phenomenon and secondly what is the warning system going to do? Text everyone?
I agree with you Ian, I have not really thought this through I just wanted to see if people were thinking on the same lines as me and whether there is a general intrest in the matter.
Yes, I woke up with these thoughts this morning and its something going around in my head.
I have not spoken to my friends on the Axis History Forum, very intelligent chaps.
[Edited on 04-01-2005 by Ojc]
|
Jodi_the_g
Member
Registered: 7th Aug 01
Location: Washington D.C
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Cybermonkey24
quote:
Originally posted by Jodi_the_g
quote:
Originally posted by Ojc
But then again you do NEED major disasters now and again to keep the population of the planet down.
Could not agree more with this. or a couple of wars, to many people to support the food chain in some countrys
I aslo disagree with goverments giving them money as its from tax payers in there own country if we are perfect in the UK then fine but we not. So why give them money would they do the same no.
You arrogant fuckwit, i hope you fall down a large hole.
lol maybe i can get funding from the goverment for it. I not saying don't give money i did myself its just i don't agree with goverments giving money.
We could of expending wemebly stadium for that.
|
SetH
Member
Registered: 15th Jul 01
User status: Offline
|
You are being very precise with the % chance that you have attributed to the possibility of this event occuring. I feel that you are a serious ass professor of geology!
|
3CorsaMeal
Member
Registered: 11th Apr 02
User status: Offline
|
eveything we know is just theory, anything could happen to the earth and we presume we know, because someone has invented a theory, we all believe what we're told basically, the earth may not even be made of molten rock etc,
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Jodi_the_g
quote:
Originally posted by Cybermonkey24
quote:
Originally posted by Jodi_the_g
quote:
Originally posted by Ojc
But then again you do NEED major disasters now and again to keep the population of the planet down.
Could not agree more with this. or a couple of wars, to many people to support the food chain in some countrys
I aslo disagree with goverments giving them money as its from tax payers in there own country if we are perfect in the UK then fine but we not. So why give them money would they do the same no.
You arrogant fuckwit, i hope you fall down a large hole.
lol maybe i can get funding from the goverment for it. I not saying don't give money i did myself its just i don't agree with goverments giving money.
We could of expending wemebly stadium for that.
People are dying. British people are dying too. I believe when tragedies as big as this one happen, it is in the world's best interest to help out as best they can. We are all going to suffer from this in some way. Mostly economical though. Markets will slump for sure.
|
Ojc
Member
Registered: 14th Nov 00
Location: Reading: Drives : Clio 197
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Cybermonkey24
Markets will slump for sure.
Nail on head, the effects of this are likely to effect the whole world, surely this is a consipiracy theory in its self, as David has show there was 4 hours!! thats a very long time from the earthquake to Tsuami hitting the countries it affected.
[Edited on 04-01-2005 by Ojc]
|
Jodi_the_g
Member
Registered: 7th Aug 01
Location: Washington D.C
User status: Offline
|
only 200 brisitsh people died less than what die my road traffic addents each year, why not invest it on british roads.
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Jodi_the_g
only 200 brisitsh people died less than what die my road traffic addents each year, why not invest it on british roads.
I think you should have been one of them.
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ojc
quote:
Originally posted by Cybermonkey24
Markets will slump for sure.
Nail on head, the effects of this are likely to effect the whole world, surely this is a consipiracy theory in its self.
Osama has been a busy lad
|
Ojc
Member
Registered: 14th Nov 00
Location: Reading: Drives : Clio 197
User status: Offline
|
You mean George W Bush has been busy, stupid fcukwit.
[Edited on 04-01-2005 by Ojc]
|
