Ojc
Member
Registered: 14th Nov 00
Location: Reading: Drives : Clio 197
User status: Offline
|
And nuclear weapons don't exactly have the biggest of blast yields either, ok bigger than convential but still not massive, its the resulting radiation which is the biggest killer.
You couldn't destroy this country with 3 nuclear weapons, you will need 000's of them to do the job.
The bigger fuel air bombs are far more destructive and have no draw backs of radiation, I have no idea why nobody uses them Consipracy anyone?
|
Dean_W
Member
Registered: 13th Dec 05
Location: Downham Market, Norfolk
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Ojc
Consipracy anyone?
Whats your theory then?
|
andy1868
Member
Registered: 22nd Jun 06
Location: Burscough, Lancashire
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Ojc
The bigger fuel air bombs are far more destructive and have no draw backs of radiation, I have no idea why nobody uses them Consipracy anyone?
have you SEEN the price of petrol these days!? 
i'm joking, but you could have a good point there. admittedly theres less of a stigma with fuel air bombs. i honestly know nothing about them, do they need an aircraft to drop them? or can they be shot in ICBM form? if they need an aircraft surely this is a big drawback because of the chance of being intercepted etc
|
Ojc
Member
Registered: 14th Nov 00
Location: Reading: Drives : Clio 197
User status: Offline
|
Smaller than nukes, can be delievered by missile.
|
andy1868
Member
Registered: 22nd Jun 06
Location: Burscough, Lancashire
User status: Offline
|
hmmmm who's to say then?
|
Russ
Member
Registered: 14th Mar 04
Location: Armchair
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Rob_Lee
quote: Originally posted by Russ
there will never be a nuclear war imho. Einstein once said, i dont know what weapons will be used in WW3 but WW4 will be fought with sticks and stones. btw, china has a huge army, but not as specialised as us and yanks.
He's saying that because he believes in WW3 we will destroy everything and put ourselves back into a stone age
i know... thats why there'll never be a nuclear war. cos we'd have to start over :X
|
Adam
Member
Registered: 1st May 01
Location: Hurstbourne Tarrant
User status: Offline
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/6043610.stm
|
drunkenfool
Member
Registered: 7th Feb 03
Location: Hereford Drives: Audi R8 V8
User status: Offline
|
Sorry but Trey Parker and Matt Stone got it soooo right I know this is a serious topic, but still 


[Edited on 18-10-2006 by drunkenfool]
|
ShEp
Member
Registered: 9th Aug 05
Location: Dingwall, Highland
User status: Offline
|
i look at it as soon as one nuclear bomb has been fired there will be a retaliation shot b4 it lands,
and for arguments sake, if its korea firing at the uk then USA gets involved then china and before you know it there's fuck all left, so dont worry about it, the 1st u know about a bomb being released will be the last you'll know of it 
pesimistic way to look at things but thats what will happen
|