corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Off Day » Geek Day » SATA II vs SATA III hard drives » Post Reply

Post Reply
Who Can Post? All users can post new topics and all users can reply.
Icon:
Formatting Mode:
Normal
Advanced
Help

Insert Bold text Insert Italicized text Insert Underlined text Insert Centered text Insert a Hyperlink Insert Email Hyperlink Insert an Image Insert Code Formatted text Insert Quoted text
Message:
HTML is Off
Smilies are On
BB Code is On
[img] Code is On
Post Options: Disable smileys?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email notification of new replies?

Bart

posted on 31st Oct 12 at 09:15

quote:
Originally posted by noshua
NAS will probably be bottleneck

Its quite a high spec NAS, i.e dual core cpu, 4gb ram IIRC

The normal HDD was a Samsung spinpoint F1, 750GB.


noshua

posted on 31st Oct 12 at 09:08

NAS will probably be bottleneck


John

posted on 30th Oct 12 at 14:24

Something not right there, should be able to saturate a gigabit connection no bother with a normal hard drive.


Bart

posted on 30th Oct 12 at 14:19

going back to my post, Ive just realised that the transfer speed from the storage hard drive is less than half of that from an SSD.

Transferring my downloaded videos to my NAS over the network was getting ~40mb/s.
I decided to put my 3rd SSD (128GB) and use this as my storage drive.

Now when moving my files over to the network drive, im getting ~110mb/s, a nice increase.


Sam

posted on 28th Oct 12 at 15:34

Cheers.

I will probably have an all-SSD system when prices become more favourable as I got an SSD in my MacBook Pro and love the speed but something like a 512GB SSD x2 would cost quite a lot at the moment :lol:


Bart

posted on 28th Oct 12 at 15:19

there is a noticeable difference between Sata II and III.

As its only for storage, there is no need to shell out on a new Sata III hard drive.

Ive actually done the same myself (albeit have 2x Sata III disks in raid0 for my main OS).
If you use your storage drive for working on large files (such as artwork, video editing etc etc), its best to move that file to your desktop while editing, then back to your storage drive, that way everything will be working at its quickest.

hth
*edit* I actually have a 3rd SSD kicking around (a matching third) and am thinking of buying a Per5/6 raid controller and going to 4 SSDs in a raid 0 :)

[Edited on 28-10-2012 by Bart]


Sam

posted on 28th Oct 12 at 14:00

I assume that unless you are buying an SSD, there is no point going for a SATA III hard drive as it'll never actually get anywhere near those speeds (or even reach SATA II speeds) due to the drive limitations?

Reason I ask is that although the board I am buying for my new gaming/web development PC will support SATA III, I have a couple of spare 250GB SATA II drives which I was planning on using in it.

I am planning on using an SSD for my C: drive to boot the OS and apps off, but use the two HDDs for file storage only.

I guess what I am trying to ask is, do I need to shell out for a new SATA III hard drive for storage or can I just use my existing stock and not worry about any performance degradation as there will be no improvement in speed...