corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Help Zone, Modification and ICE Advice » 1.4 8v SRi vs 1.4 16v SRi » Post Reply

Post Reply
Who Can Post? All users can post new topics and all users can reply.
Icon:
Formatting Mode:
Normal
Advanced
Help

Insert Bold text Insert Italicized text Insert Underlined text Insert Centered text Insert a Hyperlink Insert Email Hyperlink Insert an Image Insert Code Formatted text Insert Quoted text
Message:
HTML is Off
Smilies are On
BB Code is On
[img] Code is On
Post Options: Disable smileys?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email notification of new replies?

BabyBlade

posted on 1st Mar 04 at 12:49

mpi of course ;)


BabyBlade

posted on 1st Mar 04 at 12:48

1.4 8v then


Lucusade

posted on 1st Mar 04 at 12:46

im not doing an engine conversion for the purpose of extra power. its just to last me till july when i come to sell it.

1.6/2.0 conversion sounds great, but ive already spent £600 and ive got feck all to show for it except an car with split piston rings sat in my garage.

i need a new engine, and i want to keep the cost as low as possible :thumbs:


broster

posted on 1st Mar 04 at 12:40

all the 1.4 16v engines were ecotec, on both the sport and the sri. the 1.6 engines are the ones where there are a difference, on the gsi and sport


BabyBlade

posted on 1st Mar 04 at 12:40

quote:
Originally posted by Lucusade
changing from a 1.4 8v to a 1.4 16v wouldnt require a new gearbox would it?


Total waste of money!

The8valves say theres are faster and the 16valves say there faster.

All i'm guna say is the 16valvers need to be revved to get the power out, and its expensive if anything goes wrong.

8valves pulls lower down.

Honestly your rend up paying a lot more money if the engine goes wrong and you wont notice any power increase.

if ur doing a convesion its gotta be 1.6 or 2.0 mate


mk4_astra

posted on 1st Mar 04 at 12:17

i think they are a little bit, but dought you'd notice it. economy technology so probably more restrictive inlet,exhaust and probably different ecu settings


Lucusade

posted on 1st Mar 04 at 12:04

ok mate, cheers.

were there issues with ecotec engines being slower?


mk4_astra

posted on 1st Mar 04 at 12:02

engine mounts will be the same,engine should come with an ecu if not i think you could use your old one,dunno about wiring loom wouldnt have thought so but some one else would be able to give you a definate answer.

on a side note- because your SRi is 8v its one of the early ones(non ecotec)and i think from 1997 all corsas were ecotecs so if you get offered an ecotec lump find out if any extra work is needed to fit one,though im pretty sure there isnt


Lucusade

posted on 1st Mar 04 at 11:46

what else would i need?

engine mounts, ecu, wiring loom?


mk4_astra

posted on 1st Mar 04 at 11:45

no im sure they both use the F13 gearbox,would be a straight swop


Lucusade

posted on 1st Mar 04 at 11:36

quote:
Originally posted by Ditch
might as well drop in the 1600 if insurance aint an issue.....


I dont really wanna stick in a 1.6 as i plan on selling it in july/august, and its already cost me over £600 and im still without a fully working engine.

changing from a 1.4 8v to a 1.4 16v wouldnt require a new gearbox would it?


Gambit

posted on 1st Mar 04 at 11:27

1.4 8v SPi is 60bhp
1.4 8v Si is 82bhp
1.4 16v Sri is 90 bhp

the SPI is single point injection the others are multi point injection


Ditch

posted on 1st Mar 04 at 11:26

might as well drop in the 1600 if insurance aint an issue.....

as for the SRi question,

8valve SRi is 82bhp with more low down tourque/grunt

16valve is 90bhp with better top-end and alot happier at high revs.

16valve is slightly quicker.


Lucusade

posted on 1st Mar 04 at 11:14

the deal is that ive just spent £500 on having the top end rebuilt because the cambelt snapped + £150 on various things in an MOT. but now its failed on emissions coz the piston rings are cracked :!

was thinking of getting a 1.6, but im thinking of getting rid of it soon come the summer so might just stick a 1.4 16v in there instead.

what ya reckon :thumbs:


sigibbons

posted on 1st Mar 04 at 11:14

i thought the 8v was 60bhp and the 16v was around 90bhp?


Voyto

posted on 1st Mar 04 at 11:09

i thought there was a big difference. the 1.4 8v is just as slow if not slower than the 1.2 16v (please correct me if im wrong, ive read this somewhere)


Sims

posted on 1st Mar 04 at 11:01

hehe mate this has been asked a million times. only problem is you can do a search for it because SRi is only 3 letters which u can't use to search with.

from what i have heard their isn't a great difference mate. i think the 16v has a better top end. i'm sure someone here will tell you the facts though


Lucusade

posted on 1st Mar 04 at 10:52

is there any noticable difference in power?