corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Off Day » Geek Day » Now this is a quick PC... » Post Reply

Post Reply
Who Can Post? All users can post new topics and all users can reply.
Icon:
Formatting Mode:
Normal
Advanced
Help

Insert Bold text Insert Italicized text Insert Underlined text Insert Centered text Insert a Hyperlink Insert Email Hyperlink Insert an Image Insert Code Formatted text Insert Quoted text
Message:
HTML is Off
Smilies are On
BB Code is On
[img] Code is On
Post Options: Disable smileys?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email notification of new replies?

Steve

posted on 13th Apr 06 at 19:36

quote:
Originally posted by PaulW
quote:
Originally posted by Steve
quote:
Originally posted by PaulW
WD RAPTOR drives will slow it down...

2 of the newer 150gb will perform quicker in RAID-0 than what 2 74GB RAPTOR 1's would...

or just go full-hog with a proper SCSI RAID


the WD Raptor drives are pretty much equal to the speed of SCSI


still on average 10 to 15% slower in comparison


not according to direct comparisons of read/write reviews/tests

http://techreport.com/reviews/2003q2/10k-comparo/index.x?pg=1

for example


abdus

posted on 13th Apr 06 at 19:05

RAM support

Windows NT 4.0: 4 GB
Windows 2000 Professional: 4 GB
Windows 2000 Standard Server: 4 GB
Windows 2000 Advanced Server: 8GB
Windows 2000 Datacenter Server: 32GB
Windows XP Professional: 4 GB
Windows Server 2003 Web Edition: 2 GB
Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition: 4 GB
Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition: 32 GB
Windows Server 2003 Datacenter Edition: 64 GB



[Edited on 13-04-2006 by abdus]


PaulW

posted on 13th Apr 06 at 19:01

quote:
Originally posted by Steve
quote:
Originally posted by PaulW
WD RAPTOR drives will slow it down...

2 of the newer 150gb will perform quicker in RAID-0 than what 2 74GB RAPTOR 1's would...

or just go full-hog with a proper SCSI RAID


the WD Raptor drives are pretty much equal to the speed of SCSI


still on average 10 to 15% slower in comparison


Steve

posted on 13th Apr 06 at 17:07

quote:
Originally posted by PaulW
WD RAPTOR drives will slow it down...

2 of the newer 150gb will perform quicker in RAID-0 than what 2 74GB RAPTOR 1's would...

or just go full-hog with a proper SCSI RAID


the WD Raptor drives are pretty much equal to the speed of SCSI


Bart

posted on 12th Apr 06 at 17:59

quote:
Originally posted by John
There is nothing stopping xp from using more than 1gig of physical ram.


thats what i thought.

tbh, i can remember seeing something in the bios/registry to allow the use of RAM when your graphics card ram is used up (during gaming).

AGP Apereture rings a bell, but i dont think its that tbh


John

posted on 12th Apr 06 at 16:06

Its something specific to your install anyway.
There is no reason for xp to only use 1 gig.


PaulW

posted on 12th Apr 06 at 16:04

quote:
Originally posted by John
There is nothing stopping xp from using more than 1gig of physical ram.


then why does it refuse to...

linux can use it all fine if need be (using blender to render silly big images)

but xp, whether using 3dsmax, bf2, etc... just never goes above 1gig


John

posted on 12th Apr 06 at 15:40

There is nothing stopping xp from using more than 1gig of physical ram.


PaulW

posted on 12th Apr 06 at 14:20

quote:
Originally posted by Cybermonkey
with 2GB of RAM, i dont think the HDD will affect speed much when it comes to graphic rendering...

yes but XP can only manage to use 1 gig of the available ram, I have 2gig in mine, and no matter how much I load up shit on XP, it never uses more than 1gig of physical ram!


Cybermonkey

posted on 12th Apr 06 at 10:58

getting over 10k is the tricky bit Bart, as it takes an X1900XT or Geforce 7xxx in SLi to breach 10,000. i would like to see a purchasable computer than can bust the 13k mark other than this one...


Bart

posted on 12th Apr 06 at 10:45

quote:
Originally posted by Cybermonkey

13586 marks in 3DMark05




well, my PC is a fair bit under-rated than that and i also only have a single X1800XT 512mb graphics card and i scored just under 10k for 3dmark 05.

:lol:


Cybermonkey

posted on 12th Apr 06 at 09:50

with 2GB of RAM, i dont think the HDD will affect speed much when it comes to graphic rendering...


PaulW

posted on 11th Apr 06 at 15:07

WD RAPTOR drives will slow it down...

2 of the newer 150gb will perform quicker in RAID-0 than what 2 74GB RAPTOR 1's would...

or just go full-hog with a proper SCSI RAID


Cybermonkey

posted on 11th Apr 06 at 15:03

Processor(s): AMD Athlon FX-60 2MB cache
Motherboard(s): nVidia nForce 4 X16
Graphics Card(s): 2 X Gigabyte GeForce 7900GTX in SLI
Memory: 2 X 1GB Corsair PC3500LL PRO DDR
Hard Disk(s): WD Raptor 74GB 10,000RPM SATA

:lol::lol: 7900GTX in SLi, are they nuts :lol:

13586 marks in 3DMark05

:wave: