Corsa Sport - for Vauxhall and Opel Corsa B, Corsa C and Corsa D

Not logged in [Login - Register]

You Are Not Registered Or Not Logged In

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » PVDAlloys.co.uk » Post Reply

Who Can Post?

All users can post new topics and all users can reply.

Icon:

Formatting Mode:
Normal
Advanced
Help

Message:
HTML is Off
Smilies are On
BB Code is On
[img] Code is On

Post Options:

Disable smileys?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email notification of new replies?


PaulW	posted on 28th Dec 03 at 00:20
	front page looks like that for me too, is just when going to the wheel packages it displays like it did up top
Joff	posted on 28th Dec 03 at 00:09
	Well that's the closest to how it should look so far. I suppose I could have just coded it all with tables, but it's nice to get away from using tables for layout if possible :) Trying a bit of both ...
Dan B	posted on 27th Dec 03 at 21:42
	CS works absolutely fine in Opera 7, not found any problems yet... PVD Alloys, however, does not:
Joff	posted on 27th Dec 03 at 21:20
	Cheers! Although why anyone would want to view an alloy-wheel website (where the main purpose of visiting is to view images of alloy wheels) with a text-only browser. :P
Joff	posted on 27th Dec 03 at 21:16
	quote: Originally posted by Ian MS Internet Explorer No 19757060 97.3 % Opera No 169589 0.8 % Netscape No 151874 0.7 % Mozilla No 138888 0.6 % Konqueror No 29091 0.1 % Safari No 23039 0.1 % Unknown ? 16357 0 % Nokia Browser (PDA/Phone browser) No 324 0 % Sony/Ericsson Browser (PDA/Phone browser) No 213 0 % Galeon No 124 0 % Others 227 0 % You've not seen our user agent log then :D Like I say, I'd like to have it fairly cross-platform. When you say 'messy', could you screen dump it? Whilst CS probably isn't the most accurate representation of web users as a whole, IE isn't far off that percentage of the market share. There isn't one browser that is 100% happy with CSS - there's so many fixes you need to cater for it makes more sense from a costs perspective to cater for the majority. Those with less significant browsers should be fully aware of the implications of using them on today's WWW - I've tried Opera (and infact I'm currently using Mozilla) and at the end of the day, IE is so much better.
PaulW	posted on 27th Dec 03 at 21:05
	Lynx 2.8.5-11
Trotty	posted on 27th Dec 03 at 20:58
	I can't show you a screenie right now, our *nix box at work shows CS surprisingly well though. I will check pvdalloys.co.uk when I'm back if you like.
Joff	posted on 27th Dec 03 at 20:54
	Trotty, how does it look in Lynx? Most if not all of my sites should be more than happy in text-only/screen reader browsers - it's just the display elements of CSS have become a bit messed up across the latest browsers...
PaulW	posted on 27th Dec 03 at 20:28
	Thats what ya get if you dont click exactly on the text link within the drop-down menu, or if you click on a line between sections. It's ok in konqueror, but I think its probably related to how mozilla handles javascript. Microsoft is just shoved in everyones face though, like it or not you get it & its not an option unless you build your own machine :P explains the results :lol:
Trotty	posted on 27th Dec 03 at 20:17
	Looks great on Lynx... :P
Ian	posted on 27th Dec 03 at 20:16
	MS Internet Explorer No 19757060 97.3 % Opera No 169589 0.8 % Netscape No 151874 0.7 % Mozilla No 138888 0.6 % Konqueror No 29091 0.1 % Safari No 23039 0.1 % Unknown ? 16357 0 % Nokia Browser (PDA/Phone browser) No 324 0 % Sony/Ericsson Browser (PDA/Phone browser) No 213 0 % Galeon No 124 0 % Others 227 0 % You've not seen our user agent log then :D Like I say, I'd like to have it fairly cross-platform. When you say 'messy', could you screen dump it?
PaulW	posted on 27th Dec 03 at 19:44
	CS runs ok in both Konqueror & Mozilla 1.51, but the menu is a bit messy at times in mozilla apart from that no probs here (linux) just making a website for IE is silly... not everyone uses it
Ian	posted on 27th Dec 03 at 18:53
	How is CS? I don't test it too well as I've not much installed but I'd like to know how it behaves.
Joff	posted on 27th Dec 03 at 16:43
	Having a site that validates through any parser isn't the be all and end all with complying to W3C recommendations. Looking over some of the warning that throws up, there are a few tweaks that I could do to fix them - just stuff where I've been rushed and it tests and runs in IE 6 so... moved on to my next item on the to-do list ;) I also think using the correct Doctype would fix a couple of points, but it's a lot easier to just use Transitional and let the (MS) browsers do the rest ;)
l33t corsa	posted on 27th Dec 03 at 16:09
	Funny you should mention W3C... http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pvdalloys.co.uk http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.pvdalloys.co.uk&warning=1&profile=css2&usermedium=all
Joff	posted on 27th Dec 03 at 15:21
	Yeah, relies on CSS-2 quite a bit and as IE 6 has the most complete W3C implementation, we decided to go with IE only.
groom	posted on 27th Dec 03 at 13:47
	itts oerfect in IE for me
l33t corsa	posted on 27th Dec 03 at 13:42
	Looks even nicer in Firebird:
PaulW	posted on 27th Dec 03 at 10:53
	Is a bit fooked... Mmmmmmmmmmm Crab Paste!