corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » Dump valves?


New Topic

New Poll
  <<  1    2  >> Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.


Author Dump valves?
James1
Member

Registered: 23rd Feb 04
Location: North Nottinghamshire: Drives Evolution VIII MR
User status: Offline
7th May 04 at 18:33   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Points taken thx!
Marc
Member

Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
7th May 04 at 18:34   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

i run a recirc
J da Silva
Member

Registered: 10th Apr 03
Location: The FACTory
User status: Offline
7th May 04 at 21:12   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

would you fit it between throttle plate and intercooler? or do evo's actually have them on the plate itself?
bubble
Member

Registered: 24th Jan 04
Location: Darwin, NT Australia.
User status: Offline
8th May 04 at 12:20   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

after reading all this about dump valves causing the ecu to adjust mixture etc causing detonation irregularitys i have to say bollox. functions of inputs to ecu's the process itself and the outputs are solely relied on by the sensors and actuators. a normal jorney in a car will see possible hundreds of changes in fuel mixture. booting your car when needing acceleration changes the ratio of fuel and air, coasting changes the ratio. temperature changes the ratio, fuel temperature changes the ratio. to say a atmo dv will change the ratio and drop pistons is bollox!!! yesh it may change the ratio of fuel/air due to a drop in atmospheric pressure of intake air etc, but every turbo setup is different on cars. the pictures of the fooked cylinder head is probably down to the owner running 38567 bar of boost, not a dv. please spang yourself silly.
Marc
Member

Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
8th May 04 at 12:40   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Bubblevaux, when your car detonates i shal pmsl.
bubble
Member

Registered: 24th Jan 04
Location: Darwin, NT Australia.
User status: Offline
8th May 04 at 12:42   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by 16vmarc
Bubblevaux, when your car detonates i shal pmsl.


my car is standard
Nismo
Member

Registered: 12th Sep 02
User status: Offline
8th May 04 at 12:52   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote



well it does good on my car and i cannot comment on other cars so i shall shurlup
tiga77
Member

Registered: 6th May 04
Location: Ilkeston, Derbyshire. MR2 Turbo GT T-Bar
User status: Offline
8th May 04 at 13:09   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

This is an extract from a guy called Chris Wilson who is a race car engine preparation and developer.

-----------------------------------------------
"For those sick of reading about my blow off valve saga, stop right now.
For those who would learn from my mistakes read on To those that
proffered advice, sincere thanks, it's been an interesting learning
curve.

The following is based on my Skyline experience, with air usage
measured by air flow meters before the turbos. It is not applicable to
cars that soley use a MAP sensor and throttle angle for air measurement .
To recap I put in a bigger intercooler and the standard Skyline duct
that runs across the lower front of the car taking dumped air from the
2 blow off valves to the intake between the air flow meters and the
twin turbo inlets was masking air exiting the lower 4 rows of the new
IC.

Having spent a good deal of money on this item it pained me to see some
of effectively blanked off. So I decided to blank the inlet off
altogether where the cross pipe entered the turbo inlet ducting, remove
the cross pipe and vent to atmosphere. The dump valves were being held
open at idle by the idle vacuum level, so after ages of pondering i
made a set up of solenoids to control when vacuum was applied to the
dump valves. This set up worked perfectly. *HOWEVER* a much more
serious problem occurred, which any similarly inducted turbo car will
potentially suffer if the boost air is dumped to atmosphere rather than
as standard into the air intakes after the AFM (s). On the overrun,
after a period of boost running, the standard set up will recirculate
the excess boost back into the turbos, through the IC, and back through
the dump valves to the turbo inlet again until the turbos inertia has
slowed them to the point of little or no boost. The AFM's do not see
any more air entering the engine, as it is being recirculated.

However, when we dump to atmosphere, that air is lost from the system
and the turbos draw in fresh air via the AFM (s). This causes the
engine to go mad rich, as the throttles are closed and no fuel is
really needed. Hence the black smoke seen on the overrun after my mods.
Worse still was a noticeable but very short period of detonation when
coming hard back on the throttle. This puzzled me totally, then it
dawned. As the fuel system started working normally again the Lambda
sensor "caught up" with what was happening, saw a very overly rich
mixture, and shut down the injector pulse width, creating a very lean
mixture, causing a brief, but very dangerous period of detonation!

I spent the afternoon and evening making new bracketry for the IC, new
hoses and adaptors and shifting the IC forward that critical 40 mm or
so, enabling me to fit the original moulded duct from the BOV's behind
the IC without blocking it. Quite a lot of work and fabrication...
However, the mod I was planning could well have caused damage, and is
certainly something to be very aware of if one has a similar AFM pre
turbo set up changed to dump boost to atmosphere. The type of BOV
matters not, it's the fact that the air no longer re circulates but is
lost from the system, confusing the AFM (s) into thinking the engine is
wanting more air/fuel mixture. An oscilloscope on the O2 sensors
confirmed what was happening. We live and learn, often the hard way,
but in this case not as hard a lesson as it might have been. I hope
this helps.

I can now finally make some proper seals to make sure all air entering
the radiator ducting passes through the IC, something HKS totally fail
to address, at the moment most air will go around rather than through
the IC core.

Best Regards,
Chris Wilson
http://www.formula3.demon.co.uk
(Race car and engine preparation and development)"



[Edited on 08-05-2004 by tiga77]
J da Silva
Member

Registered: 10th Apr 03
Location: The FACTory
User status: Offline
8th May 04 at 13:18   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by bubblevaux
after reading all this about dump valves causing the ecu to adjust mixture etc causing detonation irregularitys i have to say bollox. functions of inputs to ecu's the process itself and the outputs are solely relied on by the sensors and actuators. a normal jorney in a car will see possible hundreds of changes in fuel mixture. booting your car when needing acceleration changes the ratio of fuel and air, coasting changes the ratio. temperature changes the ratio, fuel temperature changes the ratio. to say a atmo dv will change the ratio and drop pistons is bollox!!! yesh it may change the ratio of fuel/air due to a drop in atmospheric pressure of intake air etc, but every turbo setup is different on cars. the pictures of the fooked cylinder head is probably down to the owner running 38567 bar of boost, not a dv. please spang yourself silly.



dump valves fixed to the top hat cause the unused boost to be metred but when the ecu tells the injection system to slam in some more fuel then where's that air thats just been metred?
vibrio
Banned

Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
8th May 04 at 17:14   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by tiga77
This is an extract from a guy called Chris Wilson who is a race car engine preparation and developer.

-----------------------------------------------
"For those sick of reading about my blow off valve saga, stop right now.
For those who would learn from my mistakes read on To those that
proffered advice, sincere thanks, it's been an interesting learning
curve.

The following is based on my Skyline experience, with air usage
measured by air flow meters before the turbos. It is not applicable to
cars that soley use a MAP sensor and throttle angle for air measurement .

To recap I put in a bigger intercooler and the standard Skyline duct
that runs across the lower front of the car taking dumped air from the
2 blow off valves to the intake between the air flow meters and the
twin turbo inlets was masking air exiting the lower 4 rows of the new
IC.

Having spent a good deal of money on this item it pained me to see some
of effectively blanked off. So I decided to blank the inlet off
altogether where the cross pipe entered the turbo inlet ducting, remove
the cross pipe and vent to atmosphere. The dump valves were being held
open at idle by the idle vacuum level, so after ages of pondering i
made a set up of solenoids to control when vacuum was applied to the
dump valves.
This set up worked perfectly. *HOWEVER* a much more
serious problem occurred, which any similarly inducted turbo car will
potentially suffer if the boost air is dumped to atmosphere rather than
as standard into the air intakes after the AFM (s). On the overrun,
after a period of boost running, the standard set up will recirculate
the excess boost back into the turbos, through the IC, and back through
the dump valves to the turbo inlet again until the turbos inertia has
slowed them to the point of little or no boost. The AFM's do not see
any more air entering the engine, as it is being recirculated.

However, when we dump to atmosphere, that air is lost from the system
and the turbos draw in fresh air via the AFM (s). This causes the
engine to go mad rich, as the throttles are closed and no fuel is
really needed. Hence the black smoke seen on the overrun after my mods.
Worse still was a noticeable but very short period of detonation when
coming hard back on the throttle. This puzzled me totally, then it
dawned. As the fuel system started working normally again the Lambda
sensor "caught up" with what was happening, saw a very overly rich
mixture, and shut down the injector pulse width, creating a very lean
mixture, causing a brief, but very dangerous period of detonation!

I spent the afternoon and evening making new bracketry for the IC, new
hoses and adaptors and shifting the IC forward that critical 40 mm or
so, enabling me to fit the original moulded duct from the BOV's behind
the IC without blocking it. Quite a lot of work and fabrication...
However, the mod I was planning could well have caused damage, and is
certainly something to be very aware of if one has a similar AFM pre
turbo set up changed to dump boost to atmosphere.
The type of BOV
matters not, it's the fact that the air no longer re circulates but is
lost from the system, confusing the AFM (s) into thinking the engine is
wanting more air/fuel mixture. An oscilloscope on the O2 sensors
confirmed what was happening. We live and learn, often the hard way,
but in this case not as hard a lesson as it might have been. I hope
this helps.

I can now finally make some proper seals to make sure all air entering
the radiator ducting passes through the IC, something HKS totally fail
to address, at the moment most air will go around rather than through
the IC core.

Best Regards,
Chris Wilson
http://www.formula3.demon.co.uk
(Race car and engine preparation and development)"



[Edited on 08-05-2004 by tiga77]



note the highlighted areas.

[Edited on 08-05-2004 by vibrio]
tiga77
Member

Registered: 6th May 04
Location: Ilkeston, Derbyshire. MR2 Turbo GT T-Bar
User status: Offline
8th May 04 at 17:35   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by vibrio
quote:
Originally posted by tiga77
This is an extract from a guy called Chris Wilson who is a race car engine preparation and developer.

-----------------------------------------------
"For those sick of reading about my blow off valve saga, stop right now.
For those who would learn from my mistakes read on To those that
proffered advice, sincere thanks, it's been an interesting learning
curve.

The following is based on my Skyline experience, with air usage
measured by air flow meters before the turbos. It is not applicable to
cars that soley use a MAP sensor and throttle angle for air measurement .

To recap I put in a bigger intercooler and the standard Skyline duct
that runs across the lower front of the car taking dumped air from the
2 blow off valves to the intake between the air flow meters and the
twin turbo inlets was masking air exiting the lower 4 rows of the new
IC.

Having spent a good deal of money on this item it pained me to see some
of effectively blanked off. So I decided to blank the inlet off
altogether where the cross pipe entered the turbo inlet ducting, remove
the cross pipe and vent to atmosphere. The dump valves were being held
open at idle by the idle vacuum level, so after ages of pondering i
made a set up of solenoids to control when vacuum was applied to the
dump valves.
This set up worked perfectly. *HOWEVER* a much more
serious problem occurred, which any similarly inducted turbo car will
potentially suffer if the boost air is dumped to atmosphere rather than
as standard into the air intakes after the AFM (s). On the overrun,
after a period of boost running, the standard set up will recirculate
the excess boost back into the turbos, through the IC, and back through
the dump valves to the turbo inlet again until the turbos inertia has
slowed them to the point of little or no boost. The AFM's do not see
any more air entering the engine, as it is being recirculated.

However, when we dump to atmosphere, that air is lost from the system
and the turbos draw in fresh air via the AFM (s). This causes the
engine to go mad rich, as the throttles are closed and no fuel is
really needed. Hence the black smoke seen on the overrun after my mods.
Worse still was a noticeable but very short period of detonation when
coming hard back on the throttle. This puzzled me totally, then it
dawned. As the fuel system started working normally again the Lambda
sensor "caught up" with what was happening, saw a very overly rich
mixture, and shut down the injector pulse width, creating a very lean
mixture, causing a brief, but very dangerous period of detonation!

I spent the afternoon and evening making new bracketry for the IC, new
hoses and adaptors and shifting the IC forward that critical 40 mm or
so, enabling me to fit the original moulded duct from the BOV's behind
the IC without blocking it. Quite a lot of work and fabrication...
However, the mod I was planning could well have caused damage, and is
certainly something to be very aware of if one has a similar AFM pre
turbo set up changed to dump boost to atmosphere.
The type of BOV
matters not, it's the fact that the air no longer re circulates but is
lost from the system, confusing the AFM (s) into thinking the engine is
wanting more air/fuel mixture. An oscilloscope on the O2 sensors
confirmed what was happening. We live and learn, often the hard way,
but in this case not as hard a lesson as it might have been. I hope
this helps.

I can now finally make some proper seals to make sure all air entering
the radiator ducting passes through the IC, something HKS totally fail
to address, at the moment most air will go around rather than through
the IC core.

Best Regards,
Chris Wilson
http://www.formula3.demon.co.uk
(Race car and engine preparation and development)"



[Edited on 08-05-2004 by tiga77]



note the highlighted areas.

[Edited on 08-05-2004 by vibrio]


Ive noted the highlighted areas and heres my comments:

1) The MAP sensor is an ALTERNATIVE to air flow meters - cars do not have both. MAP sensors have never been in question - so kinda pointless highlighting that bit. It does say "based on my experience, with air usage measured by air flow meters before the turbos. It is not applicable to cars that soley use a MAP sensor and throttle angle for air measurement"

2) The second bit you've highlighted basically says that he converted his car to dump to atmosphere. After noticing the dump valves were constantly open at idle (obviosuly in the form of a single dump valve unlike the twin piston bailey DV26 which resolves stalling issues at idle - and ONLY stalling issues at idle), did he create solenoids to essentially convert when the flange opened (basically like a twin piston dump valve but using solenoids on a single piston D/V). Nothing more to say here - basically that he converted his car from recir to dump to atmos.

3) Third bit youve highlighted - his car chucked out black smoke - shows my point that the dump to atmoshpere aint too good! Just cos other cars dont throw out black smoke doesnt mean its not happening.

4) Again the mod he was 'planning' was to leave his car to dump to atmosphere which would have caused damage. He then says that anyone with a similar AFM (air flow meter) before the turbo (as most do inc. MR2, impreza etc etc) NOT to dump to atmosphere.







[Edited on 08-05-2004 by tiga77]
Drew
Banned

Registered: 24th Nov 01
Location: County Durham
User status: Offline
8th May 04 at 17:41   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

oh who gives a fuck?
Marc
Member

Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
8th May 04 at 17:42   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Drewstons wish wellingtons!!!

vibrio
Banned

Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
8th May 04 at 17:55   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by tiga77
quote:
Originally posted by vibrio
quote:
Originally posted by tiga77
This is an extract from a guy called Chris Wilson who is a race car engine preparation and developer.

-----------------------------------------------
"For those sick of reading about my blow off valve saga, stop right now.
For those who would learn from my mistakes read on To those that
proffered advice, sincere thanks, it's been an interesting learning
curve.

The following is based on my Skyline experience, with air usage
measured by air flow meters before the turbos. It is not applicable to
cars that soley use a MAP sensor and throttle angle for air measurement .

To recap I put in a bigger intercooler and the standard Skyline duct
that runs across the lower front of the car taking dumped air from the
2 blow off valves to the intake between the air flow meters and the
twin turbo inlets was masking air exiting the lower 4 rows of the new
IC.

Having spent a good deal of money on this item it pained me to see some
of effectively blanked off. So I decided to blank the inlet off
altogether where the cross pipe entered the turbo inlet ducting, remove
the cross pipe and vent to atmosphere. The dump valves were being held
open at idle by the idle vacuum level, so after ages of pondering i
made a set up of solenoids to control when vacuum was applied to the
dump valves.
This set up worked perfectly. *HOWEVER* a much more
serious problem occurred, which any similarly inducted turbo car will
potentially suffer if the boost air is dumped to atmosphere rather than
as standard into the air intakes after the AFM (s). On the overrun,
after a period of boost running, the standard set up will recirculate
the excess boost back into the turbos, through the IC, and back through
the dump valves to the turbo inlet again until the turbos inertia has
slowed them to the point of little or no boost. The AFM's do not see
any more air entering the engine, as it is being recirculated.

However, when we dump to atmosphere, that air is lost from the system
and the turbos draw in fresh air via the AFM (s). This causes the
engine to go mad rich, as the throttles are closed and no fuel is
really needed. Hence the black smoke seen on the overrun after my mods.
Worse still was a noticeable but very short period of detonation when
coming hard back on the throttle. This puzzled me totally, then it
dawned. As the fuel system started working normally again the Lambda
sensor "caught up" with what was happening, saw a very overly rich
mixture, and shut down the injector pulse width, creating a very lean
mixture, causing a brief, but very dangerous period of detonation!

I spent the afternoon and evening making new bracketry for the IC, new
hoses and adaptors and shifting the IC forward that critical 40 mm or
so, enabling me to fit the original moulded duct from the BOV's behind
the IC without blocking it. Quite a lot of work and fabrication...
However, the mod I was planning could well have caused damage, and is
certainly something to be very aware of if one has a similar AFM pre
turbo set up changed to dump boost to atmosphere.
The type of BOV
matters not, it's the fact that the air no longer re circulates but is
lost from the system, confusing the AFM (s) into thinking the engine is
wanting more air/fuel mixture. An oscilloscope on the O2 sensors
confirmed what was happening. We live and learn, often the hard way,
but in this case not as hard a lesson as it might have been. I hope
this helps.

I can now finally make some proper seals to make sure all air entering
the radiator ducting passes through the IC, something HKS totally fail
to address, at the moment most air will go around rather than through
the IC core.

Best Regards,
Chris Wilson
http://www.formula3.demon.co.uk
(Race car and engine preparation and development)"



[Edited on 08-05-2004 by tiga77]



note the highlighted areas.

[Edited on 08-05-2004 by vibrio]


Ive noted the highlighted areas and heres my comments:

1) The MAP sensor is an ALTERNATIVE to air flow meters - cars do not have both. MAP sensors have never been in question - so kinda pointless highlighting that bit. It does say "based on my experience, with air usage measured by air flow meters before the turbos. It is not applicable to cars that soley use a MAP sensor and throttle angle for air measurement"

2) The second bit you've highlighted basically says that he converted his car to dump to atmosphere. After noticing the dump valves were constantly open at idle (obviosuly in the form of a single dump valve unlike the twin piston bailey DV26 which resolves stalling issues at idle - and ONLY stalling issues at idle), did he create solenoids to essentially convert when the flange opened (basically like a twin piston dump valve but using solenoids on a single piston D/V). Nothing more to say here - basically that he converted his car from recir to dump to atmos.

3) Third bit youve highlighted - his car chucked out black smoke - shows my point that the dump to atmoshpere aint too good! Just cos other cars dont throw out black smoke doesnt mean its not happening.

4) Again the mod he was 'planning' was to leave his car to dump to atmosphere which would have caused damage. He then says that anyone with a similar AFM (air flow meter) before the turbo (as most do inc. MR2, impreza etc etc) NOT to dump to atmosphere.







[Edited on 08-05-2004 by tiga77]



1/ duh

2/ can't trust the opinon of a tunner that tried to work a standard recirc as a VTA DV

3/ mine nor anyone elses that I know of chucked out black smoke when changing gear or lifting off throttle when VTA valves are fitted. the reason for his car doing it is more likely down to the tuning it has had. (black smoke overfueling)

4/ most turbo cars do work with VTA valves. some like the VAG 20VT don't often work. some people however do run them and they work fine. also if they are that bad why would a lot of tunners of high performace engines put them on their cars. I doubt they don't do tests to make sure the car does not pink.

one other thing I would have to say is that if you run a cone filter and run a recirc valve you get discharge of the dumped air going back through the AFM and out through the filter. also once the boost has been dumped the turbo has to spin up again sucking air in (going through AFM) getting back up to full boost (ECU measures the amount of boost at manifold). Running an VTA DV may well cause small changes in the Air/fuel ratio straight after changing gear on some cars but this change will be insignificant if the car is mapped properly. for my car to run significantly lean after changing gear would mean a lot of petrol not being injected (plus my car don't use the lambda at full throttle over 3000rpm anyway)


my views on DV's are

VTA - fine if your a ned/pikey and want to make your car sneeze and increase lag between gear changes

Recirc - if you want the best performance you can get and reduced lag between gear changes.
vibrio
Banned

Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
8th May 04 at 18:06   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

I'm still laughing at the wastegate chatter
tiga77
Member

Registered: 6th May 04
Location: Ilkeston, Derbyshire. MR2 Turbo GT T-Bar
User status: Offline
8th May 04 at 18:16   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Ive noted the highlighted areas and heres my comments:

1) The MAP sensor is an ALTERNATIVE to air flow meters - cars do not have both. MAP sensors have never been in question - so kinda pointless highlighting that bit. It does say "based on my experience, with air usage measured by air flow meters before the turbos. It is not applicable to cars that soley use a MAP sensor and throttle angle for air measurement"

2) The second bit you've highlighted basically says that he converted his car to dump to atmosphere. After noticing the dump valves were constantly open at idle (obviosuly in the form of a single dump valve unlike the twin piston bailey DV26 which resolves stalling issues at idle - and ONLY stalling issues at idle), did he create solenoids to essentially convert when the flange opened (basically like a twin piston dump valve but using solenoids on a single piston D/V). Nothing more to say here - basically that he converted his car from recir to dump to atmos.

3) Third bit youve highlighted - his car chucked out black smoke - shows my point that the dump to atmoshpere aint too good! Just cos other cars dont throw out black smoke doesnt mean its not happening.

4) Again the mod he was 'planning' was to leave his car to dump to atmosphere which would have caused damage. He then says that anyone with a similar AFM (air flow meter) before the turbo (as most do inc. MR2, impreza etc etc) NOT to dump to atmosphere.

[Edited on 08-05-2004 by tiga77]



1/ duh - If you knew a simple thing like this what was your point in highlighting it???

2/ can't trust the opinon of a tunner that tried to work a standard recirc as a VTA DV - Cant trust or wont give in? This guy is an engine expert and has a good reputation in the formula 3 series. Search for his name, Im sure you'll find something .

3/ mine nor anyone elses that I know of chucked out black smoke when changing gear or lifting off throttle when VTA valves are fitted. the reason for his car doing it is more likely down to the tuning it has had. (black smoke overfueling) - It may well be the tuning its had but still doesnt change the issue of overfuel/underfuel = detonation.


4/ most turbo cars do work with VTA valves. some like the VAG 20VT don't often work. some people however do run them and they work fine. also if they are that bad why would a lot of tunners of high performace engines put them on their cars. I doubt they don't do tests to make sure the car does not pink.- Thats right, a lot of cars do work with VTA D/V's - Ive never disputed that. MR2's and Imprezas will run with hardly any noticeable difference with a twin piston D/V. The point is, what is going on INSIDE the engine. Just cos you cant see detonation, doesnt mean its not happening.


one other thing I would have to say is that if you run a cone filter and run a recirc valve you get discharge of the dumped air going back through the AFM and out through the filter. also once the boost has been dumped the turbo has to spin up again sucking air in (going through AFM) getting back up to full boost (ECU measures the amount of boost at manifold). Running an VTA DV may well cause small changes in the Air/fuel ratio straight after changing gear on some cars but this change will be insignificant if the car is mapped properly. for my car to run significantly lean after changing gear would mean a lot of petrol not being injected (plus my car don't use the lambda at full throttle over 3000rpm anyway)

That is true - but over time with a VTA D/V, regardless how small the detonation may be, over time = damage, which is what Ive been saying all along.

my views on DV's are

VTA - Fine if youve got a MAP sensor or run a standalone system like the Motec/Link unit which erradicates the use of AFM.

Recirc - if you want the best performance you can get and reduced lag between gear changes. Agreed


Is this discussion over now??
[Edited on 08-05-2004 by tiga77]

[Edited on 08-05-2004 by tiga77]
tiga77
Member

Registered: 6th May 04
Location: Ilkeston, Derbyshire. MR2 Turbo GT T-Bar
User status: Offline
8th May 04 at 18:50   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by vibrio
I'm still laughing at the wastegate chatter


And why's that?


http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread/t-544349.html

just incase you didnt know what it was - cant really trust your knowledge

  <<  1    2  >>
New Topic

New Poll

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » Dump valves? 23 database queries in 0.2017319 seconds