Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
Just seen it now on Sky Sports, looks like Chelsea cant sign everyone they want by throwing money at them! Although he should of come to Liverpool!
|
wezjax
Member
Registered: 28th Mar 02
Location: mansfield,notts
User status: Offline
|
to exspensive for liverpool.
potentially a great player but it's alot of money for an unproven player.
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by wezjax
to exspensive for liverpool.
potentially a great player but it's alot of money for an unproven player.
we've got more cash to spend than Arsenal! We got 25mil for winning the Champ League last year, and he already had 20+ mil to spend anyway as he hasnt really spent too much.
|
GREG 1
Member
Registered: 28th Jul 00
Location: Essex
User status: Offline
|
Alot of money, good potential, will be interesting.
Dan't blame him for not joining the mightly blues because he won't get played as much, just look at wright-phillips.
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by GREG 1
Alot of money, good potential, will be interesting.
Dan't blame him for not joining the mightly blues because he won't get played as much, just look at wright-phillips.
Chelski only signed SWP to stop Arsenal or Liverpool signing him!
|
MR2Mike
Member
Registered: 20th Jan 05
Location: Old Trafford. Drives: MR2 N/A
User status: Offline
|
any youngsters who would choose to join chelsea would be mad! arsenal was the right choice for him out of those two.
|
wezjax
Member
Registered: 28th Mar 02
Location: mansfield,notts
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Cosmo
quote: Originally posted by wezjax
to exspensive for liverpool.
potentially a great player but it's alot of money for an unproven player.
we've got more cash to spend than Arsenal! We got 25mil for winning the Champ League last year, and he already had 20+ mil to spend anyway as he hasnt really spent too much.
i don't believe we have that much money to spend. the club are looking for investment and will have to re-coup the money spent on houlliers flops.
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by wezjax
i don't believe we have that much money to spend. the club are looking for investment and will have to re-coup the money spent on houlliers flops.
club are looking for investment to move the club forward (stadium and general behind the scenes stuff). The money has always been there for players if and when Rafa wants them.
|
Tom
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: Wirral, Merseyside
User status: Offline
|
We've got at least 7 or 8 mil for another player imo.
|
wezjax
Member
Registered: 28th Mar 02
Location: mansfield,notts
User status: Offline
|
i agree, not much more tho'.
|
MarkM
Member
Registered: 11th Apr 01
Location: Liverpool
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Cosmo
quote: Originally posted by GREG 1
Alot of money, good potential, will be interesting.
Dan't blame him for not joining the mightly blues because he won't get played as much, just look at wright-phillips.
Chelski only signed SWP to stop Arsenal or Liverpool signing him!
Which is what there trying to do with Simao...they want to buy him then loan him back to Benfica for thr season...so they dont really need him..
There just buying the title away from everyone else...
The sooner Abramovic fucks off the better for english football..
|
Ojc
Member
Registered: 14th Nov 00
Location: Reading: Drives : Clio 197
User status: Offline
|
Abramovic is coming to Ipswich
|
J da Silva
Member
Registered: 10th Apr 03
Location: The FACTory
User status: Offline
|
I think teams should be limited to how many players they buy per transfer window, so if a team hasn't got many superstars, it will bring the youth academy players into first team football, thus bringing the English game to a better standard.
|
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by wezjax
potentially a great player but it's alot of money for an unproven player.
Agreed
|
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Cosmo
Chelski only signed SWP to stop Arsenal or Liverpool signing him!
Agreed
|
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by VenomTurbo
I think teams should be limited to how many players they buy per transfer window, so if a team hasn't got many superstars, it will bring the youth academy players into first team football, thus bringing the English game to a better standard.
Agreed
|
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
Oh yeah, yayyyyyyyyyyy
|
Cavey
Member
Registered: 11th Nov 02
Location: Derby
User status: Offline
|
12 million for a 16 year old, wonder if that will go to his head 
tbh, glad he joined Arsenal from what i've ready he's a speedy striker with a decent touch, and now he's got a chance to learn from the best (of that type of striker) in the world, so should be good for the lad
|
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
Yep
|
buckley
Member
Registered: 1st Jun 02
Location: GM
User status: Offline
|
hope he does'nt turn into another jermaine pennant!
|
VegasPhil
Premium Member
Registered: 16th Jan 05
Location: Fareham, Hants Drives: Octavia VRS
User status: Offline
|
Let's hope Saint's buy a Player with the Dosh.
Bet it goes straight into Rupert Lowe's Pocket
Corsa 2.0 16v Vegas - Sold
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Robbo
quote: Originally posted by wezjax
potentially a great player but it's alot of money for an unproven player.
Agreed
Dont even get me started on this Walcott crap.
Good player, has showed some nice touches etc.... bit £12,000,000??? Do me a favour, Michael Owen only cost a couple of million more, know which of the two i'd rather have.....
|
MarkM
Member
Registered: 11th Apr 01
Location: Liverpool
User status: Offline
|
He has hasnt cost 12 million...they have paid 5 million or so upfront and the rest depending on appearances etc...
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
Fair enough. Kept hearing £12mil being mentioned.
|
MarkM
Member
Registered: 11th Apr 01
Location: Liverpool
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Nath
Fair enough. Kept hearing £12mil being mentioned.
Its ok...the fee will eventually rise to 12 million odd but only after he has played so many games etc...which if he does that will probably mean that the 12 million they paid has been a bargain...
However they have invested mainly in the lads potential...
|