corsasport.co.uk
  Not logged in [Login - Register]  
You Are Not Registered Or Not Logged In  

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Help Zone, Modification and ICE Advice » pioneer or sony? » Post Reply

Post Reply
Who Can Post? All users can post new topics and all users can reply.
Icon:
Formatting Mode:
Normal
Advanced
Help
Insert Bold text Insert Italicized text Insert Underlined text Insert Centered text Insert a Hyperlink Insert Email Hyperlink Insert an Image Insert Code Formatted text Insert Quoted text
Message:
HTML is Off
Smilies are On
BB Code is On
[img] Code is On
Post Options: Disable smileys?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email notification of new replies?

IntaCepta

 posted on 19th Jun 06 at 17:21

quote:
Originally posted by sri power
sony are quite


compared to what?


It's no contest, pioneer


AdiSRI

 posted on 19th Jun 06 at 15:42

deffo the pioneer, but id go for a slightly higher spec pioneer if you can afford a bit more either:

http://www.caraudiocentre.co.uk/product.asp?product=21582

or

http://www.caraudiocentre.co.uk/product.asp?product=21657


craig_s

 posted on 17th Jun 06 at 11:25

ive got an x plod hu cus i got it cheap and its been fine its lasted nearly three years never had a problemwith it.


Gavin

 posted on 30th May 06 at 21:10

quote:
Originally posted by Planty02
definately pioneer - sony are rubbish for car audio - I had a sony and it was ok at low volumes but when you turn it up the quality is shocking



soooo true!... sony are pretty poor in car audio.....
pionner are top dogs :thumbs:

[Edited on 30-05-2006 by Gavin]

[Edited on 30-05-2006 by Gavin]


Marc

 posted on 30th May 06 at 20:15

Sony was 1997, so they may have improved. My Alpine was bought in 2003.


Martin

 posted on 30th May 06 at 19:49

how old is the SONY HU? im just trying to give them a chance to be fair mate. there stuff is improving, but will never rival big guns. rockford, alpine, pioneer, nakimich etc etc


Marc

 posted on 30th May 06 at 19:47

My Dad had a Sony head unit in his old Golf, cd's were fine but radio reception was terrible. I know others that have said the same. My Alpine has both good cd and clear radio reception.


Martin

 posted on 30th May 06 at 19:29

quote:
Originally posted by Marc
Sony make terrible car stereos, which is odd as everything else is brilliant!

BTW, get an Alpine ;)



this is why i say there stuff is improving. i bet in a budget install, hardly any of you could tell the difference between SONY and Alpine :P


Marc

 posted on 30th May 06 at 10:26

Sony make terrible car stereos, which is odd as everything else is brilliant!

BTW, get an Alpine ;)


Martin

 posted on 25th May 06 at 18:24

at lower end you wont notice much difference TBH. Only in bigger instals or at higher volumes will you notice a difference in SQ.

out of those two id go for SONY. Their new stuff is improving loads. Not rivaling the big guns yet, but a defo improvement.


andy hirst

 posted on 25th May 06 at 15:25

sony are wank


mobymaster

 posted on 25th May 06 at 07:28

Pioneer...


craig_s

 posted on 24th May 06 at 22:29

sony are quite good but pioneer wins everytime .


b4l

 posted on 15th May 06 at 22:06

pioneer definately.


Planty02

 posted on 14th May 06 at 22:20

definately pioneer - sony are rubbish for car audio - I had a sony and it was ok at low volumes but when you turn it up the quality is shocking


manchester-lad

 posted on 14th May 06 at 22:16

Hey guys cant make my mind up which one to buy which one would u have cheers

http://www.caraudiocentre.co.uk/product.asp?product=21482

http://www.caraudiocentre.co.uk/product.asp?product=20825