corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Off Day » Sports Day » Chelsea in more trouble? » Post Reply

Post Reply
Who Can Post? All users can post new topics and all users can reply.
Icon:
Formatting Mode:
Normal
Advanced
Help

Insert Bold text Insert Italicized text Insert Underlined text Insert Centered text Insert a Hyperlink Insert Email Hyperlink Insert an Image Insert Code Formatted text Insert Quoted text
Message:
HTML is Off
Smilies are On
BB Code is On
[img] Code is On
Post Options: Disable smileys?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email notification of new replies?

Marc

posted on 3rd Aug 06 at 11:35

Hes bound to get bored sooner or later.


Cosmo

posted on 3rd Aug 06 at 11:15

quote:
Originally posted by Mad Moe
I've read on numerous occasions that once his oldest son is 21 Chelsea will be passed to him to look after


his son is only 12, I would be very suprised if he was still interested in 9yrs time!


Mad Moe

posted on 3rd Aug 06 at 10:55

I've read on numerous occasions that once his oldest son is 21 Chelsea will be passed to him to look after


Cosmo

posted on 3rd Aug 06 at 10:38

quote:
Originally posted by Tom
Why would abramovic sell up though :boggle: he loves chelsea?


not saying he would, but IF he did they will never have enough money coming in to cover their costs.

He has been quoted a few times as saying he would love to own an F1 team one day, so after Chelsea win everything and he gets bored....


Tom

posted on 3rd Aug 06 at 10:35

Why would abramovic sell up though :boggle: he loves chelsea?


Cosmo

posted on 3rd Aug 06 at 10:05

quote:
Originally posted by Marc
Awww, I wanted you to post saying how Chelsea are if financial dificulty like Man United :(



they will be if Roman leaves in next five years ;)


nik

posted on 3rd Aug 06 at 07:20

Hate Chelsea but Bates really is a tit.


Marc

posted on 2nd Aug 06 at 18:04

quote:
Originally posted by Cosmo
pah...IF Chelsea did it they wouldnt get in trouble and would only get fined which makes no difference to them. If they didnt then they have nothing to worry about.



Awww, I wanted you to post saying how Chelsea are if financial dificulty like Man United :(


Nath

posted on 2nd Aug 06 at 15:36

quote:
Originally posted by --Dave--
quote:
Originally posted by Nath
My post says what it says.

Not accusing you of having a dig

I'm waiting for facts as Ken Bates isn't exactly Mr Honesty himself.


All i wanted to know :thumbs:


:)


Cosmo

posted on 2nd Aug 06 at 15:36

pah...IF Chelsea did it they wouldnt get in trouble and would only get fined which makes no difference to them. If they didnt then they have nothing to worry about.

It wouldnt be the first time though. They paid Utd 10mil for that Obe Mikel guy, as if Utd had reported them to UEFA they would of been in the shit.


--Dave--

posted on 2nd Aug 06 at 15:35

quote:
Originally posted by Nath
My post says what it says.

Not accusing you of having a dig

I'm waiting for facts as Ken Bates isn't exactly Mr Honesty himself.


All i wanted to know :thumbs:


Nath

posted on 2nd Aug 06 at 15:34

My post says what it says.

Not accusing you of having a dig.

I'm waiting for facts as Ken Bates isn't exactly Mr Honesty himself.


--Dave--

posted on 2nd Aug 06 at 15:30

are you accusing me of having a dig at Chelsea?

Or are you wanting to have a dig at Chelsea but want to know the facts first?

:lol: your post is midleading.


Nath

posted on 2nd Aug 06 at 15:25

I'm waiting for the details of the case before taking a dig at Chelski.


--Dave--

posted on 2nd Aug 06 at 15:23

indeed.

I'm awaiting Chelsea's reply :|


Nath

posted on 2nd Aug 06 at 15:20

Nothing will happen. Bates is dreaming.


--Dave--

posted on 2nd Aug 06 at 15:17

unlikely anything will come of this imo.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/5238558.stm