Don't get me wrong, digital 'is' the future, theres no doubt about it. Im very much a purist, while I can see that digital has more popularity and so many good qualities, for me, nothing beats the whole film 'mechanics'. Actually having the negative (or positive), the cellulose, the chemicals, the light sensitive paper and the big clunky click you get when you press the shutter, then the anticipation of getting your prints back the next day, having to compose your shot through the viewfinder (or waist level finder which I tend to use)

Like I say, I totally appreciate what digital has done for the masses, but for me, i just love film :)

film gives good colour and contrast. but digitial is soo much faster and cheaper.

Im more than happy with my Mamiya 645, mind you, the cost of lenses alone totals £2k and the body and prisms came to over £1k at the time I'd love the RZ67 though but im not ready to trade the 645 in. They are both a real true workhorse. To be perfectly honest, I dont really trust digital cameras - too much to go wrong, I know that my mamiya will still take pictures with no battery, may I add, this is my opinion and I know there will be different views.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Icy
mamiya rb67 :thumbs: or rz

---

mamiya rb67 :thumbs: or rz

quote:

---

Originally posted by Icy
found some 120mm iso3200 ilford film i dont want ;)

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Icy
found some 120mm iso3200 ilford film i dont want ;)

---

loving the last 3, good work my peverse scottish friend :thumbs:

found some 120mm iso3200 ilford film i dont want ;)

used 10-22, 30mm f1.4 and 70-200 f2.8 all wide open iso 1600 shutter speeds vaired from 1/20s to 1/80s depending on the light and if I over/under exposed

nice :thumbs:
what shutter speed n lense?

Good pics

B/W ones are ace!!! All looks nice though!

Cracking pics, Please Stand Up is a quality choon