|
Not logged in [Login - Register] |
You Are Not Registered Or Not Logged In |
Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » Turbo vs N/A » Post Reply
|
Nismo |
posted on 17th Dec 03 at 10:55 |
ive driven both in performance vehicles but still find turbo versions more fun | |
Daimo B |
posted on 17th Dec 03 at 10:53 |
Mail em to me, i'll host them all :) | |
Stu |
posted on 17th Dec 03 at 10:43 |
:) The 200 is unbeleivable. Ive had the wheels spinning at over 100mph in 5th when its wet cos the boost comes in so hard! Its just impossible to drive unless its 100% dry! Ive spun it about 3 times now, when boost comes in mid corner! :) | |
Daimo B |
posted on 17th Dec 03 at 10:38 |
U always did seem to have a lot of wonga :lol: When u gonna splash some down this was. How's the 200 running anyway? Oh oh, dude, can u email me some pictures of your old Corsa? And ur new nissan so i can put em in my database. I'll u2u u my email. | |
DAYZEE |
posted on 17th Dec 03 at 10:36 |
I think its all down to the capacity of the engine, a 3.0L Turbo @ 250BHP will probably mash a 2.0L N/A @ 250 BHP. | |
Stu |
posted on 17th Dec 03 at 10:35 |
Ive had both now - Highish power N/A 2.0ltr corsa on throttle bodies and a Turboed 350bhp Nissan 200sx. To be honest I like em both but the Nissan was much easier to tune. For £3000 I took the 197bhp Nissan up to 300bhp+ for the same money I took the 170bhp Corsa to around the 210bhp mark. Like the corsa though, the Nissan became a little bit undriveable in anything but perfect conditions so I have purchased an Impreza P1 for the day to day drive! ;) | |
Daimo B |
posted on 17th Dec 03 at 10:30 |
Yeah, about 3k higher :lol: But u could still feel the power of the na engine pulling and pulling where-as the turbo felt much smoother. The NA engine felt much more raw. | |
Cybermonkey |
posted on 17th Dec 03 at 10:29 |
it had a 9k redline didnt it? | |
l33t corsa |
posted on 17th Dec 03 at 10:19 |
Did Lucky B's corsa rev much higher? Higher revving = take advantage of gearing, which may be why it felt faster? | |
Daimo B |
posted on 17th Dec 03 at 10:13 |
Been in a 280bhp Turbo Corsa | |
vibrio |
posted on 17th Dec 03 at 10:06 |
quote: your opinion is tainted :lol: | |
ajscorsa |
posted on 17th Dec 03 at 09:42 |
never driven a turbo car but been in a tb'd 2lt nova and it goes like shit loved every minute | |
MattyB |
posted on 17th Dec 03 at 09:41 |
N/A always - but not on a derv. lol | |
Lucky B |
posted on 17th Dec 03 at 09:33 |
n/a all the way :thumbs: | |
vibrio |
posted on 17th Dec 03 at 08:40 |
quote: depends on turbo delievery Mr Kindness. turbo will produce more torque compared to the same CC of N/A motor. persoanlly I prefer turbo charged cars. | |
DAYZEE |
posted on 17th Dec 03 at 00:38 |
quote: Not true, MR2 Turbo vs S2000. Same BHP but the MR2 is quicker in a straight line. Thats what you get for having a poxy VTEC with no torque.:P And the S2000 is lighter!!! | |
AK |
posted on 16th Dec 03 at 23:19 |
250bhp NA would rip ass off 250bhp T!! | |
Sooty |
posted on 16th Dec 03 at 23:13 |
very broad question, can you be more specific? | |
sxi16vjoe |
posted on 16th Dec 03 at 23:12 |
waht do u want to discuss?? | |
CorsaLad |
posted on 16th Dec 03 at 23:10 |
Please discuss |