corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Off Day » Geek Day » Lg Tv » Post Reply

Post Reply
Who Can Post? All users can post new topics and all users can reply.
Icon:
Formatting Mode:
Normal
Advanced
Help

Insert Bold text Insert Italicized text Insert Underlined text Insert Centered text Insert a Hyperlink Insert Email Hyperlink Insert an Image Insert Code Formatted text Insert Quoted text
Message:
HTML is Off
Smilies are On
BB Code is On
[img] Code is On
Post Options: Disable smileys?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email notification of new replies?

BarnshaW

posted on 19th May 10 at 09:08

i have yet to find a customer whom has a Plasma TV to last anywhere near that, they say the lifespan is 100k hours, there are so many other components which will more then likely fail before this time. However from a work perspective i can confirm that 100% where i work LCD's have a better lifespan and less of a failure rate.


Rob R

posted on 19th May 10 at 08:57

In all fairness who's going to be using the same TV for 18 years? Way technology goes must people will be chopping and changing every 3 years


BarnshaW

posted on 19th May 10 at 06:12

quote:
Originally posted by RCS
quote:
Originally posted by BarnshaW
quote:
Originally posted by Nismo
quote:
Originally posted by Andrew
Plasma is old technology though. Personally i'd be going for LCD over plasma all day long. Things that did it for me is the fact you won't burn an image into the screen and also running costs on are cheaper.


Plasma technology has moved on since then! Image burn takes a hell of a lot longer now and plasmas last upto 18 years now.

Theres pro's and cons on both, The pros on the Plasma out weighted the pros on an LCD for me.


i would like to see a plasma TV which lasts on average for 18 years, they use gasses and after so many years the gasses escape and make the set near redundant. Image retention can also happen after an hour aswell, i get so many sets at work which suffer it, especially in a commercial environment


The gasses do not escape. Plasma and LCD's have the same half life of around 60,000 hours of constant use.


yes they do, do you quite understand the difference between an LCD and a Plasma? do you know the average lifespan of of the actual TV's or are you just guessing?


Gareth

posted on 18th May 10 at 23:51

I always thought they expire, but they will still work just be dull!?


RCS

posted on 18th May 10 at 21:04

quote:
Originally posted by BarnshaW
quote:
Originally posted by Nismo
quote:
Originally posted by Andrew
Plasma is old technology though. Personally i'd be going for LCD over plasma all day long. Things that did it for me is the fact you won't burn an image into the screen and also running costs on are cheaper.


Plasma technology has moved on since then! Image burn takes a hell of a lot longer now and plasmas last upto 18 years now.

Theres pro's and cons on both, The pros on the Plasma out weighted the pros on an LCD for me.


i would like to see a plasma TV which lasts on average for 18 years, they use gasses and after so many years the gasses escape and make the set near redundant. Image retention can also happen after an hour aswell, i get so many sets at work which suffer it, especially in a commercial environment


The gasses do not escape. Plasma and LCD's have the same half life of around 60,000 hours of constant use.


Hammer

posted on 18th May 10 at 16:52

I've got the 50ps3000. 1080p FTW.

Think you can get them for 600 quid or therabouts now.


Andrew

posted on 18th May 10 at 13:49

I'd recomend LG all day long. Not had any issues with my 3 monitors and 2 TVs


BarnshaW

posted on 18th May 10 at 13:30

quote:
Originally posted by Nismo
quote:
Originally posted by Andrew
Plasma is old technology though. Personally i'd be going for LCD over plasma all day long. Things that did it for me is the fact you won't burn an image into the screen and also running costs on are cheaper.


Plasma technology has moved on since then! Image burn takes a hell of a lot longer now and plasmas last upto 18 years now.

Theres pro's and cons on both, The pros on the Plasma out weighted the pros on an LCD for me.


i would like to see a plasma TV which lasts on average for 18 years, they use gasses and after so many years the gasses escape and make the set near redundant. Image retention can also happen after an hour aswell, i get so many sets at work which suffer it, especially in a commercial environment


Ian W

posted on 18th May 10 at 12:11

Another vote for LG here, quality tv's.

My dad sold our 50" one and replaced it with a 50" Samsung and its shit !


Jambo

posted on 18th May 10 at 08:39

I have an LG lcd and the picture is better than my dads top of the line Panasonic plasma. I cant recomend LG high enough. Next tv will be LG too


Nismo

posted on 18th May 10 at 08:36

quote:
Originally posted by Andrew
Plasma is old technology though. Personally i'd be going for LCD over plasma all day long. Things that did it for me is the fact you won't burn an image into the screen and also running costs on are cheaper.


Plasma technology has moved on since then! Image burn takes a hell of a lot longer now and plasmas last upto 18 years now.

Theres pro's and cons on both, The pros on the Plasma out weighted the pros on an LCD for me.


BarnshaW

posted on 18th May 10 at 06:16

quote:
Originally posted by Andrew
Plasma is old technology though. Personally i'd be going for LCD over plasma all day long. Things that did it for me is the fact you won't burn an image into the screen and also running costs on are cheaper.


depends what you want most out of the TV


Andrew

posted on 17th May 10 at 22:05

Plasma is old technology though. Personally i'd be going for LCD over plasma all day long. Things that did it for me is the fact you won't burn an image into the screen and also running costs on are cheaper.


jamied

posted on 17th May 10 at 21:31

http://www.avforums.com/forums/tv-should-i-buy/1241107-these-plasmas.html
might be helpful mate


ljames555

posted on 17th May 10 at 21:19

quote:
Originally posted by Nismo
Yeah I have that one!

I havent seen no others that have the same design, I love mine and love the picture! Plasma 600Hz all the way :thumbs:

£519 here: http://www.froogle.prcdirect.co.uk/televisions/plasma-televisions/50-inch-plasma-televisions/50pq6000/product




absolute bargain that how did you find that I found my cheapest on a compare site.

Cheers Nismo


Whittie

posted on 17th May 10 at 16:57

Mines slightly different, i've got the 50PG6010.

Decent tv though.


Nismo

posted on 17th May 10 at 16:50

Yeah I have that one!

I havent seen no others that have the same design, I love mine and love the picture! Plasma 600Hz all the way :thumbs:

£519 here: http://www.froogle.prcdirect.co.uk/televisions/plasma-televisions/50-inch-plasma-televisions/50pq6000/product


Whittie

posted on 17th May 10 at 14:28

Think i've got that one.


ljames555

posted on 17th May 10 at 13:14

Right looking at new TVs.

But I am after the same design as the LG 50pq6000 where it has 1 piece of glass over the front.

I think Nismo off here has one ?

is there any other tvs that Lg do in the same design ? or other brands.

I might get the pq6000 because seen it for £550 but just wondering if I have any other options.

:)