corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » Torque vs BHP


New Topic

New Poll
  <<  1    2  >> Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.


Author Torque vs BHP
Paul_J
Member

Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
14th May 06 at 21:21   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

The perfect example

N/A AC Cobra. 5 litre V8.

Makes peak power of 225 bhp @ 4200 but has 300 lb ft of torque @ 3000 rpm

NO FI.

http://www.pistonheads.com/fastcars/ac/cobra.asp

Merely only because it makes peak power so low (torque drops off quickly after its peaks / also peak torque is low).
Jules S
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 24th Dec 03
User status: Offline
14th May 06 at 21:31   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Paul_J
The perfect example

N/A AC Cobra. 5 litre V8.

Makes peak power of 225 bhp @ 4200 but has 300 lb ft of torque @ 3000 rpm

NO FI.

http://www.pistonheads.com/fastcars/ac/cobra.asp

Merely only because it makes peak power so low (torque drops off quickly after its peaks / also peak torque is low).



fair comment.

But a 5 litre car putting out peak torque at 3k rpm?
Paul_J
Member

Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
14th May 06 at 21:41   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

yes - because its a single overhead cam (on each side) lazy v8. Which just has shed loads of torque, but doesn't rev that high.

[Edited on 14-05-2006 by Paul_J]
SVM 286
Member

Registered: 13th Feb 05
Location: pain
User status: Offline
14th May 06 at 23:48   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Both my ZT and the Turbo make more torque than power and one is a V8, and the other is a force induced 4 cylinder.

Judging by how it drives i'd say my 6 pot Mercedes makes more torque than power also.



[Edited on 14-05-2006 by SVM 286]
davey_jack
Member

Registered: 28th Jan 06
Location: Horley, Surrey Drives: Clio 182
User status: Offline
27th Jun 06 at 22:11   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

well torque and power cant really be compared as they are measured in different units, however it is fair to make the comparison that a 16v engine will produce more power than an otherwise identical 8v engine, and the 8v engine will produce more torque.
davey_jack
Member

Registered: 28th Jan 06
Location: Horley, Surrey Drives: Clio 182
User status: Offline
27th Jun 06 at 22:13   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

sorry made a mistake here... the 8v engine will not produce more torque but it will produce its peak torque at a lower rpm
SVM 286
Member

Registered: 13th Feb 05
Location: pain
User status: Offline
27th Jun 06 at 22:15   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Jules S


A/. It's always been my understanding that its impossible to get higher lb/ft torque than BHP without forced induction? yes or no?




No Jules, my ZT is standard and normally aspirated and produces approx 260 bhp, yet it makes just over 300 lb ft.

The same will apply when it is supercharged, the torque will still exceed the horsepower.
Jules S
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 24th Dec 03
User status: Offline
27th Jun 06 at 22:37   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote



quote:
Originally posted by Paul_J
I think the problem is, everyone's got obsessed with top gear etc, talking about torque and bhp like they're completely different things - totally unrelated.

Torque is the turning power, but to get a high power figure you need that torque to extend for as far as you can on the revs (or keep increasing ideally)

"A computerized engine dynamometer accurately measures torque and rpm and then can accurately calculate horsepower."

A rolling road isn't measuring power, it's measuring the torque (turning force) of the wheels - and the rpm at which this is . then using the formula I've already spoken about calculate the power.

Thus as I've said it before, if you have a car that makes all its power low down in the revs (like a Turbo Diesel) you get a larger torque figure than a peak power figure.

The reason it has so much torque is due to the turbo, the reason it makes the torque so low down is due to being a diesel.

This is a stupid and pointless post / question.


I just noticed this, since the thread was bumped.

To be honest, using equations to work out flywheel bhp is pointless....too many variables to take into account.

My tuning so far acheives peak torque (and a pretty much flat torque to the limiter) at the revvs the engine falls to when changing up at the limiter.

I dont have the graphs yet, may get them done on monday when its serviced
Paul_J
Member

Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
27th Jun 06 at 22:40   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Torque is the only thing really being measured.

BHP is merely a calculation of the torque based on what rpm it is at and divided by 5252. This is all BHP is.
Paul_J
Member

Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
27th Jun 06 at 22:45   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

http://www.pumaracing.co.uk/power1.htm

This explains what torque + power is, and how they are calculated. read it, it makes a lot of sense.
Ry_B
Banned

Registered: 1st Dec 05
Location: Solihull, W Mids Drives: 45BHP beast!
User status: Offline
27th Jun 06 at 22:47   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Welcome back to the top
Paul_J
Member

Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
27th Jun 06 at 22:50   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Power and torque are just twin aspects of the same maths that determines how an engine performs and anyone wanting to tune an engine ought to benefit from a better understanding of the what the figures mean.

Horsepower = Torque x rpm / 5252.

This is the universal equation that links torque and horsepower. It doesn't matter whether we are talking about petrol engines, diesel engines or steam engines. If we know the rpm and the torque we can calculate horsepower. If we know horsepower and rpm we can calculate torque by rearranging the equation above:

Torque = Horsepower x 5252 / rpm

Most people have at least a vague idea what horsepower is but very little understanding of torque.

Paul_J
Member

Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
27th Jun 06 at 22:51   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Effectively based on that logic and answer to your original question jules S

Any car that makes peak power BELOW 5252 will have less peak power than peak torque

Anything that makes Peak Power above 5252 should have more peak power than peak torque.

Just due to how each are worked out.
Robin
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 7th Jan 04
Location: Northants Drives: Clio 182 Cup
User status: Offline
27th Jun 06 at 22:52   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

thread can go now then
Jules S
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 24th Dec 03
User status: Offline
27th Jun 06 at 22:52   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Paul_J
http://www.pumaracing.co.uk/power1.htm

This explains what torque + power is, and how they are calculated. read it, it makes a lot of sense.


Too true Paul,

Read that before......Not disputing that paper.

However it only relates to bench tested engines, not ones measured on a RR.

Since the torque/bhp is measured at the wheels, other factors have to be taken into account.

Since i read yours, try reading mine. IMO (and I know the bloke well, does the tuning on my vx) it's probably the most honest assessment ive seen...

Always good debate with you dude


>clicky<
Ry_B
Banned

Registered: 1st Dec 05
Location: Solihull, W Mids Drives: 45BHP beast!
User status: Offline
27th Jun 06 at 22:53   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

End of the discussion now then
Paul_J
Member

Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
27th Jun 06 at 22:55   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

ah touche

Fair play jules, yeh I agree it's not gonna give an accurate fly figure - as it's measured at the wheels at the end of the day.

Only true fly figure is to take the engine out and dyno it at the fly.

That wasn't really what I was debating - but fair play.
DarkBahamut
Member

Registered: 4th Jun 06
Location: Cambridge, Cambridgeshire
User status: Offline
27th Jun 06 at 23:04   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Paul_J
Effectively based on that logic and answer to your original question jules S

Any car that makes peak power BELOW 5252 will have less peak power than peak torque

Anything that makes Peak Power above 5252 should have more peak power than peak torque.

Just due to how each are worked out.


Thats what i thought too, but the haynes manual for the corsa says otherwise. That said, im 99% sure the haynes manual has the wrong engine specs listed for the C14NZ, so...
Jules S
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 24th Dec 03
User status: Offline
27th Jun 06 at 23:05   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote



Hence John Thornes comments on the link I posted.

I totally respect him for saying that. He's sort of shot himself in the foot by alienating himself from others who 'claim' massive headline bhp figures, when at the end of the day its not all about that.

Thats why he's only quoting stuff at the wheels now, and has endeavoured to get the figures as accurate a possible using a strict regime about tying down/cooling etc.

Ive spunked about 2k on my engine at the mo.....little headline bhp increase (yet to be measured on mine) but its a far better engine....highest torque in the right areas of the range
Paul_J
Member

Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
27th Jun 06 at 23:14   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Yeh which is where you want it

Pff who wants shed loads of torque at 3k rpm and then it all disapears (ala most diesel turbos today).

The problem is, most of joe public has always fantastised about Peak BHP.

Now with more people talking about Torque, a lot of people fantastise about big peak Torque figures.

But at the end of the day, they're effectively talking about the same thing - what they should be looking at is how the torque is delivered and how useable it is.
Jules S
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 24th Dec 03
User status: Offline
27th Jun 06 at 23:32   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Paul_J
Yeh which is where you want it

Pff who wants shed loads of torque at 3k rpm and then it all disapears (ala most diesel turbos today).

The problem is, most of joe public has always fantastised about Peak BHP.

Now with more people talking about Torque, a lot of people fantastise about big peak Torque figures.

But at the end of the day, they're effectively talking about the same thing - what they should be looking at is how the torque is delivered and how useable it is.


Yup,

A typical example is a vtec engine....lots of power and torque when in the 'zone'

Pretty poo in both respects and unusable when not in the 'zone'

Hence a close ratio 6 gear box to keep you in the powerband

timrud_
Member

Registered: 3rd Jul 04
Location: Sheffield
User status: Offline
28th Jun 06 at 10:12   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

I agree.
Andyrs1800
Member

Registered: 15th Oct 03
User status: Offline
28th Jun 06 at 13:53   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

My fiesta 1.8 Zetec had 116bhp and 123lbft so for a 116bhp car it was fair quick, it did feel like it had a lot more power, my mate had a standard rs1800 (130bhp 120lbft) and my car was spot on with his performance wise,

Now back do my cvic rant (i do like civic's by the way) the new shape type-r's have like 197bhp but are down on torque so dont feel like 200bhp thats why at the PV show they were doing 15.4ish all day where a standard red top corsa could do it a bit quicker with 50bhp less,

at the end of the day, if you have looads of torque your car wont be affected as badly by weight, ie, if you have loadsa torque you wont notice your car go slower when your fat mate gets in,

What was the question again?

  <<  1    2  >>
New Topic

New Poll

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » Torque vs BHP 24 database queries in 0.0349159 seconds