|
Not logged in [Login - Register] |
You Are Not Registered Or Not Logged In |
Corsa Sport » Message Board » Off Day » Question » Post Reply
|
andy1868 |
posted on 19th Apr 15 at 19:59 |
Russ |
posted on 19th Apr 15 at 17:47 |
pass me a pant | |
Ben G |
posted on 19th Apr 15 at 12:36 |
Pant/boxer/brief doesn't aound right anyway. | |
Russ |
posted on 19th Apr 15 at 10:33 |
thanks | |
Jimbothebarbarian |
posted on 19th Apr 15 at 10:02 |
Goggle FTW lol | |
Jimbothebarbarian |
posted on 19th Apr 15 at 10:01 |
Pants in the 16th century differed from today’s jeans in that each leg was a separate garment, donned in succession and then belted together at the waist. Thus it made sense to call these “two-piece britches” a “pair” of pants, and the usage stuck long after pants were unified. We speak of “a pair” of shorts or swimming trunks because of the precedent set by “pants.” | |
_Allan_ |
posted on 19th Apr 15 at 09:43 |
This thread is pants. | |
Russ |
posted on 19th Apr 15 at 07:33 |
I'll give you a pair of socks* if you give me the link | |
Nic Barnes |
posted on 19th Apr 15 at 07:11 |
No | |
Russ |
posted on 19th Apr 15 at 07:06 |
Link please | |
Nic Barnes |
posted on 19th Apr 15 at 07:06 |
Oddly enough I did know the answer. | |
Nic Barnes |
posted on 19th Apr 15 at 07:04 |
Have you tried google? It has the answers faster than the thick twats on here. | |
Russ |
posted on 19th Apr 15 at 07:03 |
Why are they called a pair of pants when they're singular |