corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Off Day » Geek Day » Can someone settle an argument for me. » Post Reply

Post Reply
Who Can Post? All users can post new topics and all users can reply.
Icon:
Formatting Mode:
Normal
Advanced
Help

Insert Bold text Insert Italicized text Insert Underlined text Insert Centered text Insert a Hyperlink Insert Email Hyperlink Insert an Image Insert Code Formatted text Insert Quoted text
Message:
HTML is Off
Smilies are On
BB Code is On
[img] Code is On
Post Options: Disable smileys?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email notification of new replies?

Welsh Dan

posted on 24th Jun 10 at 21:01

I watched one of the LG 3d TVs without glasses in Harrods. It made me feel sick within a few minutes :o


dannymccann

posted on 24th Jun 10 at 18:52

quote:
Originally posted by AndyKent
quote:
Originally posted by Paul_J
quote:
Originally posted by adiohead
there's the new Nintendo 3DS that doesn't require glasses too.



That's what I was going to say.

I read an article that said you should hold off buying a 3D tv for 2 reasons

1 - The technology is improving fast - You could buy one now, but in 6 months or a year it'd be quite dated compared to the newer ones which will get released (better / smoother / faster)

2 - The long term health effects are currently unknown. It is said to potentially effect the eye long term / cause similar effects as strobing. The long term effects will be tried to be resolved in newer hardware (see point 1 )


Plus, sitting I your living room wearing glasses when you don't normally wear anything would annoy me greatly. Don't know about anyone else, but I'll still with a regular 2D picture for now :lol:


We arent even on Sky yet, let alone HD, i think 3D in our house is a good few years away yet :lol:


AndyKent

posted on 24th Jun 10 at 16:22

quote:
Originally posted by Paul_J
quote:
Originally posted by adiohead
there's the new Nintendo 3DS that doesn't require glasses too.



That's what I was going to say.

I read an article that said you should hold off buying a 3D tv for 2 reasons

1 - The technology is improving fast - You could buy one now, but in 6 months or a year it'd be quite dated compared to the newer ones which will get released (better / smoother / faster)

2 - The long term health effects are currently unknown. It is said to potentially effect the eye long term / cause similar effects as strobing. The long term effects will be tried to be resolved in newer hardware (see point 1 )


Plus, sitting I your living room wearing glasses when you don't normally wear anything would annoy me greatly. Don't know about anyone else, but I'll still with a regular 2D picture for now :lol:


John

posted on 24th Jun 10 at 16:07

3DS screen works only if you are looking directly at the screen, which is what you will mostly be doing, thats why there's no glasses.


Paul_J

posted on 24th Jun 10 at 15:58

quote:
Originally posted by adiohead
there's the new Nintendo 3DS that doesn't require glasses too.



That's what I was going to say.

I read an article that said you should hold off buying a 3D tv for 2 reasons

1 - The technology is improving fast - You could buy one now, but in 6 months or a year it'd be quite dated compared to the newer ones which will get released (better / smoother / faster)

2 - The long term health effects are currently unknown. It is said to potentially effect the eye long term / cause similar effects as strobing. The long term effects will be tried to be resolved in newer hardware (see point 1 )


gravesy

posted on 24th Jun 10 at 15:30

quote:
Originally posted by adiohead
there's the new Nintendo 3DS that doesn't require glasses too.



[Edited on 24-06-2010 by adiohead]


Jackie Chan gets about doesn't he.


adiohead

posted on 24th Jun 10 at 11:32

there's the new Nintendo 3DS that doesn't require glasses too.



[Edited on 24-06-2010 by adiohead]


AndyKent

posted on 24th Jun 10 at 09:28

There was a good article on 3d TVs on Gizmodo earlier this week and it included a section on non-glasses systems.

Worth looking up if you want to find out a bit more detail.


jrsteeve

posted on 24th Jun 10 at 09:24

Gadget show had some sort of laptop that did 3D without needing glasses


John

posted on 24th Jun 10 at 08:59

They can do it without glasses currently, the problem is you need to be sitting at a couple of exact spots to get the effect, anything outside of that looks rubbish.

The human eye can't selectively filter different polarizations or left and right but that's not really the issue with no glasses 3d.


nathy_87

posted on 24th Jun 10 at 08:50

Yeah what Robbo said really, it projects the picture twice so it gives the effect its 3d


Robbo

posted on 24th Jun 10 at 07:43

you're both kind of wrong - the human eye can't do it IIRC but the newest 3D tellys have a double screen or somethign to simulate the effect of the galsses


Aaron

posted on 24th Jun 10 at 07:38

Hi

I'm having a "discussion" with a colleague of mine about 3D TV.

He's of the understanding that the human eye is able to watch 3D content on a TV without the use of the glasses.

He thinks that the newest 3D TV’s will allow people to be able to sit and watch 3D TV (with all the 3D effects) without having to wear glasses.

I think he's wrong, and that the human eye can't do this...am I wrong here, or is he?