Theory of Attractiveness in Relation to Exposure of Cleavage - Corsa Sport - for Vauxhall and Opel Corsa B, Corsa C and Corsa D

Not logged in [Login - Register]

You Are Not Registered Or Not Logged In

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Off Day » Theory of Attractiveness in Relation to Exposure of Cleavage

New Topic

New Poll

Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.

Lawrah

Premium Member

Registered: 25th Dec 04
User status: Offline

18th Apr 08 at 19:12

While the attractiveness of a female can differ widely depending on the observer, we shall assume for this theory that the attractiveness of the the female test subjects has been determined by an impartial, typical, straight male of age 21-25.

Taking three test subjects, one of whom is rated as being 0.9 in the attractiveness scale (popularly known as the Hefner Scale), the second being 0.5 and the last being 0.0 (known commonly as a "dug"). The introduction of cleavage to subject A raises her attractiveness by a negligable amount, resulting in an attractiveness rating of 0.981, for subject B it raises it to 0.625 and for subject C ir remains at 0.0.

An additional subject D was added with an initial attractiveness rating of 0.8. The addition of cleavage raised this to 0.928.

The Cleavage Multiplier Formula provides a means of calculating the benefit the addition of cleavage brings for women based on their initial attractiveness rating. The formula can be expressed as:

(((-((((AR*2)-1))^2)+2)/4)+0.75) where AR is the attractiveness rating.

This produces a graph as shown in Fig. 1 (see attached file). As the reader will note, the benefits of cleavage peak for a woman of average attractiveness, but for women at either end of the scale, the effect is negligable. Cleavage cannot enhance what is not there, nor what is already close to perfection.

Figure 2 provides a graph showing the resulting attractiveness rating when the cleavage multiplier is applied. While largley linear, offering a boost for those in the middle of the range, there is a noteable flattening off at the far end of the scale.

In conclusion, cleavage is most effective for women who are already mildly attractive while offering little or no enhancement to those women who are already stunningly beautiful. Similarly, cleavage cannot create attractiveness where none exists.