![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Not logged in [Login - Register] |
![]() |
You Are Not Registered Or Not Logged In |
![]() | ![]() |
Corsa Sport » Message Board » Help Zone, Modification and ICE Advice » rolling road.... » Post Reply
|
mav |
posted on 10th Sep 03 at 07:50 |
All RR will be different...U can only go along with the ones you've been on.... | |
miles |
posted on 10th Sep 03 at 07:30 |
You will find that most rollers are inaccurate. The idea of accurate rollers is hard to see as loads of different rollers give different results, depending on various conditions. I know someone that had there Astra Gsi rollers twice in 2 months on different rr's with no engine changes and there was a difference of 14bhp, thats on a pretty much standard engine. | |
L885 1.28v |
posted on 10th Sep 03 at 07:30 |
what does a 1.4 16v sport put out at the wheels? | |
mav |
posted on 9th Sep 03 at 22:49 |
My graph from star | |
MikeH |
posted on 9th Sep 03 at 22:13 |
well tollerances can be measured more or less accurate..... they are called race tuned :P | |
corsa120 |
posted on 9th Sep 03 at 21:29 |
yes nassua ur right i was at peugeot ecosse rolling road day an all 106 gti's were putting out 128bhp an thats standard book says 120 bhp i think it is so the manufacturers can cover there backsides if ur car under performs then big trouble for vauxhall/peugeot etc etc an other brands | |
nassau |
posted on 9th Sep 03 at 21:00 |
this link has a good wee write up on the different rating standards for power, it's references are for american motors but theory still the same.... | |
nassau |
posted on 9th Sep 03 at 20:56 |
think along the lines of trade descriptions, if they say the engine is 110 and you get it tested at 90 then they either have to rerate the car, not good pr, or spend time/money to bring it up. however if it 'appears' to over perform then we're happy customers ! | |
MikeH |
posted on 9th Sep 03 at 20:34 |
Do other manufacturers give out 'minimum' figures too? | |
miles |
posted on 9th Sep 03 at 20:25 |
I've never heard that they are minimum. They will be true. | |
nassau |
posted on 9th Sep 03 at 20:18 |
aye, i was a bit taken aback, like i said it was running crap as well. only thing is the figures quoted by vauxhall are supposed to be 'minimum' figures i believe, whether or not they are really 8 or so horses less who knows.... i'll get the graph scanned and post if anyone is interested. | |
miles |
posted on 8th Sep 03 at 20:15 |
I'd say thats one optimistic rolling road! | |
nassau |
posted on 8th Sep 03 at 19:37 |
had the car (2001 corsa c 1.4 16v )up to star performance on saturday morning on the rolling road, 98bhp and 95lb.ft at 6000 and 4200 respectively. cant complain coz thats with nothing done to it. and i thought it was running crap.... any other confirmed figures for the 1.4-16v ? |